Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite

what did he mean by this?

Attached: John_Kenneth_Galbraith_1982.jpg (220x296, 11.77K)

nothing too uncommon, just the usual mccarthyist rhetoric:

Not much. It just sounds clever. The only content is really that both the US and USSR were clearly exploitative, but in somewhat different ways. That's it.

He meant absolutely nothing. It's one of those corny ass bon mots that economists love because they have the social Autism Level of kids.

More horseshit theory nonsense.

Brainlets ITT
The quote is actually soviet political anecdote which satirizes soviet propaganda but useful idiots of course have to side with the government for some fucking reason.

Mutual benefit.

Attached: 02aa2faede27327b8390f83197c53a62.jpg (986x557, 41.89K)

Opposite of harming is helping.
Under communism, man helps man.

MISSION
COMPLETE

The opposite of man is woman. Thus he meant that men forcibly become feminized and made to take estrogen to eradicate all male influence, thus ending exploitation and reactionary tendencies. Under communism, woman aids woman. Super easy stuff.

Redpill on Keith Ballard

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (288x288, 90.28K)

Women dosent exploit women?

RADICAL FEMINISM

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (288x288, 90.28K)

L-look, they are as bad as we are!!!.

It reminds me all the capitalists saying that communism is authoritarian and exploitative, "and at least capitalists are honest about doing it", when commies pretend to be for everyone.

Question, how is communism less susceptible to corruption then, anything else?

u much prefer the old russian joke :7 years of capitalism did what 70 years of communism couldn't : make communism look good

that there is no explotation. Lmao

Well, if money is replaced by non-transferable labor tickets, corruption wouldn't really be possible? If you can't transfer them from person to person, if they are destroyed immediately upon use or purchase, where's the opportunity for corruption?

Nothing is incorruptible, but that does not mean this corruption should be embraced. Personality cults are a lesson the left has learned from, not a fact that we are trying to memory-hole.

It isn't, except for what pointed out. Tackling corruption is an additional issue next to overthrowing capitalism.

But when people live isolated lives being either actual peasants or divided into suburbs, how else are they supposed to have their politics embodied? What's the other option?

Has anybody made popular explanations, or theories of how a corruption free Communism would work? To me it seems, corruption would be the same if not worse depending on the government employs connection to production, and the transparency of government.

Attached: 41de38949c5a868510965295121b6f64743da924feed6bf88624d131ecf5f810.jpg (2291x2837, 5.3M)