A Thread for Deconstructing Right-Wing Rhetoric
That reminds me; do you really think that they honestly believe that the holocaust never took place? There is little doubt that a lot of them believe that the holocaust, as a concept, is a great thing, but perhaps holocaust denial really stems from the fact that the holocaust comes with a lot of baggage for a political movement and thus, denying the holocaust is simply what will win the argument, regardless of whether or not it is true.
the loss of WW2 is something the right will always be bitter about, so they'll scramble for any rickety logic that could lessen the blow.
Stupid white people. Everyone knows the internet is African technology and the founding fathers created the US to breed their own people out of existence.
Like you said, they wish it was true but believe it was not. It seems they are using evidence as the basis for their beliefs. Abhorrent.
the only "evidence" they have amounts to MUH JOOZ and unsourced infographs
Ironically, this is also a great demonstration of right-wing rhetorics; If you can't argue, bait and try to derail the discussion itself. It doesn't matter if it's dishonest, any technique is allowed when combatting the Great Other.
The classic "Communism killed (insert number of the week)" or "Its against human nature/only works on paper" and "Venezuela"
'Allo lads, are the Strawmen feisty today?
fraid so m8