excellent post
Socialism is fucking Stupid
William Ross
Jose Anderson
Imperialism is capitalism in fact its the highest stage of it!
Lincoln Howard
An inevitable result of free-market, unregulated capitalism.
See pic 1, also I wonder what your piddly dozen AR-15s and M-60s are gong to do against a full blown tank, APC or any other armored, armed vehicle, or better yet an entire MOB of people, OR EVEN BETTER YET a drone strike.
Private armies in a society where people are supposed to be socially equal, it's not like private armies means you have power to influence and affect other peoples liberties!
By and large liberals have opposed guns, socialists have supported them.
Want more evidence? In the USSR not only were hunting weapons allowed but all students were given pre-military training. There was a class called Basic Military Training. For grades 9 and 10. Teacher would usually be a retired military officer. One would have to take apart an AK (model depending on the military standard of the current year) and learn to do it within 30 seconds. They would also be taught to fire small-caliber rifles either semi-auto or bolt action on a range, that could be 25-100 meters. I doubt there was ever something like Columbine in the USSR and accidental deaths by guns either. (Meanwhile in the enlightened Britain one has to register a goddamn flare gun and/or antique fire-arm or have it rendered inoperable). In fact the State encouraged civilian gun use and even awarded good marksmanship with the Stalin-era award, Voroshilov's Sharpshooter, awarded to over 700,000 people.
Notice how the wiki page on gun control in the Soviet Union has messed up sourcing, talking about gun control beginning in 1929 while sourcing decrees of 1918 and 1920 (When the USSR was not even in existence yet). “Policemen were responsible for gun control,” writes Katherine Bliss Eaton in Daily Life in the Soviet Union (Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004): "Private citizens and institutions could own hunting weapons if they had police permission and registered their guns at the local station house. The militia could confiscate weapons and ammunition from people who showed signs of dangerously irresponsible behavior." Sounds reasonable to me. Hunting was common-place and was regulated only within the prevention of harming population, (Now take a look at Russia with its capitalism, wonderful over there, isn't it). Not to mention sport's use which were managed by DOSAAF, which is why soviet snipers were some of the world's best.
articles.latimes.com
cia.gov
You won't unless you have to (i.e. regulations) or you need to if you don;t want them to riot on your doorstep, that is literally the only reason benefits from companies exist today, a mix of company initiative to prevent more strikes and riots and government crack-down on the monopolies that had developed due to the lack of regulations.
Continuation upcoming, your shit show is so bad it require several posts
Christopher Ward
Btw:
Like how the Americans lied to themselves that everything was fine in Vietnam,and the hundreds of other humanitarian disasters that imperialist wars gave us?
You say this, yet capitalism has been equally as disastrous, it's just that many of these disasters have gone relatively unnoticed except for the great depression.
Benjamin Bell
Not an argument. That great service that was provided by a large collective of workers. Not just Mark Zuckerberg. Why should Mark Zuckerberg get all the money and glory?
I take it you are a computer engineer? Since you used that as an example. How does it feel being a classcuck for not just your employer but most likely a Jewish employer? Since Jews dominate Silicon Valley. And Silicon Valley is full of SJWs too now as well. Since SJWism is not incompatible with capitalism. In fact capitalism wants to be inclusive as possible. They want to sell a product to browns and women.
Dylan Rogers
Nothing in Laissez-Faire capitalism that requires the productive to be rewarded, and the lazy to be punished. You can inherit a **** ton of money, and be a lazy cunt, and be rewarded for it, and you can work 80 hours a week and earn a penny. That's all possible in Laissez-Faire capitalism, and is pretty common in many mixed-market capitalist societies today. Incentives exist past monetary gain. We, as a society, must pass the obsession with materialistic incentives which is provided by capitalist indoctrination throughout our entire young, scholastic livesIn a communist society, the general welfare of the state (which is comprised of the proletariat) is of top priority. People do not struggle to survive and succeed their birth-given socio-economic status so much because no-one is more or less advanced than you in any meaningful way.The work is distributed to the strong, able, and appropriate, and the incentive to discover and invent is to leave a mark on mankind and to improve society as a whole, as extreme wealth is not a given option for this mark, mostly because it is not needed. It persuades the individual to seek scholastic advancement and make scientific discoveries by removing the Capitalist-added incentive to simply gain money and buy extravagant things and act ostentatiously to gain fame/ recognition. The idea is to pass the predatory phase of society and establish a more peaceful, academically-oriented society that champions general welfare and scientific/mathematic advancement as opposed to championing income inequality and profit. Having a state simply means this can be given more complexity and structure without fear of collapse.
PS
Corporatism - the control of a state or organization by large interest groups. Literally does not conflict with the definition of capitalism. Nationalization is also not the same as socialization
Luis Campbell
You misunderstand, they're paying for you to be a NEET and posting that on screen, whilst actual work isn't