04/21 Happening: Newnan Neo-Nazi Rally Live

I only found a stream on Facebook. Which sucks. But thought it might maybe be fun for somebody?

facebook.com/Oldillo/videos/10156520124257845/UzpfSTc3NjEyMjg0NDpWSzoxMDE1NjUyMDEyNDI1Nzg0NQ/

Attached: newnan rally 04 21 2018.png (924x570, 707.9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

livestrong.com/slideshow/1008208-13-benefits-weightlifting-one-tells/#slide=7
huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/12/benefits-of-lifting-weights_n_6432632.html
facebook.com/wsbtv/videos/10156746114825695/
facebook.com/11Alive/videos/10155490828185496/
youtube.com/watch?v=947ByMfa5BE
reddit.com/r/Fuckthealtright/comments/8dya20/police_point_weapons_at_antinazi_protestors_at_a/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Also apparently from this.
Because of course it is.

Attached: newnan 2 apparently.jpg (1200x900, 235.15K)

Posting live from the event.

All the baboons are going to the zoo you cannot stop us

more info on this rally?

look at all these skinny guys fuck. More of the left needs to lift.

Lifting is a waste of time, pumped muscles will not accomplish you anything. Just eat healthy and do sports that actually better your health (e.g. running)

National Socialist Movement's holding a rally in Newnan Georgia, today.

In the US being skinny is like being buff anywhere else.

I don't get what that means can you explain I'm a burger.

Hes talking out of his ass but what he's saying is that since there are so many fat people in the US being skinny is the equivalent to being buff somewhere else.

Consistently highest obesity rates in the world.

This stream is shit, is there another one from inside the rally? Im pretty sure some aut righter is streaming from inside

Yeah, but it's only slightly ahead of other countries. Obesity is an issue in many late capitalist nations.

The RCP is there is see their shirts.

rally looks weak af. There more protesters than Nazis

There usually are.

Mexico has a higher obesity rate btw even though the average is higher than elsewhere its not like everyone is morbidly obese either in Mexico or the US. The idea that merely being skinny is like being buff is somewhat laughable from any perspective.


You have sinned. You need to get on some well-made Russian roids immediately just to atone. While I'm definitely not anti-cardio, you do realize that running is harder on your joints than lifting and lifting is one of the safest sports there is, right?

Attached: sovietmuscleII.jpg (505x800, 72.37K)

Looks like the Nazis may not even come out.

Im pretty sure depends on how much weight you lift, heavy weights can put you at risk if you are not careful.
While it is true that running can be hard on your join the point im trying to make is that muscle mass will not benefit you, while stuff like resistance training and cardio is great for your cardiovascular health.

Looks like the Nazis may not even come out.
They met in Temple for a dinner, and they may have skipped the public Newnan rally entirely. Now a bunch of people chanting at police to release some guy.

Update, apparently they just got in?

t. fatass

Attached: 07d04c02ba73b85dee5d5613b73bc8783587910f2e8791bea8a1fbae5e961087.png (548x366, 279.26K)

NSM just got in. Late. Kinda sad.

But it will, weight training has so many benefits that you'd be a fool to skip it. One study even found that lifting just 150 minutes a week lowered the diabetes risks of subjects by 34%:
livestrong.com/slideshow/1008208-13-benefits-weightlifting-one-tells/#slide=7
Another study found that the more muscle mass that you have the less likely you're to die prematurely:
huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/12/benefits-of-lifting-weights_n_6432632.html

The practicality of having more muscle is great in itself. At work, I watch the thin-as-a-rail types struggle to lift anything over 35 lbs whereas my coworkers rely on me to help them lift heavy objects all the time. Steel grills that are in excess of 100 lbs, heavy weight sets, 40+ bags of deer corn even bass boats etc.

I'm not even at the kind of job where you'd imagine that you'd need a lot of muscle but its better to have something and not need it then need something and not have it.

They're in the Wells-Fargo!

*jon boats

Another stream, more direct: facebook.com/wsbtv/videos/10156746114825695/

Attached: newnan rally 04 21 2018 2.png (985x448, 840.91K)

Like only 15 to 20 of them, thought there would be more.

Aerial view, as though anyone needed it:
facebook.com/11Alive/videos/10155490828185496/

Yup.

I'm sure you'll have lots of fun throwing your own shit at passerby's

I counted 22 nazis at most,lmao

Attached: newnan rally 04 21 2018 3.png (968x468, 964.25K)

finally the guy start the talk.

Of course they're fat.

Attached: 329aebdb2138a88f2287b4a663dd6fb7531630237e14ec055ac0bf861d005c8c.jpg (252x255, 20.2K)

I find it kind of hilarious - after a few hours of fucktards and boomers complaining about Antifa and saying that they're the same, this guy is very clearly playing to them. Guy's plainly talking in the current Zig Forums-to-Facebook cliches. Well-played.

This fucking country is a mess.

"Probably 50% of us have been in the military"

Lol

Almost every former enlisted guy I know is fat as fuck so they could be right. Also I'm surprised that number isn't higher.

I got a black co-worker dude.

Lmao he's going after skinny jeans now

Is it that time again?

Attached: b8ce33ec9fdc9dbcc5e3b6c2318369205a8a03ef6d7df82aa268393087c10b0a.png (621x516, 314.58K)

The far-right has been very anti-imperialists for the past few years while the liberals are becoming war hungry. What is this world coming to?

In words, not in practice

Capital and the nation-state are separating. The American petty bourg and the last of its labor aristocracy are no longer receiving as many benefits as they once did from imperialism. They erroneously believe that by opposing foreign intervention they can deprive their enemies (finance capital, "the jews", etc) of profit while strengthening their own movement, when in reality they are only going to destroy themselves since ultimately they are still part of the class that reaps the most rewards from American hegemony (which is held up by American military power.)

true, but when you have Casapound and other nazis and the far left being the only ones not being war hungry then it really tells us the state of US and Europe.

What does this change for socialists in terms of praxis/tactics?

Got some comrades out there counter-protesting. Hopefully they didn't get arrested.

There were only two or three arrests, they're probably fine

Wound down. If anybody keeps watching for some reason and anything happens, let us know.

It means a better political landscape for us, because just by being anti-way (which the vast majority of people are) we become the only choice for all the people who oppose war.

When those people decide who to listen to, these are their choices:
Conservative - pro-war, so no
Liberal - pro-war, so no
Nazi - anti-war, but also Nazis, so no
Us - anti-war

It can only be good for us.

Attached: 1505751532764.webm (640x360, 1M)

Attached: c190438ecf2d326eee44667d5fd35d95bc5f22a37b5bd78428d2f16106c40a5e.jpg (751x219, 21.14K)

In the west nazis are pretending to be against foreign intervention in order to win support.

youtube.com/watch?v=947ByMfa5BE

who cares. all this amounts to is a bunch of autists standing around shouting about their retarded ideology

So did anything important happen at this?

Neonazis hate war in the mideast because it benefits Israel.

Not true. American conservatism has a deep vein of isolationism that goes back to the founding fathers. In George washingtons farewell speech he basically said dont get entangled in foreign wars and politics and to fuck the old world and focus only on the new world. America was very isolationist country up until ww1 and ww2. The neocon branch are the ones who jerk off to war a lot and the far right see them as jewish and former trots.

Attached: 406px-FlaggWakeUpAmerica.jpg (406x599, 51.08K)

Is that an AR-15 pointed against an unarmed protester?

What the fuck

*strikes out west*
*declares war on Spain to claim their colonies*
America being isolationist is part of the mask the country wears to disguise themselves as the benevolent Imperial power who only acts "when they must" and "protects the little people from ravenous tyrants"

America made mad dosh by financing the slaughter of WW1. They participated in WW2 for years before actually declaring war, and even then they were more concerned with developing their ability to destroy cities from the air than helping their "allies" in China and the Soviet Union.

The isolationist tradition really comes from America’s history as a developing country. It died after this stance became irreconcilable with American capitalism. Only some conservatives and anti-imperialist leftists can be said to hold onto this tradition but for different reasons.

No, it does not. American conservatism is just another candy-covered retarded ideology fed to the proles to ship them to their next imperialist adventure since the 19th century. My god lad, what level of revisionism are you on?

Can someone explain the whole "trots become neocons" thing to me? Is it really true? Why?

Attached: 544147398_360x203.png (360x203 171.8 KB, 170.92K)

exemplary

reddit.com/r/Fuckthealtright/comments/8dya20/police_point_weapons_at_antinazi_protestors_at_a/

Nope.

Irving Kristol was a trot, became pretty much the first neocon, and his aon Bill Kristol is still flapping his dicksuckers on TV to this day.

This stupid country has been at war for nearly its entire existence, you can't really blame it on the neocons considering they've only been around for a few decades. Not that it even matters in this case since the people in question are neo-nazis, perpetual war is a central tenet of their ideology

wew lad

The neoconservatives rejected the counterculture New Left and what they considered anti-capitalistism in the non-interventionism of the activism against the Vietnam War. After the anti-war faction took control of the party during 1972 and nominated George McGovern, the Democrats among them endorsed Washington Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson instead for his unsuccessful 1972 and 1976 campaigns for president. Among those who worked for Jackson were incipient neoconservatives Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Richard Perle.[35] During the late 1970s, neoconservatives tended to endorse Ronald Reagan, the Republican who promised to confront Soviet expansionism. Neoconservatives organized in the American Enterprise Institute and The Heritage Foundation to counter the liberal establishment.[36]

In another (2004) article, Michael Lind also wrote:[37]

Neoconservatism … originated in the 1970s as a movement of anti-Soviet liberals and social democrats in the tradition of Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Humphrey and Henry ('Scoop') Jackson, many of whom preferred to call themselves 'paleoliberals.' [After the end of the Cold War] … many 'paleoliberals' drifted back to the Democratic center … Today's neocons are a shrunken remnant of the original broad neocon coalition. Nevertheless, the origins of their ideology on the left are still apparent. The fact that most of the younger neocons were never on the left is irrelevant; they are the intellectual (and, in the case of William Kristol and John Podhoretz, the literal) heirs of older ex-leftists.

I'd just say the conservative tradition didn't really exist circa Washington. Literally a revolutionary, and conservatism as we know it today was defined later. Slavery was even an ethical issue with a lot of the founding fathers who had slaves, but it wouldn't get abolished for a long time.