Extinct Left-Wing Sects

Has anyone met a supporter of any of the following "extinct" Left-Wing ideologies. I know some of these ideologies have evolved and merged with modern ones today but some have unique characteristics.

Robespierrists: Specifically his theory about Virtue, Terror, Rousseau, and Republicanism. Including the Cult of the Supreme Being

Hébertists: Dechristianization and the Cult of Reason (Modern Fedoras can be seen as this)

Enragés: Maximum Edge in Far-Left form utilizing price controls and extremely strict punishments to destroy the rich.

Babouvism: The ideology of François-Noël Babeuf, considered "The First Revolutionary Communist"; it is practically proto-communism, it lacks much theory

Blanquism: Non-Marxist Socialists who believes that a coup of elite revolutionaries would establish socialism. inb4 Proto-Leninism

Am I missing some more?

Attached: Jacques Roux.gif (691x802, 263.7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

georgistjournal.org/2012/09/25/henry-georges-letter-at-the-funeral-of-karl-marx/
marxists.org/archive/dutt/articles/1935/question_of_fascism.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

All sectarian ideologies are inherently meme ideologies since I doubt you'll have a hard time finding anyone IRL and outside of places like/leftypol/ who seriously subscribe to such ideologies fully.
Another one you're missing is Soreleanism which is essentially ultraviolent syndicalism

Sylvain Marechal counts? Also I find it funny when people only remember Robespierre when the French Rev is mentioned. Of course he's essential but there were also Saint-Just, Desmoullins, Danton, Hebert, the enrages, etc.


And philofascism if not outright fascism

Marxism-Leninism and Maoism are pretty much extinct at this point. The only people calling themselves "MLs" or "Maoists" are edgy kids or groups like the Naxals which are probably going to lay down their arms within a few years.

Any school of leftist thought older than 40 years is de facto useless for the modern day. Even most anarcho-syndicalists are just Chomsky fanboys who contribute very little in terms of pragmatic action.

By that I mean, Bolivarianism, EuroCommunism, Democratic Confederalism, Autonomism, and even stuff like Fourth Political Theory, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics or Gaddafi's Green Book (which is just 4PT with North African features) *are*, in fact, new theories which incorporate issues relevant to today.

You may object by saying most of these ideologies "aren't socialist" when put into practice, but they point is, they *are* being put into practice because they're pragmatic for the time being. Post-revolutionary Russia didn't look like the Paris Commune but that doesn't mean it wasn't a DoP.

De Leonism.

Situationism. I mean, Debord and co. were a bunch of pretentious hipster fucks. Who on earth wants to bring back this shitty movement today?

Has anyone met an IRL Georgist? I'm pretty sure Sun Yat Sen carries more political clout globally than Henry George at this point.

Attached: 1d_Sun_Yat-sen-3.jpg (1500x1000, 488.95K)

Look for mutualist groups on FB and you'll find a few. Not even kidding.

What does Lincoln have to do with Taiwan?