In defense of the other

I’ve noticed myself becoming extremely defensive of Socialist experiments regardless of policies. Particularly with anarchist and ML societies.
While Rosa is my cup of tea, whenever nonsocialists insult the USSR or CNT-FAI, I can’t stop but defend them. Personally I see that defense of these socialists experiments should be made, even if you hate them personally, when nonsocialists talk about them in a disrespectful manner, thoughts?

Attached: 59288CDA-141C-4248-944D-3E9464492D43.jpeg (1280x720, 120.37K)

It's amazing how quickly liberals and rightards fold when they play the "socialism was never tried amirite xD" card and you immediately respond with "actually, it has been tried in the USSR and has worked very well, despite many flaws". They either drop the topic immediately or devolve into autistic screeching about gorillions. It's great and everyone should do it even if you have certain disagreements with Soviet policies.

Attached: 7b65a.jpg (402x303, 22.22K)

This is almost always the correct line, at the very, very least in the case of the USSR.

I should also further my reasoning. The rightest approach to anti-socialism is typically the USSR, but falangists I notice hammer hard against the CNT-FAI MORE than they do the USSR (Mexican Nationalists do the same but for the Zapatistas). So I find it best to prepare yourself for anti-Communist slander, even if it’s anti-anarchist.

you better defend Not Socialism too then, cuckold

National socialism was so threatening to intentional capital they allied with communism (ussr) to bring it down(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Criticism against socialist experiments should primarily be made within the movement. Anything else is shooting yourself in the foot. To liberals the socialist movement except the obvious red-headed step-children like Gonzalo and Pol Pot should be defended and the very real successes should be proclaimed. Because liberals don't give a shit about nuance, so it's better to take a stand.

Honestly the best criticism you can make against any attempts at socialism to a liberal is to show the fact that most pro-market reforms in the east-block where pretty terrible and caused a lot of the problems in the latter years.

right cuck:
left chad:

Attached: enjoyingaglisteningfruittrianglewithmygoodfriendjackiechan.jpg (300x360, 74.98K)

What privatises your industry did prints MEFO bills he destroys trade unions mean massively increases corporate profits by takes massive loans and donations from international finance capital this?

Attached: VOLKISCH privatisation.PNG (1574x75, 5.25K)

Imagine actually believing this.

Attached: 2564278e9d223aba2b353356ce562799.406x406x1.jpg (406x406, 38.57K)

you mean he defrauded German porkies and basically straight up robbed them? :^)
like the Soviets? :^)
like the Soviets and their lend lease program with american Jewish porkies? :^)

defend Not Socialism or you're just another red liberal porky :)

Cuck, go back to your sewers

the USSR never banned or suppressed trade unions, they were active throughout its history. In fact the soviet government was initially formed on the basis of trade unions and made up of trade unionists. Hitler had trade unionists killed, suppressed wages, reduced living conditions, increased working hours and set up a porky front 'state trade union' the one proposal of which 'worker representatives on corporate boards' was eternally vetoed by porkies in the DAF.
Lend-lease was actually interest free and even then the soviets never actually bothered to pay the americans or the anglos back

Now you better get back to deepthroating zionist porkies just like uncle adolf, your favourite corporate cocksucker ;^)

Attached: millions.jpg (558x800, 78.7K)

I do the same thing. It's very weird to attack Stalin and online tanks and then defend him from exaggerated right-wing slander to normies irl on the same day, but you get used to it.

Stalin is a Jungian archetype.

Attached: Peterson.webm (854x480, 1.29M)

Why do Falangists attack anarchists more than the USSR? What makes Anarchists more of a “threat” to them compared to MLs? Does it relate to the Spanish Civil War?

Who controls the British pound?

Attached: Peterson.webm (854x480, 1.29M)

Rightists want you to say "not true socialism" so they can instantly call you an utopian who doesn't understand basic economics and smugly claim victory. They do not prepare for whatever comes afterwards, and against USSR apologism they simply have no arguments. Say "socialism got man into space" and you'll shut up 99% of Zig Forumsacks.

That's why Muke, hbomber and other leftist e-celebs who are unwilling to defend the USSR are fags playing by rightist rules for liberal cred, and will never be taken seriously.

*German rocket scientists

Good. Keep doing this. You will get better and better at it, and if you learn the smallest amount of history you can destory the liberal lies and get bitches in doing so

just to be clear, no matter what your sect, if its far left, and somebody is trying to smear it, just defend it. Mr 80 gorrillion doesn't give a fuck what faction you are, in fact its best to learn the arguments from all the factions and tailor them to your target. Doesn't have to be left unity, just has to shit on liberalism

Burgers also imported German rocket scientists yet they lost the space race in every aspect except landing on the Moon. Really makes u think

Russian rocket scientists didn't need the nazi. America needed the nazis.

Attached: Peterson.webm (854x480, 1.29M)

Attached: Шиф-кэт.jpg (800x640, 130.54K)

As communists, it is our duty to defend every single communist movement, figure, or ideology in front of liberals and reactionaries.

Criticizing from the left (like Rosa did to Lenin and Bordiga did to Stalin) in front of other leftists is fine.

I actually kinda sincerely unironically believe that it was a hoax to prove to the world that capitalism was greater than socialism