We don't deny anyone the right to exist, why would we?
Depends on the situation, if the group is being ethnically cleansed(like the arabs in palestine for example) then we must attack the people doing the ethnic cleansing and support that group by every means possible.
No, i don't see how deliberately killing masses of people is not morally wrong.
In the case of Palestine we should support them against zionist by every means possible, if i had the power i would give every palestinian an AK-47 to fight off the zionists.
I don't get this question could you rephrase it?
Also just ignore the memers they're just retards
Andrew Ramirez
you know what, I'll bite. I believe cultural/architectural heritage should in some way be protected. It should also be obvious that we don't want genocide of any kind, and if a genocide would be imminent in a socialist country the government should do whatever it can to prevent it from happening. Other than that I don't know what kind of thing you have in mind as a way of "ensuring their existence". Moreover, what constitutes an ethnic group? If you are implying an ethnic group are people of one specific haplotype and as soon as "race mixing" happens it ceases to be the same ethnic group, please kill yourself. Also basically this; Individuals have a right to live their lives. In stating this right there's no need to group them together following arbitrary ethnic lines.
Chase Gonzalez
Ethnic groups ,i suppose yes …but not by force if someone wants to fuck ebony girls ..why stop him? Culture on the other hand are cute (and i believe they should be protected) but most leftist dont give a shit if you want to dress up and dance.
Joshua Moore
I see. So, in the example of the Selk'nam people, there is nothing wrong with the group becoming extinct per se, rather the issue is that the individuals that made up the group were murdered? The act of genocide is wrong, but the results of genocide aren't?
Let's say that they weren't hunted down and murdered, but were instead outbred by European colonists. Would that have been wrong? Should it have been prevented?
I believe that the alienation caused by modern Capitalism makes "keeping in touch with ethnic roots" next to impossible. And in the west, for example, birth rates for native Europeans are often below replacement levels. This wouldn't be a problem, except for the fact that non-indigenous ethnic groups have much higher birth rates. Do you think this justifies their eventual extinction?
Wyatt Gray
People have a right to continue existing, abstractions do not have rights.
What's funny is that /pol talks shit about survival of the fittest but we have to protect the hwite race because we're special snowflakes or something. It's even more hilarious because whitey is nowhere near going extinct. Then again a lot of libshits uncritically accept eugenics arguments and really believe that retards are a dire threat to their existence because retards smell or something.
Jordan Morris
It depends on the situation. There's a huge difference between actual genocide (systematically killing people of a certain population) and stormweenies' ridiculous "anuddah shoah" (autists can't get laid). Everyone has the right to reproduce with who they want, but no one was a right to force reproduction on someone else. If remote people like the Inuit die a slow death because their children move away and reproduce with non-Inuits then too bad for them, you can't force people to live in the middle of nowhere and marry their cousins for the sake of muh genetics.
What's with all the virgin-shaming lately? Are people supposed to derive their self-worth from their ability to extract sex from people? Please, keep your neoreactionary garbage contained to reddit memes.
Jaxson Carter
Yes, thats basically right. Genocide is not more immoral than completely random murder of an equal number of people unmotivated by ethnicity.
Given the above, no and no. It doesn't matter.
Ethan Evans
I'm sure that there are plenty of people with similar opinions to , e.g. that "groups" don't have rights, only individuals do. It's a valid position, just one that I disagree with.
That's a good example. What in particular is Israel doing that you would classify as ethnic cleansing? Is it the settlements? If so, would you say that China attempted to ethnically cleanse Tibet? If so, would you not agree that the mass migration into European countries is also ethnic cleansing, except one being perpetrated in the interested of global capital rather than a competing ethnic group? If not, what are the differences?
Let's use Wales as an example. If the Welsh people made up 90% of the population of Wales, would they be justified in enacting necessarily discriminatory policies in order to maintain or increase that percentage? What about if they were only 10% of the population? At what percentage does it become justified, if ever?
William Watson
I wasn't virgin shaming, it's the stormfags that put such a huge emphasis on reproduction and self worth while complaining about white women not wanting to fuck them. Zig Forums is filled with threads about trying to boost testosterone and bitching about black dudes stealing "their" women. If they don't want to be made fun of for being sexual failures then maybe they shouldn't advertise it as their main goal in life.
