What's your opinion about this quote?

Since you're communist and all I would like to know what your opinion about this quote. Also why you would think that communism will work, even though it never has. Oh and also why so many queers etc is supporting communism altough they would have been throwed into gulag asap

Attached: Alex.jpg (800x600, 116.83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s5axVunzQSA
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

That quote is literally nazi propaganda. It's true that bolshevik were not all ethnically russian, but the russian empire was pretty big so a lot of people helped. They didn't slaughter million for the lulz. Also he supported the invasion during the civil war by 11 countries, so he has to shut up. Also he was cured while in the gulag and was scared of losing russian citizenship.

Without going into specific communism is the end goal not something you apply, but I understand what you are saying. Communism has worked everywhere it was applied from north korea, ussr to cuba and china. Doubled if not tripled standards of living, ended stsrvstion and industrialized most countries/made the illiterate majority literate
Because communist movements got coopted by liberals, in fact most of these people don't even support stalin, Kim or anti imperialist such as assad.
Because thanks to the new left now communism means safe space for queers and I don't know why we keep defending them like communism should do something against these people

...

Alright if communism ended starvation why did they have to put up signs not to eat their children?

They didn't do that do.

So you're saying that it's only lies? Do you deny starvation as a whole too?

I deny that there were sign saying you shouldn't eat children. The only famines that happened are the holodomor and china's great famine.

There was no starvation except for short periods of time in the beginning, simply because people living in affected areas were starving every couple of years.

Socialism was tremendous success. It would be much better if USSR didn't go full retard after Stalin's death: youtube.com/watch?v=s5axVunzQSA

I must be tired

Yeah, everyone did you retard. That's literally why they revolted.
Capitalism had more victims if you're gonna use "Muh deaths" as an argument, which guess what, it isn't.

Attached: download (1).jpg (236x213, 6.83K)

Ok, but only like 7million died in holodomor and 40 million in total in 1932-1933 so??

That better be a typo or else. It was 4 right?

haha yeah

The 40 million number is a meme, actual historians debunked it numerous times

Another question I have is that communism is a type of globalism, and what is your opinion about that?

It's fantastic.
Holy shit stop with the generic questions.
Yes communism was made and pushed by Jews, yes it's progressive, yes it's globalist, yes it wants to abolish race sex and identity, but instead of asking us "is this true" ask yourself why you hate those concepts so much.

Maybe because we are different and it would be ignorant to try and equalize them?

Don't listen to
No it's not. Listen why don't you educate yourself a bit before asking questions?

1. Not enough time
2. All commies I know are degenerate and not really something that's ideal in any way.
3. I just wanted to ask some questions to people that actually believe in it and have done research on their own rather than reading some news article about it because we all know how they are haha

Last question, what's your stance on mass immigration?

Neccesary for maintaining capitalism. If you like capitalism, (you) should be for it.

There are book about it and are not that long but ok, but people here shitpost a lot and can get you confused. Seriously tho, degen.erates are disgusting in general, they are not communist most of the time. Just liberals who larp as communist
It's caused by capitalism, will always exist in capitalism

Never said I did like capitalism, but all lefties are for it (mass immigration) so im confused hahah

But timmy did it tooooooo!

Does it abolish jews too? And why did Bolshevik russia give the jews their own separate oblast if race doesnt exist?

Inb4 jews not a race.

The jews believevthey are a separate race.

meh. Good video otherwise

you are confusing "Bolshevik" with "Hitler" and "oblast" with "Israel"

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

Still waiting for an answer from the commies.

Attached: Government-hq.jpg (1024x683 51.19 KB, 1.21K)

top kek, Stalin really did try to enclose all jews far away from moscow.

Why it's bothering you so much?

It is notorious that Stalin was an arrant antisemite.

Soljenitsyn was too, although he denied it in order to delude western liberals and to render his crypto-reactionnaries views more acceptable.


If this quote is true (which I doubt, since this one sounds too direct in consideration to the usual hypocrysy and obscurity of Solzhenitsyn style), then he insinuates that they were jews.

The old rant about a small jewish elite hating the country, christianity, driven by some ethnic supremacism and still holding the medias everywhere in the world is common from reactionnaries and fascists

That fact that the cimes of Stalin's regime has much less traumatized the western world than the crimes of nazi germany comes from three factors :

1) Popular participation and remorses.

Shoah implied populations participation amongst the whole Europe, due to widespread popular prejudices against jews, gipsies, homosexuals and so on. Peoples form the minorities targeted by the nazi regime were oftenly denounced by people they knew or not. This provoked some guilty backlash when the horror of the nazi camps were revealed. After this, many westerners were regretful and ashamed because they had antisemitic, racist or homophobic beliefs, even if they were not responsible of the death of someone.

On the other hand, the Gulag, the Holodomor and every atrocities committed under Stalin's rule were entirely the works of a bureauratic state and its repressive apparatus. Even the kids who denouced their parents for petty signs of impiety towards the "Little Father of the peoples" cannot be considered responsible, only the regime can be for the brainwashing they got in school

2) Contempt for Slavs, Admiration for Germans.

Until the 1940's, German Culture (novels, movies, clasical music, …) was highly diffused and well-known in the western space. Germany was regarded as the flagship of western culture. Names like Kant, Beethoven, Bach, Goethe, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx, Wagner were very familiar to westerner. German were highly esteemed by every other western nations. The shock was proportional to this pre-war attitude

The Russian culture was much less diffused and recognized. Of course, many novelers like Tolstoy, Dosteivsky and Gogol were popular in the west, but still, literature really was the sole matter in which Russian culture rivalized in recognization with German culture. Apart Tchaikovsky, can you name me an other well-known russian classical compositer ? Can you name one "great philosopher" from Russia ?

I'm not telling that Russian culture is inferior in any way. Only that it was much less popularized in the West before and after WW2, and still probably is.

Why does culture diffusion matters ? In a few words, it goes like this : "A tyrant took the helm in Russia and organized the killing of millions of people". To such sad news, a westerner will react, consiously or not, a bit like that : "what a tragedy, but hey, what can we expect of the Russians ? You know, after all it's the country of Ivan the Terrible, they are used to be lead by ruthless autocrats so nothing new under the sun"

However, may the same thing happens in a western nation, and furthermore in the one thought to be the most cultured, and the same westerner will doubt about mankind and civilization

3) Difference in "judiciar philosophies". This is the most important factor in my opinion

The nazis killed people for what they were, while stalin and his minions killed people for what they did.

The second is not stranger to the western conception of a justice system : punishing acts, "crimes", by the means of fines, prisons and sometimes death penalty. The Stalinist regime only added the disobedience to the state, or suspicion of this, in what is commonly accepted as crimes in western world. Also, history books are filled with story of conquerors, despotes and fanatics who killed thousands of people only for petty opposition or impiety. Everyone got used to this in the long run. Stalin was just an other of these bastards. Under his dictatorship, nobody is condemned to death for the sole fact of being born with some ethnic background, disability or sexual preference. You have to oppose the state or be suspected of the intention to do so, in order to be deported

However, what the nazis did is much frightening for any westerner. They assasined millions innocent, not on the basis of theirs behaviours, but on the basis of who they were. If you were a jew in nazi germany, even if you tried to live in peace, apolitically and in the respect of the law, you were condemned to die in a camp just for being a jew.