Walmart math

Walmart's CEO Doug McMillon makes $20,000,000 per year off the backs of his workers.

So let's redistribute his wealth! Walmart employs 2.1 million people. $20,000,000/2,100,000 is $9.52.

Congratulations, you gave a bunch of people an extra 10 bucks per year and made one guy broke.

Attached: WALMART.jpg (3014x2304, 888.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

foodfirst.org/publication/world-hunger-ten-myths/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Now recalculate that but add in every store manager, assistant store manager and all profits and dividends distributed to major stockholders plus board of directors.

of course leftypol neets think fucking managers are rolling cash.

we're not exactly redistributionists here but
the company makes billions in profit each year retard
there's more people profiting than just the CEO

Attached: kanna confusion.png (404x404, 117.71K)

And their shareholders get a profit of $127bn per year. Do the math with THAT and what you end up with is each worker getting an extra $61,000 per year.

It's not about CEO pay, dipshit. It's about all the wealth that is extracted from working people to enrich an idle few.

Yeah and the biggest chunk of those billions goes to employee pay and logistics. Not to the top brass.

Fug, shitposting flag.

It's not about whether they are rolling in cash or not, they are relative to the workers, but whether they or not they are needed.

Profit is after employee pay expenses you absolute retard

lmao walmart has literally millions of shareholders, wtf

dense are you
okay
profit comes AFTER expenses are paid
they made like 10 billion in profit in 2016

Attached: 1336916563157.jpg (534x512, 102.98K)

10 billion divided by millions of shareholders.

Yay let's take all the retirees' money

Attached: This entire argument is ridiculous.jpg (255x79, 4.45K)

if that's the huge issue here why don't we just get rid of the system that requires people to retire on flimsy ass stocks

Attached: 1458788854553.jpg (945x945, 179.76K)

Are you actually retarded?

not even once.

Yeah just like what all those socialist countries throughout history managed to do.

You're literally having to advocate something that hasn't been accomplished even then a majority of the country was on the socialists' side just to defend the lunacy of wealth redistribution.

So what is your solution, succdem-kun?

first of all, that's not even what I said, I implied getting rid of capitalist stock bullshit and markets controlling people's lives
and second of all
am I talking to fucking muke right now or something

Attached: 1352747441124.gif (853x480, 2.54M)

You're now literally suggesting we ban people from selling things

never go full socialist, bruh.

More social services. Make the 1% pay for those who can't afford necessities.

Look at Scandinavia ffs

WHERE EXACTLY DO YOU THINK WE ARE?

And only maybe 10 of them actually matter. Take the wealthiest out, nothing happens.

you have to go back

Attached: 281.jpeg (549x354, 195.95K)

Everything is so clear to me now.

UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: are you retarded.png (855x1008, 726.26K)

Ok, redistrubute those 10 dudes' wealth too. Now all walmart employees get an extra $100 for a year. Yaaay, in about 10 years they can all put a downpayment on a halfway decent car.

One guy out of millions, and one company out of thousands. Redistribute all of that, ordinary people will have 5x much than now.

...

And now do that with millions of people like them. Adds up, you moron?

Attached: 1f3fd3777ca309d408c4bd1c96633e9d49730fc9ddecec4b26f37df72fd014d6.png (663x960, 582.47K)

Attached: f03.jpg (1200x794, 215.77K)

Hey, succdem-kun, how isn't your ideology either an even less radical version of market socialism at best, or capitalism with a social safety net at worst?

Not really. Walmart is one of the most profitable companies in the world and redistributing all their wealth won;t even make a difference for the people they employ.

The world has 7 billion people in it and not even 2 million can be covered by what Walmart makes. How many multi-billion dollar companies do you think there are?

Attached: ee675b7f8a67211de2c49b243ca72f9826a026e01f0945dcef4a395fef0339b7.jpg (235x215, 10.29K)

The US yearly GDP is 19 trillion. If we divide that up amongst the entire world, that gives everyone $2.7k for an entire year.

For a *year*. Fucking dishwashers make 10x that in a year.

...

Yes really, take whatever average wealth statistic and you'll see how much majority of people would gain if they shared equally everything.

And you too, cuck. You think if you suck his dick he will marry you?. Have you chosen the wedding dress yet?.

The wealth of the richest 8 people in the world is equal to the bottom 4 billion on this planet

Boy you stupid manipulative bitch you.

Actually, you know what? No. Do you really, genuinely think socialism is just about taking back porky's profits?
Read literally anything with regards to economics or politics, it'll be an improvement.

Well gee, what if we employed everyone able to work in meaningful, productive labor? I wonder what would happen to their standards of living!

Attached: 72caa0ccdd07efd58bb350ddac128efaf16cdf9d.png (2544x2000, 1.49M)

Attached: f82aa7b8e5a922e76f6d71dd39b4d161515e29f64d9df4e9ef3ba02bbaea9dbd.jpg (528x800, 99.04K)

if you take those 8 people's wealth and give it to the 4 billion poorest there will be 4,000,000,008 poor people in the world.

how many times we gotta say it
WE
ARE
NOT
REDISTRIBUTIONISTS

Attached: to the gulag.jpg (973x1200, 86.96K)

Poor/wealthy doesnt exist when everyone have the same.

THIS ONLY PROVES SUCCSE ARE EITHER PUSSIES OR THEORYLESS FOOLS
T-2

Attached: 8bc3bab2ba3c57077b2d4882022421f4f99336957d2757d60b1caec60543fa45.png (480x456, 380.71K)

Well that's a shame. If only it was possible to use that money to give those four billion people the means to be self sufficient, the means of producing what they live… the means of production.

Attached: 8a41a08531420943e05782b33272fcbe4ceab0070f2136474fb44fcc9ba73445.png (350x470, 176.23K)

Everyone's poor if there's no food, regardless of how many pieces of paper with $ on them they have.

Wrong that mean the will be 4 billion people that just double their financial situation

Because without those 8 people no one in the world would ever make food

kys. Socialists want to redistribute means of production NOT money. But even if walmart did that, wallmart made profit 9.86B dollars last year. That would be extra almost 4700 dollars per employee per year, or almost 390 dollars per month. That is pretty nice sum of money, and you can add those CEO salaries and manager salaries to further increase it.

Attached: najstarsia-gorila-zomrela-676x483.jpg (676x483, 98.45K)

EVER HEARD OF FUCKING MARX?
READ NIGGER
T-1

Attached: 34d4c9ed1230cafce210553e058dc2369779ecd53d597c9e7472c67a9beccd09.jpeg (600x800, 86.14K)

what system?

...

Holy shit succdem, you're starting to get it. I can see the gears turning in that little peabrain of yours.

CAPITALISM

RAGING ☭TANKIE☭ MODE ENGAGED
THE SAME FUCKING SYSTEM THAT HAS BEEN BUTTFUCKING MOTHER NATURE IN THE ASS FOR 90 YEARS
THE SAME ONE THAT'S BEEN BLEEDING US ALL DRY
THE SAME FUCKING SYSTEM THAT'S BROUGHT SUCH SUFFERING AND WON'T STOP TILL WE"RE ALL DEAD
CAPITALISM FOOL

Attached: STFUL.jpg (600x800, 353.01K)

Stalin shouldn't have stopped in Germany. If he hadn't we wouldn't have to deal with this bullshit.

Attached: 1526760415790.jpg (1587x1557, 240.55K)

STALIN DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH

Even hunter-gatherer societies had/have food. And also treated shelter as a necessity since no hunter-gatherer society would ever allow private land holdings and the ownership of a bunch of shit you don't use.

Now, think about what modern, industrial production would be like if all of the wealth was in the hands of laborers and ownership of was determined practically. You co-own the factory you work in, own the profit your labor produces, and you own your own house because there's nobody to buy the block and keep the prices high. And unlike a hunter/gatherer society, there are methods to increase the amount of necessities available.

But note this isn't the same thing as moving some fucking money around.

There were never billions of people in one hunter-gatherer tribe, dumbass. And even then a lot of them died from hunger and disease.

way to ignore the rest of the post you illiterate dipshit

Just one question

Should the guy supervising all the workers get the same percentage of a copmpany's ownership as the janitor?

There's more than enough food to feed the entire world; foodfirst.org/publication/world-hunger-ten-myths/
We're going to seize the means of production, farms are an example of food production. Also your succdem policies won't work because the first world's wealth is caused by exploiting the third world; scarcity isn't the problem, the indigenous workers of the third world can't reasonably afford to buy the food they produce for us under capitalism enough to live healthy, if at all, considering the rates of starvation.
Why don't YOU look at Africa, Asia, and Latin America?

Attached: adorno_how_bad_things_are.jpg (1242x1119, 563.21K)

For fuck's sakes, friendo, the workers OWN the factory. Nobody "watches" over them, they democratically make the decisions of the factory.

no he should get less, preferably none at all

GO FUCKING HUNT ON YER OWN NATURE BOY

AAAHH NO YOU DON'T FUCKING GET IT YOU FUCKING ROOOOOSE

Attached: aXm7420xjU.jpg (650x650, 57.5K)

Please explain how one would feasibly ship, process, and distribute food to all starving people.

Have any of you actually held jobs before?

People are not a hivemind, there needs to be somebody who has to know what's happening at all parts of production and make decisions when issues arise.

Unless you believe the people at the assembly line, the people at shipping, IT, etc. will all come together in a kumbaya circle every hour and reach a mutually agreed-upon solution for things like when there's a problem with the machinery, that the delivery truck is behind schedule, when some guy keeps showing up to work late, etc it's not gonna fucking work without central organizers.

people can organize without a ceo "directing" things around

managers =/= leaders, of course certain people will natural arise in any democratic setting as a leader for various reasons, but the point of a worker run factory, is that the leader is himself one of the workers, not some overlord who does zero work yet claims to deserve a bigger pay check then those actually making the value for the company. Look at it this way, if all the managers of McDonald didn't show up one day, would every store close down and every worker go home because they don't know what to do? Or would they know from actually having done the task before and continue doing it for their paycheck, dealing with any problems as they come. Now what would happen if none of the workers would show up and only the managers?

Ok so that's a "no" to my question.

If the group-appointed "leader" is working in the mail room the whole time there's no way he's gonna be able to coordinate between all arms of production.

He coordinates for the factory he works in, and communicates with the other factories if they have worker representatives as well. Is this too hard to understand? One person does not coordiante for every single factory in the province.