This board has come to the conclusion that Anarcho-communism/Libertarian socialism/Anarchism is what humanity should...

This board has come to the conclusion that Anarcho-communism/Libertarian socialism/Anarchism is what humanity should strive towards. I know there's a couple china supporting ☭TANKIE☭s and cockshott folks but the latter must be anti-state right?

Attached: 1528449574404.jpg (1573x1098, 936.97K)

Please go ahead and define state

Go to sleep comrade, maybe a stateless and not totalitarian society can work in your dreams

"Should" is a remarkably easy thing to say, and a myopic focus on this point is the only reason why anybody becomes a libertarian.

Why things got to be the way they are, and how we transcend current conditions are better questions to ask. Libsocs don't have good answers to that.

Sorry senpai but I've found myself drifting from libsoc type shit towards more traditional Marxism lately. I still intend to be overall anti-sectarian as I have previously been though.

Attached: 5875.png (689x775, 30.22K)

How can you support the state and be a Marxist they're mutually exclusive.

It's using the state as the arm of the proletariat until parts of it can be gradually dismantled as I understand it

Cockshott's view of states and socialism is very nuanced. A socialist country with a strong state is still socialist. But the basis of long-term socialism requires the elimination of bureaucracies, classes of elected leaders, etc. Cockshott doesn't even want a majority-vote democracy. He wants people elected to positions based on lot rather than votes, since voting will tend to favor those with greater resources and influence, thus shifting the entire system towards the "upper class."

And you think the bureaucrat class that will be created will just give up the rains that easily? Hitler did the same exact thing, when they signed the law that gave him his powers. It was only going to be temporary.

Face it; ML-ism sucks hot donkey shit.

Attached: alunya s,mug.jpg (390x500, 35.93K)

Except the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat isn't exclusive to Marxism-Leninism. Bit rich coming from an anarchist, too. Pic related is a list of all the lasting anarchist projects I could find.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (300x246, 5.1K)

What the fuck makes you think that people will want a dictatorship?

DOTP isn't a literal dictatorship, you dumb shit.

Hitler was a fascist, what the fuck does this thread have to do with him?

Uh no, this board has less anarchists now.

Pic related is all the lasting ML-states I could find

Attached: 513e639b5824800e92faea6d9bf6b18ba0c029775285fff005a39cce270c1df1.png (255x209, 925)

This is why we need aggravation of class struggle during socialism. Read about the Cultural Revolution that occurred in Mao's China.

Attached: Mao_Zedong.jpg (242x350, 22.21K)

Cuba and North Korea are ML.

China, Vietnam, Laos are still under ML leadership.

Yeah honestly Cockshott's view of 'the state' is basically what a lot of anarchists, including myself, advocate for and are trying to build.

I guess just change 'all the lasting ML-states' to 'all ML-states that aren't shite

So this is what they call "undialectical"

Ancom can only work pragmatically if we can develop an automated burraucratic system in lieu of an actual state to handle the logistics of trade and resource spending. Hypothetically speaking, if ancom were to happen in the US, it would be impossible to unify standards across the different time zones without such a system in place with just the sheer size of the country.

There are many instances of real world anarchism. Socialism only has the first five seconds of the Bolshevik revolution. Also really? Using the state for revolution? Even a fucking child would know that could only lead to a liberal hellscape or any one of the "fantastic" "communist" nations that exist today. MLs are some of the most brain damaged people on this planet if you even read your own text you'd know Marx envisioned communism as WITHOUT GOVERNMENT. Communism, anarcho communism, libertarian socialism, and socialism are all the same thing. Yet you reject your own ideology due to your fucking illiteracy, in favor of some ☭TANKIE☭ utopia. THE STATE CANNONT BE A LASTING TOOL FOR REVOLUTION. EVERY AND ANY REVOLUTION USING THE STATE WILL END IN OPPRESSION. Czar Nicholas thought he was such a capable and smart leader and clearly the best option and Lenin though that even more so because "muh Marx" yet MLism went to shit and was corrupted as fuck.
Cubans hate Cuba. They hate how imprisoned they feel. They rather go to America just for the chance of not being a complete slave than live in that complete dictatorship. For all of you that think Cuba is so great go to prison. Sure you have food and people and healthcare, BUT YOU ARENT FREE. I'm sick of this ☭TANKIE☭ streak leftypol is on.

Attached: 21vcqrmut0311.jpg (800x1553, 161.12K)

No they're not you fucking retard, read Marx.

Speak for yourself, faggot

post-left anarchism / postmodern anarchism / individualist anarchist /anprim are superior prove me wrong

A hippie commune that sells drugs and is occupied by biker gangs. t. Dane. Half of your examples don't exist anymore (and the Paris Commune can hardly be said to be an anarchist achievement, though you guys love to take credit for movements you were never part of), the other half are insignificant, and the last one is only "anarchist" by virtue of not even having agriculture. Go be a brainlet over on Reddit, don't pollute the board with your bullshit.

Go to China ML where you wouldn't have been able to even make that dumbass post. Thank god your praxis is so bad it won't ever hurt real people.

Did I hurt your feefees? Just admit that you're a brainlet kid clinging onto an ideology that is fundamentally incapable of ever accomplishing anything. It's never too late to educate yourself.

Attached: 4640a08177e7916604665dd4311e9e7ce369c8c8.jpg (454x500, 65.38K)

a fucking meme like said

r*java isnt anarchist

Anarchism is dumb in general except maybe ancom so if you're gonna spout that shit might as well go full retard and be anprim / annihilist.

Do you miss a few braincells?

Do you know what dictatorship means? It means one group of people dictates to another group. Dictatorship of the proletariat is the proletariat having the power and the bourgoiesie not having it. It is not a one man-dictator.

Marxism differs from the petty-bourgeois, opportunist “Social-Democratism” of Plekhanov, Kautsky and Co. in that it recognises that what is required during these two periods is nota state of the usual parliamentary bourgeois republican type, but a state of the Paris Commune type.
The main distinctions between a state of the latter type and the old state are as follows. It is quite easy (as history proves) to revert from a parliamentary bourgeois republic to a monarchy, for all the machinery of oppression—the army, the police, and the bureaucracy—is left intact. The Commune and the Soviet smashthat machinery and do away with it. The parliamentary bourgeois republic hampers and stifles the independent political life of the massestheir direct participation in the democraticorganisation of the life of the state from the bottom up. The opposite is the case with the Soviets.
The latter reproduce the type of state which was being evolved by the Paris Commune and which Marx described as “the political form at last discovered under which to work out the economic emancipation of labour”.

Read a book anarkiddy>>2549478

Attached: 41ebf36dee1b62b11578e2d32c3a9ad7e84f00e5d10bb3e2497ddbfca3d5c494.png (540x696, 354.91K)

Have you ever actually been to Christiania? It's a glorified tourist trap where people go to buy their weed. Upholding it as some shining beacon of socialism is fucking retarded.