>be me
I think we all know what happens next
How can we possibly avoid this?
>be me
I think we all know what happens next
How can we possibly avoid this?
My great grand father developed Alzheimers towards the end of his life. He began to say a ton of absurd nonsense until he lost all sense of self. He never gained a devoted cult following, so I have my doubts about this scenario.
how would this lead to any of the consequent steps being taken?
Anyone who has read Smith would find Rand and Friedman laughable.
I believe all of those things and I'm a communist.
History has stages and capitalism is great.
People have bought into much more unbelievable things before. Especially after a long amount of time, believing things like this becomes much easier.
Eh, he's one of those people that can be misinterpreted very easily (dae invisible hand).
Obligatory.
Shoot them.
Or maybe just provide free ecenomics classes that dispell all that reactionary shit.
It's literally impossible to go back. You don't see people advocating feudalism these days simply because it's just not possible to implement.
I don't understand material conditions and the ideas attached to them: The Post
If communism has been around for a hundred years together with all which that entails anyone who would start getting into spouting ideas like that would sound to the people of tomorrow as is sounds like to someone within modern bourgeois parliamentary capitalism if someone starts talking about returning to absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings, and how we should just reinstitute serfdom and an agrarian economy.
It's just not going to happen, anyone spouting it will be regarded as a fringe loon and paranoiac. There simply is no material basis for the development of any coherent movement out of it. The last point in your example just won't happen and the idea that it would be even possible to roll back the wheel of history without some global cataclysm is absurd.
...
it would be of no more significance than the neoreactionaries/ultrareactionaries and all manner of traditionalist and monarchist kooks of today, blogposting about their favourite inbred royal bloodlines on the internet and opining about the superiority of yesterdays social order. Yes they exist but none of them are taken seriously and they have not even a scintilla of power and never will. Even the most retarded (in the quite literal sense) of them do not seriously advocate a return to the feudal economic order, such a thing cannot even be envisioned, so far from reality it is to our capitalist eyes within the liberal hegemony of today. No more will the people of tomorrow even consider for a moment taking the rights of common ownership from which all benefit and divvying up the commonwealth of all between a few dozen individuals, handing over the business of our lives and livelihood to their whims and interests, than the people of today would welcome the notion of becoming a serf tied to the land, at the whim of their liege. At most these ultrareactionaries of tomorrow will advocate a return the political system of today, of representative democracy, political parties and the like. This too will be at most mocked and receive no significant support or even notice at all with the libertarian individuals of communism any more than the advocates of absolutism and restorationism do today. So they will remain the sad little beings that they are in their basements fantasising about henry ford and steve jobs, some may even claim that the mass slaughter of workers in the Muskpocalypse of 2027 never happened and that if only his coup had succeeded the enlightened despotism of the captains of industry and the free market would have had us colonise other systems by now and set up several dyson spheres. They'll get together on obscure forums and post concept art of the hyperloop and jack off to how awesome it is and how the fucking commies stopped it happening. But that will be all.
Even if we were to assume communism didn't take the entire world in one go through revolution, we would look at the remaining parliamentary and otherwise representative democracies in much the same way we look at saudi arabia today. As archaic and inhumane, abusive systems of government to the abolition of which we all look fondly. And even there the economic base will have changed and socialist relations of production would dominate. No one will really want to restore the political systems of yesterday, the vast majority of people will recognise the current order as the highest and most advanced in human history which has bestowed on us nothing but prosperity and liberty for all.
Hmmm, where have I heard that type of talk before?
But it is possible to go back, all you need is for all the educated people to be killed off.
How did that work out for you last time brother number one?
Ask Pol Pot, it was his not TRUE socialist dream.
b-but sobiet union went bag to gabidalism :DDDD
How can you go back to capitalism if you never left it in the first place?
...
...
we don't need to, its completely undialectic
Uh huh. Keep dreaming, mate.
So you would just do nothing?
Lol'd
The Brazilian monarchist movement is literally more popular and has more legitimacy than any of the political parties.
Where's the massive popular movement to reinstate peasant economy and feudalism
A movement for capitalism with an autocrat is not a movement for a return to a political economy based on peasant labor and feudal lords
But did he make YouTube videos?
Just burn that shit, it was written by retards anyway so what good does it do?
we're not nazis
reactionary literature is still important to read as socalist
faggot
How to avoid this? by genetically altering humans so that they become naturally averse towards reactionary behaviour.
No, I would have a debate with whoever I disagree with, and if my country vote something I don't like, then I'd either suck it up and vote again next time or move out.
how would you make money on a capitalist enterprise, it's literally imposible in fullcommunism, here i'll do the thinking for you to realise why.
if you make an enterprise it has to sell goods at lower rates than the government to sell anything, but the goods of the goverment are priced at their labour time level, so you need to be more efficient than the government to make any profit, then you make the enterprise and nobody cares that you are selling, why?, because for the same work the government would have given you the average labour content your product has in all society, effectively paying you the government rate, which is higher than you price, so effectively any idea you had you would make more by taking it to the government