Khrushchev did nothing wrong

Read his secret speech. I don't understand why everybody shits on him.
That boy is based af

Attached: 220px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-B0628-0015-035,_Nikita_S._Chruschtschow.jpg (220x295, 13.34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/marx/res/11391.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

based giant bald toddler

...

Khrushchev was kind of a dumbass though, and could have handled destalinisation a whole let better (the CPSU refused to acknowledge the original Secret Speech anyway, and pointed to another article which was objectively handled the issue way better). still, people who think that his secret speech was anything but him consolidating power and that he was actually some kind of anti-communist are also equally as dumb. it's a shame how many MLs seem to think Stalin was socialism, and that anyone who dares criticise him is immediately a revisionist. even Mao criticised Stalin privately, and only shat on Khrushchev because Chinese and Soviet ties were already shaky and Mao didn't trust them.

Anti-revisionism is autistic, dogmatic, and completely impractical. There's a reason why all the currently existing socialist states are revisionist, the Maoist guerillas are all either dead or turning revisionist already and the Hoxhaists ended up supporting imperialism in Ethopia and getting fucked in Albania. Leave your larping behind.

At least Stalin wasn't a revisionist.

Because he's a liar? Most of the shit in the secret speech is made up and has been parroted by anti-communists ever since then, like for example Stalin having a mental breakdown when Operation Barbarossa started.

Best Korea isn't revisionist

Attached: Joseph_Stalin_and_Nikita_Khrushchev_1930s.jpg (2212x2929, 569.73K)

They aren't dogmatists either

Attached: dogmatism bogus marxism kim il sung quote.jpg (1000x560, 64.32K)