Questions for Real socialists tm

Can you explain to me why a comune isn't a form of government, then explain to me how a counsel of village elders voting on what's best for the village, isn't a comune? Also for all the non anarchists here, explain how your ideal socialist government won't be a big nanny state.

Attached: 36358755_748951498562267_8490133978836107264_n.jpg (720x523, 27.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1620190871547616&ref=content_filter
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Not him, but if you can't explain things in your own words, you don't actually know anything.

I fail to grasp what's wrong about that…but i was born and raised in a catholic society, and catholic societies are community oriented, group minded.
This capitalism, individual responsability and liberal democracy don't function here. it's against our nature and culture.

It will be a nanny state that will kill all the rich people and reactionary morons like you.

Why? No one seeks to 'abolish' government. You seem rather confused.

Only the essentials required to live a productive life are provided. You are not spoon fed luxury.

I talk to a lot of ancoms.

Not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about like how in the UK a potato peeler is an offensive weapon .

What's your point? Ancoms do not want to get rid of government either.

Kek, I guess I'm just not talking to True Ancoms then.

I mean i guess if you've been talking to people then everything is settled. No further questions needed.

m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1620190871547616&ref=content_filter

It is. But there is nothing wrong with having "government" if it's democratic enough
It is, I bet that people who you were talking to, or ancoms in general, are people from cities. I found out that this "problem" arouses mostly with americans, which can not even comprehend how small village of a few hundred people looks like.
What even is "nanny state"?

Attached: b4ea6119e4e143a7ad62ae0b18ed5e1d4dab87f2e9e7d1ed6c3942fa431cec36.png (158x143, 29.47K)

your point is..?

Attached: theresa.jpeg (590x350, 27.56K)

Modern society cannot be controlled by true democratic decision making. The world as it is now, has workplaces so big, sectors so interconnected, and technology so complex that no layman would be able to make qualified statements let alone decisions regarding how to lead such operations. You would need certain "elder councils" with the expertise to handle these subjects. This doesn't mean that the general populace wouldn't have the power to intervene if the results of these councils are unsatisfactory. Likewise, there are aspects which the regular worker within these structures could have influence. These would primarily be within how the workforce is handled, aka workplace safety and the structure of the workplace hierarchy, so that the people with defacto power will not abuse it. You might say that this requires an external force to hold in place these rights, however, all it would require is that the workers are guaranteed their daily necessities in case of a strike.

"Questions for real socialists" is a thread posted every time by a faggot that argues in bad faith and is mentally damaged. Don't waste your time.

The state =/= government.

A government is not a state.
The state is for a marxist an institution that is used by one class to suppress another.
For an anarchist it is an institution with the monopoly on violence.

Is actually generated by rather simple rules. Consider this admittedly stretched comparison: a plant is a very complex organism, most farmers do not fully understand that complexity, yet they can use it to grow crops just fine.

The rest of your post is just democracy isn't perfect enough.

Many historical socialists were pro-gun. The proletariat, as the revolutionary class, must win their place as the dominant class over the bourgeoisie in order to create a socialist society, and that entails taking up arms against the bourgeois state. That alone precludes any idea of "muh potato peelers".

What the fuck are you talking about?

Nanny states only exist because of capitalism to begin with.