1.) Republicans are stoopid 2.) Some democrats seem conservative 3.) Liberals are economically conservative and socially liberal 4.) DemSocs have great ideas 5.) Marx is the most eloquent political writer of all time 6.) Liberals ARE conservative 7.) Stalin did nothing wrong 8.) Liberals are right wing 9.) We need violent Marxist revolution 11.) DemSocs are right wing and counter-revolutionary enemies of the people's movement 12.) Mao is the most eloquent political writer of all time 13.) Pol Pot did nothing wrong
I know this thread might be a bait, but I wonder, what good did Pol Pot do for you to consider him innocent. I don't even think this guy had any proper ideology, and he was basically responsible for the death of 1/4th of Cambodian population and regressing the country back into the middle ages.
Can you enlighten me OP and present to me his ideology and explanation for why depopulating cities and destroying the means of production was good in any way?
Juan Allen
my rational skeptic heroes start taking shots at muh dumb sjw feminazis:
I'll answer this, because I'm actually leaning towards Maoism and much more impressed with 3rd worldism as my understanding communism matures.
I used to poke fun at Jason Unruhe, and 3rd worldism on a daily basis. So I started off with reading Marxism first, and then moved on to reading about Leninism. Marx seems like a fantastic starting point. Then I began to read Mao. Mao is a significantly better writer than just about any socialist out there. He's easy to follow, cuts into subjects patiently and clearly. He's kind of like Sun Tzu for communists. I personally think he's perhaps the most articulate writer on developing a mindset for a working people's revolution. After this realization I decided to investigate 3rd worldists and their writing of the revolutionary experience. As it turns out, many of them encountered exactly the same kind of counter revolutionary problems, overcame the same hurdles and dealt with similar issues that American communists face. The most articulate essays on the modern revolutionary mindset come from 3rd worldists. As a revolutionary leader Pol Pot had no prior experience, did not set out to cause the death of thousands and contended with foreign saboteurs and hostile powers. He also experienced strong opposition from their version of boomers at the time, and tried to remedy that. One final note is that Pol Pot did not have complete control over all of the revolutionary elements in their movement, and many atrocities blame belong to uncontrolled counter revolutionaries as opposed to Pol Pot.
Sebastian Brown
...
Connor Phillips
we don't fucking care what you believed in when you were 13-17
Robert Perry
Nigger
Wyatt Morgan
I kind of care to see other anons political backstories, I've already posted mine extensively in multiple of these threads before so I don't wanna post mine though
