How do I convince my trans Facebook Marxist friend to stop with the unnecessary idpol...

How do I convince my trans Facebook Marxist friend to stop with the unnecessary idpol. She makes fun of "poor ugly white people" pretty frequently, posts about "not wanting to hang out with straight people" etc etc, that kind of shit. I don't know how to bring this up without being accused and blacklisted

Attached: 904424.jpg (1280x720, 160.18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm
socialistworker.org/2017/08/01/a-marxist-case-for-intersectionality
youtube.com/watch?v=sRnEjs0GZgo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Tell him this.

Attached: sniff Go to gulag.mp4 (480x360, 119.6K)

tell him to go fucking kill himself, and that he will never be a woman(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

...

tell them that politics, in particular marxist socialist politics, is about mass movements, and you're not going to get anywhere by insulting the "poor white ugly people" who would need to be a part of that mass movement. The reason marx made workers the center of this political analysis is because they are both central to the reproduction of capitalism and those being exploited by it.

I often see a lot of "no comrade of mine" "you're part of the problem" rhetoric when this is brought up in response to these idpol types, particularly on twitter. Honestly I think these people are not particularly interested in building socialism. They will perhaps make decent boots when a mass movement gets going but because of these divisive, vampire castle demands for penitence they can't be anywhere near an organizing position.
I do think anyone trying to convince a friend (rando idpolers will see any critique as an attack) would do best with this however. Marx didn't identify workers as the catalyst because they were oppressed, or deserve it, not necessarily. It's because the workers are the engine of capitalism. Necessarily, the revolutionary proletariat is going to include mostly straight white dudes. If that actually bothers someone then chances are it's not really about worker's liberation.

gulag

Sometimes I doubt even this. If someone saying a mean word or not explicitly catering to some essentialized quality yourself is all it takes to throw you off, then how will any of these people be able to carry out or even survive in a revolution? How will they even survive in socialism?

*about yourself

Marxism is about the struggle of classes, of the interests of labor opposed to the interests of capital. While the immediate appearance of this struggle is that of immediate economic demands, the only way for labor to truly realize its interests is too look beyond the system of capital, capitalism, towards socialism, that is to say, that for the social interests of the working class to be realized it would have to look beyond its own immediate economic interests and view its struggle as a political struggle for the emancipation of the whole of society.

While the struggle for socialist liberation necessarily a political struggle subsuming not only the direct economic interests of the workers but also the political emancipation of all oppressed (which, I suppose, includes the queers), the only way to realize this universal emancipation is through the working class's struggle against capital. In order for the workers to advance their own interests, the whole (or at the very least its most advanced detachment) of the working class must be united, through a principled organization of revolutionaries, in opposition to capital. "Workers of the world unite."

Dismissiveness of the white working class or to, I suppose, potentially prejudiced heterosexual workers, means to sow divisiveness within the working class, and masks an elitist liberal bourgeois disdain for the working class in general. Those that complain about 'white trash' are almost as bad as those that talk of urban blacks as 'niggers'; both are a mask for disdain towards the working class.

This does not mean however, that racism or sexism should not be fought. Oh contraire, it is essential for any revolutionary movement in the West today to do so, for the struggle against capitalism must necessarily be a political struggle. However, as Marxists we are materialists. We understand that reactionary prejudices are the product of an objectively-existing materially-constituted system. To use an illustration - a black cop murdering a black teenager would still be an example of racist police violence because it is ultimately irrelevant the actual prejudices of the police officer in question; what matters is the system and its objective material conditions which these individual actions are constituted. It is through changing people's material conditions through workers' struggle that we can overcome people's problems.

I recommend Lenin's The Attitude of the Workers’ Party to Religion.
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm


She's acting idealist

I somewhat agree. I imagine most are probably petit bourgeois who in the end would be against any kind of revolution (because, culturally, they find workers disgusting and don't have any concrete, material reason to solidarize themselves with workers).

That isn't saying that they all will. I'm sure a few do have legitimate left-wing sympathies distorted by the framework of identity politics. Still, I doubt most have revolutionary potential.

Doesn't seem like much of a friend if you can't bring any of that up. Get rid of them.

Attached: Screenshot_142.jpg (644x644, 63.7K)

see

There's no such thing as a "trans Marxist." Tell him to read Engels.

Attached: ghost.jpg (600x600, 33.38K)

Why did he get banned for this?

because it's an autistic screeching idpolfest of a post?

if he wants to edgy for the sake of edginess, he should go to Zig Forums. That ban was deserved

Edginess isn't bannable. Long as it doesn't deal with something that has reached baboonposter levels, speech policing is just preening.

Anti-trans shitposting

How is it idpol to state that a man may not become a woman?

All politics is identity politics. "Identity politics" should just be filtered to "politics".

Just tell her at the risk of being blacklisted, if you come off as aggressive enough they'll do it.

Wrong board.

This idpol is "Marxism" to her. Eventually she will get bored of it and become another milquetoast liberal.

...

This really

OP didn't specify FTM or MTF.

Behold the king of petty posts

You don't Marxism without intersectionality isn't marxism, its fascism.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Fuck off and die

Boil your head in piss

"no"

Attached: 77968e7795858251eba31b483ce5bb9595b604f9.png (1000x1000, 535.01K)

Attached: radical.jpg (250x334, 30.24K)

Attached: het.png (733x1080, 1.82M)

It's not but telling someone to kill themselves followed immediately by a comment about them being trans would mean it's very easy to infer that perhaps that poster wouldn't have made that post if OP didn't mention them being a tranny.

Of course, you're not actually posting in good faith so I'm not sure why I'm replying, but have a free (you)

That is correct tho.

Fuck off

...

...

okay brocialist.

socialistworker.org/2017/08/01/a-marxist-case-for-intersectionality

Just go back to reddit

whoever made this article needs to go back to the democratic party

Trans people are a result of capitalism and alienation and have never existed in socialist nations though.

They won't. They likely barely even exist as a demographic and what little good they could provide to the movement is outweighed by the huge amount of bad they do to it. Mark my words: you will never EVER get the average worker to join you until you join the alt-right in their mocking of these clowns. And you would be very surprised how approachable the average worker is even in the deep south where you would assume Socialism would be impossible. Most people in America are actually fairly reasonable and can likely be convinced to support us if only you have rational discourse with them with occasional jokes, memes, and mocking of your enemies (in our case idpol fags and corporations, both of which the average worker fucking hates with a passion). You shit on idpol, and corporations, support the prots owning guns, and talk about how the divisiveness in America is from corporations using divide and conquer tactics and you will win the hearts of the average white male worker.

Inciting others to suicide is a standard imageboard practice. Claiming that because it is immediately followed by an attack on transgender ontology suddenly renders it verboten means you're asserting that a specific class of person should be immune to that practice.

Nice try, Zig Forums.

That's a lie and you know it. East Germany not only had trans people, but they were treated better than they were in West Germany.

...

We still have Cuba user

Attached: 1368046711383.png (1500x1383, 126.36K)

When did I say that they should be immune at any point? Since you want to play the game of ignoring logical inferrences I never actually stated my position on whether or not said poster should be banned, I merely offered a reason why it was most likely banned

he*

Deserved bans

Ridiculous post but undeserved ban, user should have elaborated his position

inexplicable ban

Fuck no. Idpol goes both ways

I don't see how is bannable. You could ask him to elaborate on it or define what he meant, "trans marxist" is a stupid term if that's what he is talking about or maybe he has a materialist view of gender or simply views Engel's views as incompatible with the idea of transgenderism.

At 3 minutes in this documentary from the DPRK they call Michael Kirby a "mentally and morally corrupt pervert who has been a gay for more than 40 years." Homosexuality and trans are something that exist under capitalism not under Socialism.
youtube.com/watch?v=sRnEjs0GZgo

You want your left idpol, but not your right idpol? Fuck off, cryptolib.

Marxist truly means nothing any more.