Prejudiced thinking is cost effective. You dont have the privilege to think for enough time, or you dont have all the information at all times. Racist worldview is correct enough to work most of the time.
Enjoy having a pack of feral minorities and peaceful muslims move in your neighborhood, its not the privileged leftists who have to deal with that shit, which is why working classes and right wing populism are one and the same throughout all developed world.
It's not 'devastating', it makes perfect sense. Correlation is a two way street, so it is not inherently politically incorrect.
The idiocy of hard racial determinism has nothing to do with the validity of g.
It is costly as well. Wide hips are required to birth large heads, slowing running speed. Complex brains take longer to develop, delaying age of maturity. etc.
There is no reason to assume that selective pressures for intelligence are globally uniform. Chimpanzees might also benefit from human intelligence, but that is not how evolution works, Chimpanzees have not been under the same selective pressure for intelligence as humans, just as tropical human populations have not been under the same selection for intelligence as North Eurasian human populations.
Not an argument.
These things are an expression of my biology and can't be helped.
Species is a social construct which is meaningless in our current global racial competition. The alien races are biologically incapable to perpetuating anything like the world which we have created, they only serve as agents of entropy, decaying and corrupting what nature has so carefully and cruelly wrought. Why should 40,000 years of the uniquely brutal evolutionary pressure which has forged us be thrown away because of your cowardice?
In capitalism they literally keep apartments empty and burn food to keep an illusion of scarcity.
Co-operation is much better for everyone involved. Think of how many white germans died in a war that was the result of Hitler trying to exterminate non-whites. Or how many southerners died in american civil war because some of them refused to treat africans as equals. Or how hard it is for you to get laid if you spout your racist shit in public. To me it seems that your ideology is not very good at preserving the genes of it's supporters. If you really believe in living by the rules of evolution, then do like the animal kingdom and adapt.
Trust me, don't try. All you're gonna get from that dipshit is prevarication, repetition, and condescension
Selective pressure did exist, which is why Homo sapiens is still alive and the archaic human species are not. For the most part, modern humans have been as biologically smart as they are for tens of thousands of years.
I am not arguing that people are all magically the same, as much as I am extremely skeptical that this example of human differences in particular is meaningful. Denying human difference may be denying evolution, but to deny environmental influence as significant is to deny physics.
Literally who? Even sub-Saharan Africans were able to maintain civilization in places like East Africa during the middle ages. China and East Asia are soaring ahead of the west in the fields of biosciences, robotics, high-speed infrastructure, and artificial intelligence.
Besides, why should I even care about my "race" in the first place? I exist and live as an individual, not as a group. And while groups can diminish. It doesn't necessarily infringe upon my own well being.
The Manchu minority ruled China for centuries. The British did similar in India. Neither were particularly bad off, and in fact enjoyed living standards far above those of the natives.
Even if I were to be last remaining "white" person on the planet, it wouldn't necessarily entail a miserable existence. And ultimately, if the continuation of civilization were to be my concern, I'd focus on persons of ability, which can be found among every "race".
All this talk about race karma, race loyalty, tribal competition, etc. ultimately rings hollow considering that in the end we are competing as individuals. And my "allies" at any one time are not limited to a particular tribe, race, clan, what-have-you, etc.
Except it's wrong most of the time, and divides the working class where there would otherwise be a collective struggle. Racism is hurting the lower classes more than helping it.
And this doesn't follow. It's a a false dichotomy where you're either a racial essentialist unwilling to recognize the unique qualities of individuals, or you have to accept being overrun by "orcs".
And yet it's the working classes that suffer as the result of racism, nationalism, etc. Today, just as they did in the previous century. FYI I'm not even a leftist.
Why do you keep insisting on the intelligence thing when you already said in the thread that it is irrelevant and you would keep being racist even if your claims were debunked? Anyway heres something we know about Autism Level today:
en.wikipedia.org
Besides, there are several Autism Level-tests out there, and while they at least claim to standardize the test result median to 100, there arent official regulations or rules for what can be called an Autism Level test. So Autism Level-score doesnt really mean anything unless you also know which test was used and which year's edition was it.
I don't like the argument of I Q being worthless, it is a very handy metric when used properly. As in, not by people who have already decided that nonwhites are inferior and are trying to justify this view.
IQ is important but all the upper echelons of that system are not really meaningful.
IQ is only meaningful if it's too low, but once it gets to 100 and beyond, things change.
For example, all humans need to keep shitting and pissing and "whites" are the ultimate agriculturists, you can't eat maths or verbal guile unless someone trades you shit for it.
That said, "whites" are also excellent in the alleged "weaker fiels" as well.
Agriculture trumps all though.