there's a reason i simply said "rape"
they still cannot consent, it's the same thing to me
the effect is irrelevant for this, they can't say yes to something they have no comprehension of
and i wouldn't call a childs sexuality something they themself have a grasp of
You can't hide from the truth forever
Ryder Barnes
Kayden Perez
Note to summerfags: this thread is the human nature argument but applied to a particular thing. 'why dont you care about muh pedos? see? HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH THE SHEER NUMBERS? EMBRACE THIS IDENTITY HURR DURR'
Nicholas Nelson
Upset?
Mason Smith
No one cares if you're attracted to kids. There's nothing unethical about it. Have a good fap to some loli hentai.
But you can't go around fucking children. That's sick. They have no idea what's going on. You're an adult. They absolutely depend on you to have their best interests in mind. And then you want to go ahead and use them to fulfill your sexual needs? That's horrible. If that's you, you're a horrible human being, and you should probably go jump off a rooftop.
That being said, our society is pathologically afraid of pedophilia. I'm not sure if there's anything wrong with helping children explore their sexuality. But it can't come from a place of sexual desire, or even worse, some enjoyment of the position of power you have over them. That's where you gotta draw the line.
Ayden Adams
so that's why kids who get diddled mostly become heroin addicts
Asher Gomez
Non-harming, you say. It is not inherently-harming, yes, but what is the spirit of this practice? These children are not brought fully into the social world and they are as such not able to approximate the meanings of what's going on. Even those who know about sex don't necessarily understand the meaning of it. What you are asking for is a sort of asymmetric relationship where the asymmetry is based upon a very stark divide between the adult who knows more and registers it more and the child who doesn't. In order for your fantasy to work while overcoming this, adults must either be reduced to children or vice versa. If not, adults are going to be making use of children AS IF THEY ARE OBJECTS. It is a deeply bourgeois fantasy for that reason: people are objects to further some sort of cause for the bourgeois subject.
Say what you like about 'the facts' but your empiricism does not approximate what it practically means for us. When you are cornered there, you SQUIRM in the face of your fantasies being mauled before your eyes.