Are there any good, unbiased sources about the thought of Mao?

Attached: that feistiness of yours is a turn on.png (242x509, 203.95K)

The Gang of Four should have disposed of Mao in 1968, finished the Cultural Revolution without him, and ensured China go all the way to agricultural communism instead of obsessing over productive forces.

t. Lin Biao

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democracy

Attached: trashman.jpg (324x249 30.3 KB, 21.3K)

YOU DREAMED OF SCENES
LIKE YOU READ OF IN MAGAZINE

Unironically this, the Gang of Four did nothing wrong. He may have had the foresight to realize that Deng and the roaders were planning on turning China into the capitalist mess it was, but when it came down to it he wasn't ready to fully allow the Cultural Revolution to reach course

this is an autist who doesnt' realize the way in which society's base material causes merge with rather than simply override the cultural and ideological forms of the actual society that goes on within.
stop being vulgar

When reading Mao I tend to be thinking "wow how did this smart-as-fuck motherfucker make so many mistakes?". It's maddening.

Some years ago (when I was moving towards leftism though not quite there yet) I got through about half of a biography called "Mao: The Real Story", which was at least partly a response to Jung Chang's polemic-disguised-as-biography. It's stated purpose is to present the facts about Mao for the reader to make conclusions rather than to guide them to one. It's quite dry but pretty comprehensive. I also remember coincidentally seeing something on the internet implying the author Pantsov is a leftist, but I can't find it now. Could have been another person with the same name.

Fanshen is supposedly very good, though it's about the land reform rather than Mao himself.