Where were you when this man destroyed all ☭TANKIE☭s and ML?

That was actually defended by Stirner lmao


I believe I asked you this already but you were a prot right ?

Attached: DQ4hB6JX4AAPmp2.jpg (1024x695, 138K)

Your thinking about the other user, I'm the one that was raised Catholic. While my beliefs have changed to be more existentialist, I dislike the term protestant because it implies a belief in Sola fide and that I want to take the church into a new direction of belief, while in actuality I want to take the church back to its roots to a more authentic and community based form of faith as the apostles practiced.

Why do you think this authentic Christian community is recoverable and also that this community is what you truly have in mind right now? That this idea you have isn't an inauthentic, postmodern pastiche which is more or less a farcical reiteration? I'm probably sounding more like I'm badgering you than I intend to.

I believe such a community is recoverable but necessitates the abolishment of capitalism first as such a community would require the re-engaging of universal brotherly ties and the formation of a community of love, things that I do not see possible with the alienation of capitalism. I would hope farcical reiteration would be prevented by each person's authentic encounter with Christ and their desire of "becoming", but I understand what you are saying in the danger of attempting to mimic such early Christian communities exactly, which is why I do not call for such mimicry. What I ask is a return to the very roots of the faith, not for it's bones but for it's spirit. I ask not for a copy of structure but for the re-engaging of ties and of communal love. I do not pretend that it will look or share the same exact make-up, but like how early primitive communism birthed from it the idea of property that would inevitably lead to capitalism and capitalism a communism which will differ in structure from the communism of before, so too do I see a similar the remergence of an authentic christianity from the church of now from which itself emerged from an early community of love.

But that's actually true.

Why would these ties lead to or necessitate a return to Christianity? Also, it could alternatively be that Christian groups form mystic hierarchies that roughly mime organized religion as it is currently, with priestly interpreters and laymen rather than each feeling an individual, authentic relation. Would the nonexistence of property create a decentralizing, individualizing effect on religion? Or something else, possibly in addition or separate from the property relations?

So USA and capitalist West are right?

Choose your words carefully.

Attached: 9fef4e663138c0e7a1dc321b69f15985c7a41650b3697244c1f3d8e28756af9e.jpg (1024x595, 73.58K)

In the sense that they have the capacity to dictate what is right and wrong due to their positions of power? Yes, they are.

This isn't a particularly new observation on society.

Wanna point out for the non-knowing there is no known photograph of Max Stirner.

If you refute him you're in denial. You could say something something "the ego is a spook" but the idea of anarchy without law is the objectively correct ideology.