I have read Lenin. His main gripe was that the proletariat didn't unite during WW1 like marx said they would and so they needed to be guided and educated into revolution. He thought a vanguard party would do it, I don't because we live under different materialist conditions in the 21st century first world. Nothing I've said contradicts Lenin, it branches off.
Anarchist-Leninism
Chase Harris
Isaac Martinez
You're a stupid faggot. The states degenerated because THE ENTIRE WORLD GOVERNMENT was against them! When will these retards get it through their heads. Can you even conceptualize the blood alone spent crushing Communism? How about the money? It could probably fill a sea and a thousand warehouses, at the very least. But, as blind as you are to this, you do manage to make the (don't mind if I say it) mind blowing assertion that the longer something is around, the more chances it will be changed, and thusly it could fail. Welcome to elementary school math class, today we will discuss probability.
You are a utopian piece of shit. Where will this discipline come from? Not any sort of hierarchy or state, so it will have to be spontaneous! I can't even believe I have to explain why this is ridiculous. You're like a child telling me your plans to revolutionize society. No, you are a child telling me your plans to revolutionize society. Your plan is absolute asspull;it's absolutely nothing but the product of a mind disconnected from reality. The proletariat of the world will spontaneously come together in bloodlust and fervor, linking hands through trade unions (why), and will morally and gloriously overthrow Capitalism.
I think your word choice of "craft Workers Battalions" perfectly illustrates your problem. You see the world in fantasy terms. Communism can be simply wrought into existence. I imagine this is where your critiques of past Socialist state's comes from. You don't know shit, about shit. Do you know the strugglet that was had just to collectivize agriculture in the Soviet Union? Exactly, it's unknowable, but you can read simply of deaths from famine to know that it wasn't easy. Surprise, surprise, revolution isn't easy. It's messy. Things fail. That's why your decentralized pile of shit decays away faster than a literal corpse, but a centralized revolution can actually weather a storm.
……. I'm completely done now. This is good.>>2552984
Jordan Peterson
Read a book and quit shopping at the ideological supermarket.
Lucas Cooper
Robert Robinson
OP is a dumbass but if, for some reason, you feel the need for "anarcho-leninism" then read Gaddafi. He was a staunch anti-imperialist but he also supported a system of local councils to the point that Libya was the closest thing to "pure" democracy in the world, for better or for worse.
Nolan Lee
William Baker
This is true.
Between the breakdown of capitalism and the construction of socialism/communism a great deal of things can go wrong. The USSR in particular had a small number of revolutionaries that were theoretically equipped to build socialism but the masses of working people were not ready. Lenin's idea was that you would overpower the bourgeois state then reorganize it on the basis of administrators who earned ordinary workers wages and were subject to recall if they proved unsuitable to the job.
The problem was that the ordinary working person in the Russian empire was illiterate. The culture of working people had not yet advanced enough for them to assume a leadership role in society which meant that such a role had to be taken by Communist Party intelligentsia, members of the former elite, "bourgeois specialists," etc. It was a necessary evil.
The good news is that even in many developing nations the cultural and educational level of the working people in infinitely greater than it was during the Russian and Chinese revolutions. In many places we can count on a working person to be capable of reading, writing, and performing basic arithmetic. We also have better lines of communication and most young people (again, even in developing countries) are familiar with electronic devices. This means problems can be solved far easier than they were in 1917 or 1920.
In a socialist revolution today there will be little need to rely on the state as a crutch when the working people themselves (however apathetic they might seem) have the basic skills needed to become self-organized.
Christian Roberts
Isaac Watson
GADAFFI WAS LEFTCOM GANG
Robert Rivera
I'm not against any kind of free love, homosexual or trans person, we just all have to make sacrifices.