Can you have a socialist kingdom? None of this congress, party, faux democratic nonsense. A government with clear plans...

Can you have a socialist kingdom? None of this congress, party, faux democratic nonsense. A government with clear plans, clear authority, and clear action.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (435x495, 230.5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

worldbulletin.net/m/islamic-history/127416/the-qarmatians-the-worlds-first-enduring-communistic-society
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Fuck off, brainlet.

the incas were a non market society, but that doesn't make them socialist, i think a third of all food growth was to be given to the priest and ruling classes, which sound pretty non socialist to me

How would it be feudalism if the workers own the means of production?

read chapter 51 of capital iii

yeah we know a bit more about the incas than marx did, that's a what a century and a half does to archaeology research, there was literally a rentier class in the incan empire

But we should get rid of a rentier class if we can help it, since we aren't spooked by religion anymore.

excellent post

EVERY
MAN
A
KING

Attached: huey grows stronger.jpg (1200x1200, 67.38K)

This

...

What does national mulattoism have to do with getting rid of religion?

How can the Worker own the means of production if the King owns everything?

INCA PRIMER ESTADO SOCIALISTA EN EL MUNDO JAJAJAJJAJ EUROPEOS SUCIOS Y SALVAJES COPIANDOSE DE LOS INCAS JAJAJAJAJAJJAAJAJ BARBAROS APRENDANSE A BAÑAR AJAJJAJAJAJAJA

Great. LARPing indians is the last thing Zig Forums needed to be complete stew of weird ideologies

Cáyese ya perro sarnoso y aprenda a bañarse jajajajjajajaja cómo se siente necesitar a copiar los incas para poder tener una sociedad avanzada¿¿ jajajjajajaj

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (577x353, 305.85K)

racism is so funny right? but its just ironic so its ok XDDD

ay bendito que te pasa hamburguesa¿¿¿ jajajajja cómo se siente ser inferior jjajjajxjajjaj

ps bañate amigo

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (197x195, 73.43K)

THE INCA EMPIRE IS ACTUALLY EXISTING SOCIALISM

we wuz socialist

NEO-INCA MARKETLESS INTERNAZBOL KINGDOM WHEN?

EL SAPA INCA BAJARÁ DEL CIELO PARA INSTAURAR UN IMPERIO SOCIALISTA MUNDIAL Y DIVINO

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (901x583, 986.73K)

HAIL THE GREAT INCA

DEFENDER OF THE REVOLUTION

Attached: inca soc 04.png (1000x1000 310.79 KB, 304.77K)

INCAN SOCIALISM IS
SCIENCE
FACT

Attached: incan socialism 05.png (640x347 941.09 KB, 161.12K)

Incas and Khmer Rouge were actually existing monarcho-com gang

Attached: norodom_sihanouk_khmer.png (1018x602, 613.05K)

worldbulletin.net/m/islamic-history/127416/the-qarmatians-the-worlds-first-enduring-communistic-society

Attached: P000031046_E000039474.jpg (1000x563, 398.79K)

ONE GOD, NO KINGS

Attached: winstanley2.jpg (1181x1661, 569.84K)

Literally pic related

Attached: slaves.png (1024x574 6.71 KB, 60.84K)

The so-called "King" can try and take it like a reactionary and get overthrown. His job is social planning not exploitation.

a socialist kingdom in the case of the incas is pseudo-primitive communism or advanced primitive communism

A king can achieve the same things as a dictator who can achieve the same things as a president who can achieve the same things as a violent uprising of the proletariat who seize the means of production who can achieve the same things as an AI who takes control over its human masters. The goal of the political system is to get shit done. The "shit getting done" can be the economic system socialism, and this can be achieved by any political system, even if it is harder for one political system to achieve this in place of another political system. A king can unironically be socialist if his goal is to get rid of debt-based currency, bring democracy to the workplaces, and grant equal ownership of the means of production to all people under his rule. One might say stalin was a true socialist, yet he ruled with an iron fist. He was fair but he had immense power over the people living "below" him in soviet russia. I believe there have been socialist presidents but they were hardly ever able to achieve actual socialism because of the restrictions that the ballot box held over them. As somebody who believes that socialism is human nature, I am inclined to believe that the Incan federation was, indeed, socialist, even though they obviously didn't know about the concept of socialism, even if they had a state religion, even if they had a king. Anyone who disagrees with this is most likely a revisionist who wants to mislead us from the fact that socialism is human nature because authoritarian political systems have always existed alongside it. Some people accuse the incan federation of having a renter's class. I'll believe it when i see hard evidence for it, otherwise i am inclined to believe that this is a revisionist lie being told by those archaeologists who work for capitalist gain. Fuck imperialist revisionists.

Attached: e52372597fac29313072bde2a7ead157318ed1e5478131495fc4bb6c805250e1-b.png (1615x787, 128.38K)

You admit your usage of the term "king" is spurious, why use it?
Also, what the fuck do you mean by social planning? This is just nazbol shit isn't it

Attached: DcoMHDVXkAAwS5O.jpg (300x471, 44.96K)

Are planned economies and societies out of style now?

Social planning normally mean eugenics and totalitarian control of the populace. Economic planning is what you meant and in the end are you merely relabeling a dictator.

Attached: 1527528656428.jpg (969x800, 267.36K)

thots have no revolutionary potential. yes /mu/'s pale skinny black haired waifu (ugggghhhh that sounds so good tho tbh) is a thot. they must be purged.