Why don't you support Asset Taxes

Go away, liberal

Attached: george-bush-a-ok.jpg (247x227, 17.32K)

Have you ever read Karl Marx user? You have a quite interesting interpretation of socialism. He speaks about the oppression of the proletariat of the elite class. I'm talking about taking away the power of the elite's influence on the proletariat.

That's where you're wrong, good sir.

We don't have power to do anything of that. Unless you yourself happen to be in government somewhere, which I doubt.

The only tax I support is LVT and most of Zig Forums is predominantly concerned with the ownership of industry by workers via revolution.

No user, Santa told us that taxing them would simply be a band aid on a cancer patient because it's only trying to mitigate the effect instead of destroying the cause. Non-revolutionary Communists are an oxymoron as for Communism to happen you have to first have a political and economic revolution to secure the rights of the proles under the DOP and to strip the capitalists of their ill gotten gains. Now tell me why I should support merely taxing the billionaires instead of seizing their assets?

Socialism is not about taxes, moron. That said, the fact that the wealth of the owners and top corporate executives is mostly or entirely in the form of private and stock assets is a fact the liberal and socdems, that are the unfortunate face of the left as far as the public eye is capable of seeing, can't seem to comprehend.

I actually see elimination of personal income tax as an eventual policy goal the left should support.

why would a revolutionary communist tax billionaires when he could send them to the mega guillotine and just take the assets