Don't get me wrong. I understand the Idpol issue very well and I also think that class war has always the highest priority. Trans, gays, etc. are a marginal minority. But what is in the case of feminism? I mean, at least 50% of the whole population are women. How can this still be idpol? Or did I miss something?
Feminism and Idpol
Ayden Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
unz.com
youtube.com
phys.org
futurism.com
unz.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Adrian Parker
Feminism isn't needed in a Socialist society.
James Smith
If you understand the class struggle you should know about Marxism-Feminism comrade
Alexander Butler
Because it's a political philosophy centered around identity as a woman….
Aiden Torres
...
John Morris
It's called Marxism for a reason, not womanism
Alexander Harris
it does not make sense to adress any of personal experiences and struggles that are peculiar to someones identity outside of the context of class society.
let's just take transgenders, since it's even a "hot topic" by some autistic fucks on this board that have no understanding of what idpol really means.
what do we care for capitalist transgender persons "rights"? they are still exploiters, getting transgenders into the sphere of the capitalist class or more available as costumers to sell shit to has nothing to do with our cause.
this is liberalism.
would it on the other hand make sense to start ridiculing and attacking transgender folk to alienate them and their whole social circle of family and friends? it is odd to say the least that communists would waste their time on something petty like a miniscule identity group.
however it does make sense to explain the difference of classes to also a transgender person and the benefits of our free health care system but also, as a person in general, the better working conditions and extend of democracy also for them.
which also holds true for every other single big and small groups of identity. some of the shit you hear faggots talk about transgenders differs in nothing to what a retarded person might say about women in the movement. "they are too bourgeois, they just want to buy stuff and become part of the establishment".
well, no shit, this is the plan that liberals have for them and we have to counter it with a position on its own merits: a class based program.
it is not to simply join into the idpol faggotry in mere opposition to liberals like edgy autright teens.
Robert Phillips
forgot to explain the pic posted in the context, thinking it'd be self explaining with what i already wrote, but just to make it clear:
you could exchange "feminism" in what she said with other identity groups ideologies, as demonstrated by, let's say it more broadly, "LGBTQ".
now did Kollontai mean by this that women are incapable of becoming revolutionaries and that they as women are tools of the bourgeoise?
of course not, she herself is evidence of the opposite.
it is however "feminism", or any other ideology of that sort, that disconnects itself from class struggle, which itself already is all-encompassing in uniting all workers of all identities for the driving cause of mankind.
Bentley Rodriguez
Many thanks for your reply. This explains the issue very well.
Noah Howard
Zig Forums is a board if larpers from Zig Forums pretending to be leftists and inteligent. Don't take anything seriously.