Socialism

Misinterpreting someone's point this blatantly doesn't actually make your argument look stronger.


I detect Zig Forums larping.

I don't see how I misinterpreted anything. Either way I'm pretty sure this is a troll

Yeah.

Look now I'm OP

I am just aware that jews are capable of creating texts which will be impossible for my imperfect brain to falsify. What's the point of reading their work when I can just watch youtube talks which are both understandable and completely relatable, amren has some new videos btw.

You are correct my fellow man

as long as the fixed capital remains then it shouldn't be a problem, however i imagine a scorched earth policy has been employed. i'm just surprised the govt has not brute forced the country into production.

Stop trying to impersonate me, pinkos. No one yet in this thread has debunked my assertion that
SOCIALISM DOESN'T WORK
and has always failed. Let's look at some failures…

um sweaty x you forgot

Attached: b5dfd808a16a9550c4c20e32a33c43344ace93e9649547aefeffa6cd1a297540.jpg (600x532, 40.19K)

Any state eventually fails. What matters is what was done in the mean time. Compared to capitalist countries in the region with similar GDPs, Cuba is able to provide a much nicer quality of life for it's citizens with a much lower environmental impact. North Korea had a famine in the 1990s, but as you may have been able to infer from there still being North Koreans, they dealt with their food crisis. Henry Kissinger encouraged the USA to support Cambodia, and the rule of the Khmer Rouge was ended by an invasion by (communist) Vietnam. The USSR never was able to match the west in consumer goods production, but they did manage to do things like replace half of their housing stock in a decade without foreign assistance.

Attached: 53e48875d53181f22f7067be89361b6492bd33ce.gif (720x480, 5.92M)