Normie here. I was watching Jordan Peterson videos on youtube, and say this board mentioned in comments

*snap*

what threat do transgenders and feminists even present?

we stand with comrade obama in his struggle against hwite pipl

The destruction of western civilisation.

Simple, to destory the west so we can let the Russians and muslamics invade us and all become their cucks. It'll be great, I swear.

youtube.com/watch?v=EjlM3N0EKrc

what is western civilization to you?

dunno op, maybe you should actually read the writings of those evil cultural bolshe- eh i mean marxists for yourself to discover their evil plans and their motivations. We will probably end up deceiving you, we can't help it

Capitalism, individualism, Christianity.

Holy shit you idiots can't you recognize an obvious bait thread? just sage this thread goddamnit.

What, he asked so i thought we might tell him of out plans to i troduced forced femdommery.

Capitalism puts the rich in power. Why shouldn't we kill the rich and take their power?

Anything you like

rightysoys are always the biggest cucks.

But the capitalism is the most efficient system.

They don't support rape gangs. The rest is just contingent on them being part of our current culture, where women's and trans rights have become widely accepted.

Honestly, it differs from post-modernist cultural marxist to post-modernist cultural marxist. Me? I just want to destroy the west so my jewish puppet-masters can kill 200 quadrillion of my fellow white people

Attached: 21b83045dadc177ff983102e1136148fe4f852fc172e39320507c65996daa88e.jpg (1168x2816, 726.8K)

Why were they refusing to investigate them, and later put Tommy Robinson in prison?

Attached: GroomingGangsUK-NazShahMP-Tweet.jpg (266x320, 23.5K)

This is because socialists like Corbyn and Soros push cultural marxism propaganda everywhere.

Attached: 9e5f277f9374f830ffa8cd0bb327305a.jpg (600x400, 73.58K)

Peterson is not someone you should listen to. He makes a lot of good points but he teaches a false gospel.

Tory are cultural marxist too, they just support left-wing capitalism or something.

So socialist he funded the destruction of socialism in Eastern Europe, which is no doubt part of a deeper cultural marxist plot to pretend to collapse the soviet union to deviously put people off their guard.

Solid analysis.

Always relevant. Righties gonna righty

Attached: e21.jpg (680x823, 140.04K)

If Soros is not socialist why is he trying to get rid of all white people then?

The tories are communists, they arrested Tommmy Robinson!

Attached: Screenshot_20180525-193529~2.jpg (1250x806, 125.12K)

I doubt you're even white. Why are you so concerned about what happens to white people, mutt?

"The Labour Party owes more to Methodism than to Marx"
Quote occasionally attributed to Harold Wilson

Marx was from Germany and a lot of his ideas come from the Enlightenment. Even then why would destroying "The West" be "good" or what about it is worth saving? Why is, I would suppose "The East", "Evil"? Does this concept of "The West" also mean whites? Since a lot of Zig Forumsyps believe that nobody learns culture you're born with it? Why can't you play a Harpsichord right now?

I mean they're both wrong, it owes most to the labour movement itself, which was founded neither in marxism or methodism.

Because you will believe literally everything you read online.

Destroying the west is the only way to save western proles and also the entire world.

I don't remember Marx going on about killing white people for a thousand pages. But if white people need the polar ice caps to melt and the oceans to turn into acid because it isn't profitable enough to utilize existing technology to prevent (or significantly slow) those things from happening, then they could die. Because you are fucking dense of course nobody needs the Earth to die, you think anti-capitalism means deeply triggering and problematic like a good bootlicker

Have you considered that "getting rid of all wyat people" is not in fact socialism?
Activate your almonds comrade.

t-(you)
clearly a b8 thread, but I'm bored

why are you autists responding to this shit. Like, Jesus Chirst this is the weakest bait I've seen this year. Trust me, I hate rightoids as much as you all, but fucking hell not even they are this fucking moronic.

top kek

Marx was a jew, come on.

Why are all socialists are against white people then?

Attached: labourposter.png (1260x847, 1.83M)

Unless socialism is when every statement is true, this will in fact be the case most of the time.
Jog that noggin.

lmao obvious shop

twitter.com/hackneyabbott/status/589890643264167937

user I know its a bait thread

actually the original is kind of cool

Attached: C9ymI7FXcAAhTpM.jpg large.jpg (787x1061, 269.69K)

twitter.com/LondonLabour/status/1005401805017223168

Man you can obviously tell this was shopped. And a poor one too.

I refer to all the other (You)'s you no doubt intentionally harvested.

Haha nice spooks, nerd.

Haha no.

Give me proof Soros is trying to destroy white people.

Attached: productivity_vs_wages.png (500x493 78.81 KB, 119.27K)

THIS IS WHAT CULTURAL MARXISM LOOKS LIKE

Attached: Disco Internationale.mp4 (640x360, 11.78M)

Your first and last pic are good, but the middle one makes a poor argument because in socialism/communism, intellectual competition will still exist (which is why the incentive argument is bunk). People will have different ideas about which direction technology should go in, even if vain cancer like Apple products is off the table.

I'm glad this exists.

He is funding refugee shipment.

God this is fucking beutiful, how did I not already find this?

This is what socialistmuh not real socialism european union is doing. Cultural marxism really exists.

Attached: 1528742743845.png (656x367, 47.34K)

this is pretty pathetic at this point. Just stop

Yes, because private porn is full of aryans and has no race mixing or anything.

Germany is a capitalist country though. Private property did this.

Attached: alex drinking.jpg (540x960, 35.48K)

They have hight taxes.

Attached: SPD.jpg (600x617, 85.74K)

NED FLANDERS IS SOCDEM IS ACTUALLY EXISTING SOCIALISM

Attached: Taxes are good.mp4 (480x360, 448.22K)

FUCKING STOP THIS MADNESS

Attached: ancaps.png (500x334, 45.12K)

Attached: 1473171289779.png (600x380, 272.39K)

MUH TAXES

L A N D
OF THE
F R E E

Attached: american internet.png (500x365, 166.59K)

Where do I even begin? First off, no he isn't, he's donating money to refugees, he's not shoving them onto boats or the back of cars and forcing them into europe
uk.businessinsider.com/george-soros-hungary-refugees-consultation-2017-10

Second, Soros has a vested interest in these donations, they're not humanitarian; he's investing in future human capital that will go on to work, thus bringing in more employees who produce surplus value & pay taxes, and also draw loans from banks. Investing in people = people make you money = become rich(er)

Third, even if it was humanitarian and he was shoving refugees into europe, being pro-immigrant doesn't make you deeply triggering and problematic. This is a false dichotomy. That's like saying "You love dogs? You must hate cats! You're anti-cat. Pro-dog is a codeword for cat genocide."

Socialism isn't "high taxes" you brainlet.

Attached: Soros isn't a communist you dumb fuck.jpg (1222x843, 174.23K)

Just wanted to add that the only people forcing refugees to come to Europe are the European capitalists themselves. If they hadn't turned the middle east into a gigantic war zone none of this would be happening. In many respects Germany and the rest of Europe deserves to suffer.

not that trig wordfilter

Do you know that they aren't really europeans?

Hmmmmmm

Let me guess, jews?

socialism is when you have taxes, and the more taxes you have the more socalistic a society is

In what way does public art control the working class? I'm not quite sure I understand the poster.

Why are Americans so Goddamn stupid?

Attached: 1528682162169.jpg (967x615, 110.79K)

holy fucking shit this has to be fake.

Can someone refute this, sorry if this wrong place to post

Attached: yaron brook.webm (854x480, 13.17M)

The wireless chip, GPS, flat screen, voice recognition, and digital camera were all developed with either substantial federal backing or directly by the state. Besides, treating regulations as homogeneous is dumb. If you want to attack a specific regulation then by all means go ahead, but regulations span everything from child labor laws and limits on the length of the workday to bans on specific toothpaste ingredients.

what is there to refute about this?
Also, this guy is fucking annoying to listen to, how can anybody endure this

He's right that capitalism is a necessary stage of development, but free trade is shit for developing economies. First world nations built up their wealth with protectionism, the way for the third and second world to build wealth is protectionism. They need protectionism to grow into strong, healthy economies. Once the means of production are sufficient, socialism can and needs to happen. But free trade sucks wealth out of countries, their labor-power is made into commodities taken out of the country that are barely compensated for, thus making them poorer.
I agree that foreign aid in the form of monetary aid doesn't help, we need to help them build their means of production, their infrastructure, their human capital, and to help them just build their countries in general. The industrial revolution already happened, we can help our brothers and sisters in the third world rapidly industrialize and catch up with us, the technology already exists. There's no reason to have 19th century working conditions anywhere on this planet in the 21st century.

Wrong. The major industries are an oligopoly with no desire to innovate because of the lack of choice people have, "either buy our shit or don't have it". This isn't to say major companies never innovate, but they do so at a worse rate than others. Take internet service providers for example, America has shit internet compared to other countries;
recode.net/2017/12/13/16773062/global-internet-speeds-faster-2017-ookla
Countries such as Sweden, Netherlands, and Switzerland have tighter market regulations than America does, yet still produce better internet speeds. The mainstream liberal line of thinking is "get the regulations off our backs and encourage competiton and then they'll compete to give us the best internet for the lowest price!" Again, this doesn't happen. Example; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996 This deregulated the telecommunications industry so that "the little guy" could enter into the fold and live out his dream. But what happened? The major telecommunications companies agreed to split up their area of influence.
broadcastlawblog.com/2011/02/articles/on-the-15th-anniversary-of-the-telecommunications-act-of-1996-the-effect-on-broadcasters-is-still-debated/
So basically, "this is my turf over here, and that over there is your turf, don't step into MY area of influence, and we'll be fine." And because they're already massive corporations, they can outcompete "the little guy" who wants to start up his own telecommunications business.

It also gave everyone a shittier experience; tv.avclub.com/the-telecommunications-act-of-1996-gave-us-shitty-cell-1798250823

In other words, this fag is more free market apologist bullshit used to extract money from people dumb enough to show up to his seminars when they could've done their own research at home.

Attached: the free market is bullshit.jpg (1348x562, 541.28K)

This is so stupid. Does this idiot not realize that Mao himself is the one who modernized China? It wasn't capitalism that modernized China.

Also, South Korea only prospered because of big injections of foreign aid, first from the US, then Japan. It wasn't slowly racketing up within a capitalist system or whatever. It wasn't the "natural" capitalist growth that this guy seems to be implying. Also, I love how he brings up private property and capital at the end there. Shows what he really cares about.

I love how he completely ignores the fact that the Soviet Union modernized faster than any other society in world history, and living standards increased to a tremendous degree. Russia went from a backwards peasant society into a global superpower. Same with China, although it is succumbing to revisionism nowadays. I am not saying that the Soviet system was perfect. It wasn't and there were flaws. But saying that people were not lifted out of poverty is straight up delusional.

What a retard.

MEIN GOTT PURE IDEOLOGY

The bourgeoisie … lets him have the appearance of acting from a free choice, of making a contract with free, unconstrained consent, as a responsible agent who has attained his majority. Fine freedom, where the proletarian has no other choice than that of either accepting the conditions which the bourgeoisie offers him, or of starving, of freezing to death, of sleeping naked among the beasts of the forests!

Attached: 4K9iYVjvprIiNSE243wmPVf8_zgmOjfhOIW0ViFTqng.jpg (454x600, 56.89K)

Attached: an analysis of cultural marxism (2).png (931x503 149.74 KB, 135.41K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_on_the_Han_River
I know Wikipedia is not the best source, but I'm totally ignorant on this subject. However according to this link, it seems the speaker was correct, in that it was privately-owned, market-oriented economy that caused the success of South Korea's economy.

Yes, it was a capitalist economy, but there was a great deal more state direction than the speaker is willing to admit.
sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/skoreaplan.htm