Then you're definition of the sexual proletariat does not include the unemployed, and it also includes any chad that works (or is this your new found petite bourgeoisie!).
But regardless, chad's (men who have heterosexual intercourse?) don't just "take" women, they don't kidnap them and rape them. The women choose them. They aren't just some resource that needs to be distributed according to a certain rule. The whole point of communism is to liberate people from simply being seen as a means to an end, and this includes women as much as it does men.
Marx would be aghast at such moralism.
There is no such mechanism or power that "chad's" wield to do such a thing. Unlike actual bourgeoisie they don't give out wages, they don't control the distribution of sex by women. Women do.
There's that moralism again. Marx's description of exploitation was a scientific one, that it's theft is only because it aligns with our preconceived notions of theft. You've described no such process.
Yet again, in your description of "bribing", your only so called evidence for it being as such is that some people fuck women who were not someone's number one choice. Even if the sexual distribution was completely random this would remain the case. That some woman must aim lower due to rejection is the same as the process that occurs in men.
you call this class consciousness? Buddy…
Congratulations user you've just discovered the false consensus effect, what a marvelous trick of ideological analysis.
I don't think that sexual success can really come down to personal failure. Some people are born less attractive, less wealthy, socially awkward or are given handicaps due to structural circumstances. We can mitigate the ones that are due to society. The ones that come from biology we'll just have to learn how to live with, and develop strategies accordingly. Simply oppressing women is not a valid strategy for any liberatory project.
This implies that the sexual proletariat /created/ that pussy, which is simply not the case.
Also lol at blaming first world chad's for the problems of colonized incels. The biggest mismatches in gender and sex in the developing world are from traditional and patriarchal attitudes encouraging families to abort daughters and only have sons!
washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-many-men/
This is where your project not only makes this situation worse for women, but incels themselves! In a world where you can tell what gender your baby is going to be, and you also live in a patriarchal society, you'd be absolutely mad to give birth to a baby girl! On the other hand, if you systematically encourage more women to be born, you also give them more political power in numbers even if you increase the sexual worth of men. The overall best solution remains gender equality and communism!
Attached: I would prefer not to zizek 3.jpg (705x438, 43.33K)