Damn spooks

great grassroots idea!
t. Karl Rove

Attached: dalai-lama.jpg (1400x919, 110.08K)

No, I mean it. "Religious people r retards, lol!" is empirically incorrect.

According to Marx, correctness itself is equivalent to practice. Seeing that several global religions exist pretty stable, an almost everywhere, they are, therefore, correct, and dismissing them is vulgar idealism.

Are you a Jew? Useful goys assemble!

rmyt

There's room to talk about the usefulness of religion but that doesn't dismiss the fact that religions require dogshit reasoning to believe in.

But Yahweh chose the Abrahams to rule over all the goyim. Facts.

I've no idea what you're trying to express with this.

I'm saying some people were chosen and some weren't. Deal with it.

Mate, come one now. I know they say the left can't meme, but it's clear you just don't get it.

Religious people are usually lovely, in my experience. Don't let popular media exaggeration distort your perception.

Religious people, by definition, have something wrong with their reasoning.

Attached: 8dd3af5084faddb06dfece0269efd48278d144c3df074addf34ecb4a46717641.png (212x238, 4.52K)

Not really. Religion is fine. It doesn't matter. Makes no difference if someone is kind to you for the wrong reason or not.

To be religious you have to exist in a constant state of cognitive dissonance, that's not a good thing.

No because it's based upon something material and based in reality, unlike religion. Fucking read stirner before shitposting him retard.

Race is material. Its literally in your genes, skin and eyes. Doesn't get more real than that.

Wut? I thought we were talking about religion. Are you talking about people who made a religion out of their racism?

Not that guy but you guys will claim class is real while claiming race is a spook.

You mean like a God ordained caste system?

I don't think anyone here would claim that class isn't a social construct.

It's fine. Many people enjoy it. Does it bother you for some reason?

...

Lol give me a break

This is why you shouldnt take any word of a philosopher/etc as gospel.

Its fine for them to do what they do. They just need to learn to fuck off when people tell them to, and capitulate to superior ideals such as secularism and bake that damn cake.

Why are Atheists so violent?

What violence? I meant understand that your beleifs hold no water and should keep it to yourself.

FUGG OFF OBBRESSOR

I WON'T BE A PART OF THE GAY AGENDA

Attached: thegayagenda.png (957x711, 216.52K)

Just imagine someone refusing you service over some stupid shit they beleive in, how people getting into semantical gish gallop arguments over whos at fault here. If it was the other way around there would be hell to pay.

I would prefer a world of faggots than a world of gullible dogmatic ignorants

I care less about christcoms than I do about borg moralist.
As long as they don't plan on setting up a theocracy, I can't be bothered to care.

Attached: christ chan the ego and his own by max stirner.png (1000x1237, 870.67K)

Genetics are real there's no denying that, but the classification of "white" is a spook that changes over time to suit the needs of petty ethnonationalist retards. Hitler, for example, didn't consider french people, or slavs, to be "white", but lo and behold, now we're in [CURRENT YEAR] and the nazifags are pandering to them: "-haha ha…uh, Hitler was just kidding about that stuff…you guys are totally white, now! Uh, anyway, we need your help to defeat the muslim menace!!!!…and if you say no, we're kicking you off our white classification and you'll be hung on muh roep day." No wonder nobody wants to join those fags. Anyway, it matters little, there's no scientific evidence to suggest homogenous groups of humans have ever existed, and considering white skin is just a mutation (black skin is the "default" skin color, in other words, you can deruive white from black, but you can never derive black from white." The science is really interesting; sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

When Zig Forumsyps whine about race what they mean is a sort of biological essentialism (which is a spook); they take stereotypes to be reality, "blacks are inherently drawn to crime because muh genetics", "asians are inherently good at math cuz muh genetics", all ridiculous bullshit. The extent of any sort of "racial realism" is this: Blacks are slightly more resistent to sunburn than white people are (Darker skin protects against UV radiation), but they also have slightly more difficulty in absorbing vitamin D (absorbed from sunlight) in their bodies because of it. That's all there is to it.
livestrong.com/article/311881-dark-skin-color-vitamin-d/

Oh and uh, the "slanty eyes" asiands have in no way affects their peripheral vision.

Attached: race theorists.jpg (690x960, 130.72K)

Genes are material. Race is not. Race is merely an arbitrary grouping of some genes into a category like "white" or "black". We could just as easily separate people based on the curliness of their hair into "curly-haired people" and "non-curly haired people"

Can some gay person refuse service to some Cis person for my personal enjoyment plz.

Attached: SS2869752.jpg (172x192, 9.36K)

Obviously curly-haired people is the supperior race and anybody who disagree doesn't accept Science , FACTS, and LOGIC.

mfw

mfw

mfw

mfw

Attached: images.jpg (201x251, 8.82K)

...

Well it kinda has to be right? Religion doesnt look to kindly upon difgerent sexual orientations.

Not the catholic church

the pope said he supports the gays and other LGBQ people and welcomes them to the church and says though he does not feel he can support the trans community much he vowed to never abandon them and had trans people over at the vatican lately using the right pronouns n shit

No. Also you can treat fags like humans and want them to come to church and repent eventually, and also be against their sins and against gay marriage, against LGBTQQZ nonsense.

"In a letter the Archbishop of Melbourne Denis Hart said “the decision by Pope Francis to dismiss Fr Reynolds from the clerical state and to declare his automatic excommunication has been made because of his public teaching on the ordination of women contrary to the teaching of the Church and his public celebration of the Eucharist when he did not hold faculties to act publicly as a priest.”

Fr Reynolds told the US National Catholic Reporter (NCR) website he believed the excommunication also resulted from his support for the gay community. He told NCR that in the last two years, he has attended rallies in Melbourne advocating same-sex marriage and has officiated at mass weddings of gay couples on the steps of Parliament, “all unofficial of course.”"

irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/australian-priest-first-to-be-excommunicated-by-pope-francis-1.1541165

Australian priest first to be excommunicated by Pope Francis

Attached: ghheyy.jpg (248x255, 22.78K)

Religion is shitty, authoritarian, spooked and slows progress, and this is not only me saying it, this is centuries of theorist starting from Spinoza going through Marx&Feuerbach and following with all the lefty-psychanalitics gang.

The fact that something (hating religion) seems trivial and we all did it as 13-year-olds does not mean that it is necessarily wrong.
People attacking OP are too high on dialectics and Zig Forums sectarianism to accept this simple fact.

progress towards what? Without metaphysics your progress will be aimed at the dirt, at money and at sex, and actually be regressive.

it means we should have more nuanced opinions as we age, instead of talking about religion exactly the same way we did when we were 13 year old fedoras who discovered Dawkins et al.

OP has no content, even for Zig Forums this is an embarrassing thread.

Attached: DOBF0dCV4AAbts4.jpg (1748x1200 64.86 KB, 788.99K)

Anyway christanity is so spread and changed that has become cancer for retarded ideas to blossom
I have no problem if you pray to odin,the jewish gayboy, the cthulu or whatever
But people that bring the imaginery shit in to politics(liberal atheist,cristcoms etc..)are retarded and have no right to speak

if your politics isn't grounded in timeless and immaterial truths then your opinions will change with the wind and be essentially baseless, irrelevant noise.

You are so right
It's time to convert those catholic serbs over to being orthodox again

Hahaha nope
I am a marxist cause i understand its superiority over other ideas not cause of retarded spooks and moralism

Attached: FB_IMG_1504046199943.jpg (480x480, 20.91K)

JOIN TO GNOSTIC COMMUNIST GANG
AND LIBERATE THEOLOGY FOR PEOPLE

GNOSTCOM GANG!

historically or ideally?

Well both tbh
Historically i understand the problems of socialist states but i would prefer living in DDR or Cuba than capitalism.
Ideally i am not that dogmatic marxist . But is easy to accept what maked people to support the left .
Fun fact:i was once an ancap for personal ideas that i dont think u care to hear

Attached: communist_byzantine_flag_by_k_haderach-d7bk12k.png (1264x632, 83.39K)

I care.
tell me so I can make fun of you.

Attached: Comrade.jpg (397x355, 86.96K)

"16 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”
17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”
18 “Which ones?” he inquired.
Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19 honor your father and mother,’[c] and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”
20 “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”
21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
22 When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.
23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”"
Matthew 19:16-23

"31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”"
Matthew 25:31-46

"1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”"
John 8:1-11
I would honestly like to see conservative Christians meet their God.

Attached: why don't you turn to stone.png (500x919, 311.1K)

Well when i was in my 15-16s i hated stupid people(and still do) and my father was a libertarian to ,also i consider myself one of the greatest minds of the world so i was like "To fight stupid retards just let them die and capitalism will create a perfect world where artist will be free and other bioshock shit"

I left ancapism cause:
1)Ancaps are police,america,nazi-loving retards(i knew some of them in real life and all of them were weird in their own unique way)
2)The only ideology that cam secure equal opportunity is socialism so i became a soc-dem( a fanatical death squad joining soc-dem)

I wish you had died at the age of 3 of polio too, user. Let's commiserate together.

Religion is more undilectical than Fedoras.

monolithic religion is incompatible with any kind of genuine leftist government or organisation

Because religion holds back progress.

If it’s because there cis, no

Over a quarter of Americans are atheists. Also don’t forget the role religion had in McCarthyism.

Attached: ThereIsNoProofOfReligion.jpg (564x480, 164.58K)

Where are the proofs?

This doesn’t change the fact that
A) Religion is an anti-progressive reactionary forces 99.99999999% of the time
B) Religion is an unsustancied claim with no proof
C) Religious groups actively hold back scientific progress (see stem cell fiasco)

Timeless and immaterial truths don’t exist. The world is constantly changing, constantly dynamic, nothing, except the basic laws of physics is constant. Also all truths must be material, because in order for something to be true it must be able to be proven. And immaterial things can’t be proven.

Holy shit is that actually what Cosmopolitan used to be like? Now I'm sad.

Attached: .png (745x814, 147.15K)

this tbh

CAN'T STOP WON'T STOP

Attached: CW-Logo-lg.jpg (687x472 30.15 KB, 31.93K)