Capitalism is Jewish Usury

realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/capitalism-is-jewish-usury/

(William III of Orange, who made the migration of Jewish Capitalism from Amsterdam to Britain possible.)

Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is ‘return on investment’. This is an extension of the ‘time value’ of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury.

Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it unavoidable that the very richest own everything in generations.

And this is indeed what happened: Capitalism is one huge global monopoly. All the major banks own each other and most Transnationals plus a huge chunk of land. This juggernaut was built with the plunder of Usury.

We have all seen that Rothschild was worth 50 billion in 1850. At 5% per year, this fortune would now be a trillion, at 8% per year Rothschild would now be worth hundreds of trillions.

This is why it has been said that ‘compound interest is the strongest force in the Universe’.
This is Usurious Usurpation.

The Rise of Capitalism
Modern Capitalism was first clearly visible in the Dutch Republic, where Italian Banking, expelled Iberian Jews, the Reformation, naval power and the acquisition of huge trade fortunes came together in the Amsterdam Empire, which would outshine its much bigger Spanish, British and even French competitors until the mid seventeenth century.

Everything that defines modern Capitalism was either invented or came to fruition in Amsterdam. The first Stock Exchange, Multinationals (the East Indies Company, which would rule over Indonesia with unrestrained Corporatocracy for centuries), and most importantly, a Central Bank, the ‘Amsterdamsche Wisselbank’. And of course a huge pile of money, that would be the envy of Europe even long after its ‘glory’ had subsided.
Amsterdam also saw the first bubble: the Tulip mania, 1637. This typical banker device, blowing bubbles with easy credit and then popping them by calling in loans, would haunt Western economies for centuries to come.

The Dutch Republic resulted from a Calvinist rebellion against Catholic Spain. Calvin is considered by many to have been Jewish. He openly defended Usury. This was in an era that the Medieval era of Usury prohibition was in terminal decline.

Calvinist thought was also infected by the typically Jewish notion that wealth is a sign of God’s favor.

Notwithstanding Usury prohibition, Jewish Usury had been a huge issue throughout the Middle Ages and it does not require a great leap of the imagination to see that Capitalism is in fact the modern equivalent of what was once known as Jewish Usury.

Jewish fortunes and their methods played a large part in Amsterdam. Their ships would also dominate the growing slave trade on America. They had come from Spain, after being expelled in 1492. Holland was known at the time for its ‘tolerance’.

Amsterdam was the first great star of high finance. Opulence acquired through trade became Capital, looking for returns. And here we see that Capitalism is about finance, not production or consumption. Finance rules over producers, workers, consumers, farmers, crafstmen and industrialists alike.

They lend to those they control or want to control and withhold credit to those for whom they have no purpose. Usury gives them their take of any venture. By keeping money scarce, they keep labor cheap. This is how money rules.

Moving on to Britain
Amsterdam peaked in 1648, when the peace of Westphalia ended both the 80 year war for independence with Spain and the 30 year war in Germany. But after the peak comes the decline and already in the fifties problems began to mount when Cromwell landed a blow on Dutch naval supremacy with the Acts of Navigation.
The Jews had been expelled from Britain in 1290. This was a few decades after the Magna Carta, which clearly points at Jewish Usury as a huge problem at the time.

Cromwell, who was a calvinist Puritan, negotiated extensively with Amsterdam Jews about resettlement. He probably was a tool of Jewish/Amsterdam finance to begin with.

Attached: dd8f9ba4b0c444c87cbdf26e6ddac07e3ccdaa722fb4612fa0958a8aa9f75b28.jpg (401x482, 63.15K)

Resettlement came with the promise of making London a better Amsterdam. And while British merchants (and many others too) were against the readmittance of the Jews, Cromwell went ahead anyway. The Puritans were optimistic and naive and thought they could ‘redeem’ the Jews. But while Jewish Capital indeed pushed Britain’s Empire to unprecedented heights, there was no redemption: by the end of the 19th century the British Aristocracy had been entirely Judaized.

While Cromwell, as a tool of Amsterdam Imperialism, ultimately failed, the Jews did not relent and they had a second shot at London with the Glorious Revolution, when William III of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, became William III of Britain and the Dutch Republic and England were united in a personal union.
He repaid his financial backers by chartering the Bank of England in 1694 and this was the official entry of Capitalism in Britain. It came with the end of sovereign money and the ascent of Gold: until then the British economy had been financed with Talley Sticks, simple pieces of wood issued by the King. British partners in the Bank paid for their shares with them, but the first thing the Bank did was take them out of circulation. The Bank of England is only the eigth bank in history and is the second oldest to survive today.

The United States
The real history of the United States is not about the War of Independence and the Constitution. It’s about banking.

The United States did not revolt over ‘taxes without representation’. According to Benjamin Franklin the real reason for the War of Independence was that Whitehall forced scarce money through Britain’s Gold Standard on the Colonies, who had thrived with their own Colonial Scrip. A depression was the inevitable result.

Only a few years after nominal independence, Hamilton’s first Bank of the United States brought Capitalism to the United States. It was closed in 1800, but in 1816, in the aftermath of the war with Britain, a second Bank of the United States (a privately owned corporation) was opened with a 20 year charter.

The heroic President Andrew Jackson did not renew this charter and miraculously survived an attempt on his life. His last words, ‘I killed the Bank’ still ring triumphantly through the ages. Unfortunately, he failed to replace it with a decent monetary system and the country was plunged in a depression because of a tanking money supply.

This left the Whigs, Abraham Lincoln prominently among them, plenty of scope to campaign for a new ‘National’ Bank, which came in the aftermath of the Civil War.

In 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank was founded. This privately owned corporation is owned by primarily Jewish ‘member banks’. The presidents of the Federal Reserve are always Jewish and by far most of its board members are too. It’s no secret Wall Street is run by the  Jews and is now the global standard bearer of Jewish Usury with derivatives being the scam du jour.

Of course there are Americans in Wall Street too, just as there are Englishmen in the City or Germans in Deutsche Bank, but whereas these nationalities compete amongst each other, the Jews are strong in all nations and this gives them supremacy.

Equally true is that the Jewish many gain nothing from the banking prowess of their ‘elites’. They may have some privileges, but on the other hand they’re also easily duped into nasty affairs or sacrificed like the pawns we all are.

But considering the above history of Capitalism and Jewish Usury, it is very hard to avoid the conclusion that they are the same thing.
Conclusion

YHVH emphatically orders the Jews several times to conquer the world with Usury in Deutoronomy, for instance: “15:6 For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee.”

Pivotal documents from the medieval era squarely point at Jewish Usury. We have already mentioned the Magna Carta, but there is also for instance the Quran: ‘That they (the Jews) took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men’s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment.’ (sura 4.161)

Capitalism and its ‘return on investment’ is clearly the successor of medieval Jewish Usury. It arose during the destruction of medieval Usury prohibition. Its typical devices, Usury, Banking, the Stock Exchange, asset bubbles, Transnationals, all were already present in Amsterdam. It was this force that migrated to Britain and the US. It was in these three financial Empires that Captitalism showed its unrestrained imperialist designs.

Attached: karl-marx-652769.jpg (640x916, 140.26K)

is this a fucking nazbol gang thread

Already the poor lose up to 50% of their income to Usury, mostly passed on by producers in prices. The middle classes are somewhat better off, but they are being decapitated everywhere. Usury only benefits the richest 10%, while most of the money ends up with the ‘fabulously’ wealthy.

The enslavement is total: most people work the first two and half days of the week to pay off the bank. Even if they have no debts.
And we face not only enslavement, but extinction. Mass immigration, combined with the demographic catastrophy caused by the trinity of feminism, the not-so-gay lobby, and sexual ‘liberation’, is now threatening to actually destroy the white race. Whites are expected to be a minority all over the West in 2050/2060 and irrelevant by the end of the century.

Capitalism is the core of the Jewish Question. All their other depravities, including Zionism and (Cultural) Marxism were built and financed from the Capitalist powerbase.

The Jewish Question can only be reasonably resolved by reforming money and ending its rule through Usury.

Attached: 51gwEWtpSXL._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (313x499, 34.75K)

This is a Marxist thread. Karl Marx has been saying this shit. I refer you to the pictoquote in the second post.

I find it amusing that Zig Forums won't acknowledge the Jewish origins of capitalism. I tried to red-pill them but failed. Right-wingers are apologists of a Jewish ideology. And even when you point the proof in their face that capitalism was invented by Jews in Amsterdam, they won't listen. They just believe what Fox News and Breitbart tell them to believe. And they adopt antisemitism in order to appear edgy. And then when you can see their support for Donald Trump (who was cuckolded by Jews for God's sake) you can tell that their antisemitism isn't serious.

DAMN FUCKING RIGHT
to be real tho why does this even matter?

I mean why focus on a few people and banking when capitalism is much more than that?
For fucks sake explain to me what this all means.

GANG GANG GANG GANG GANG GANG
it's just for OP to push his hatred of jews or something

Attached: seize the means of my dick you gay jew lol.jpg (480x360, 64.31K)

Judaism is an anti-communist in so far as it is anti universalist ideology and just like every ideology we need to critique. Not a cultural relativist tho so I’d definitely argue Judaism is worse than most other ideologies present in the west

Antisemitism on this board is still flourishing.

Never change, /nazbolpol/.

I get the sense that our anti-semitism is more genuine than Zig Forums's. Zig Forums refuses to accept the redpill about capitalism for some reason. They have received tons of anti-Marxist, "cultural marxist" conditioning from Fox News, Breitbart and right-wing sources on the internet over the years that they refuse to accept that capitalism wast in fact invented by crypto-Jews in Amsterdam.

I might actually have crypto-Jewish ancestry myself since I am Hispanic. But I see Christianity as superior to Judaism (though I am atheist). Jesus Christ spoke out against the money lenders. He forbid usury. And usury is ruining the world. I am also intact and eat pork and what not. Having a bit of Jewish blood isn't destiny. Usury and circumcision are evil.

A geniune universalism would not exclude Jews or Judaism but see truth in Judaism as it sees truth in all religions and cultures.

Once again, this board conflates "universalist" with "idpol for white Xtians".

Only the Eastern and Roman churches are against usury. Protestantism only became a thing due to the growing German bourgeoisie who wanted to lessen the power of Rome in order to have a moneylending market system.

Wanted to add: Christianity isn't even that universalist to begin with. Like the Jews, Christians believe *they* are the Chosen People, they are the ones who are privileged before God, etc. Hence why Christians spend so much time and effort missionizing. You're not saved by your deeds, you're "saved by grace" which means acting like a self-righteous asshole gets you into Heaven moreso than breaking your back for others.

t. Grew up Christian, would not recommend. Badiou is a flaming idiot.

Protestantism never banned usury? I guess that's why the Jew bankers fled to London and Amsterdam. Since the Brits are Protestant. And I think the Dutch too.

I was raised Catholic. We banished the Jews from Iberia 500+ years ago. Or forced them to convert to Catholicism. So basically Protestants are the kikes of Christianity?

Jesus Christ threw the money lenders out of the temple. How on earth could Protestants allow usury knowing this?

I’m not a Christian and I wasn’t raised one either but yes you’re right genuine universalism would try to find the good in Judaism. That’s the purpose of critique; we can hold nothing sacred and sort the good from the bad.

t. Grew up Protestant
Not every Christian follows Sola Fide

Attached: StepUpProt.jpg (564x423, 34.3K)

Protestantism is the true basis of capitalism, not Judaism. Jews actually have to give a fuckton of their money away in tithing.


Christianity is still not truly universalist. You HAVE to convert to Christianity or else face hellfire and/or be demonized. Even the Jews don't do this nor do they even believe in hell to begin with.

Which Hispanic? Mexican? Colombian?

do you think we Zig Forums users are "capitalist"?
While some of them might be, we are mostrly nationalsocialist,

Nice meme

So, capitalist.

wew

Nazi Germany was capitalism. They had private ownership of the means of production. Did they not? And by private I mean that private corporations were allowed to have employees. Which is rent-seeking and usury. It wasn't just sole proprietorship or having a 1-man corporations.

State regulated capitalism does not mean socialism. That is what we call a mixed-economy. And we have a mixed-economy today as well. In a socialist country, it is illegal for a private entity to employ employees. Unless it's a single corporation with just 1 employee. I have a corporation myself with just 1 employee. Because it's more beneficial for the businessman to incorporate than to have a sole proprietorship.

I think its unfair the lump the 4 together, only Friedman was respected, and even then only within economic circles, he is currently hated by every non-economist academic.

Attached: neolib.PNG (1919x497, 73.08K)

on top of this, if you look into history of economics journals, socialdemocratic fundamentalists are over-represented as authors, and try to establish a false dichotomy of market vs state / keynes vs hayek