Art & Aesthetic theory

I think he's severely overrated, to be fair. Most of his recent stuff is just flat, one-note china=bad statements.

youtube.com/watch?v=llacDdn5yIE

I don't get art at all. I see it and I feel nothing beyond "that's impressive" or "that looks neat."

i think that's how appreciating art works, just add some big words and you will be just like any art critic.

I'm not so sure. I'm at least able to articulate why all of the music I like is shit, and what would make it "good" in the sense that it would have some artistic value beyond being a product. I can't do the same for really any kind of visual art.

I mean, are you an artist yourself or read some art theory shit? if you are just an average joe then it's only normal you can only enjoy art without really understanding why, like most people.

I'm just a dumb autist who needs to be told how to do normal human things

all the world's a stage :^)

Not him, but I've talked to regular joes who have enjoyed my work. It's not unusual for them to get it, to some degree of depth. Then again, I can't stand being obscure for its own sake, or spouting jargon to make yourself seem smart.

i think it's neat. not sure if it has any revolutionary potential though.

I think it has a lot to do with being in the right state of mind, and lucking out in happening to see a piece of art that speaks to you right at that moment.
postan art I like Goya and Francis Bacon