Read my original post . Merely having state ownership alone is obviously not socialism, the state is just transformed into the capitalist
Elizabeth Warren is going to break up big tech companies
Luke Wilson
Anthony Morgan
Hasn't he raised millions already?
Daniel Young
having a capitalist state defeats the whole point, it means the bourgeois still exists in some degree
the real bourgeois are the ones with the power to do so
Anthony Ross
that's cute
Daniel Martin
How much did trumps cost?
Jose Ortiz
supposedly less but i'd say 1 billion is what you need to win.
The point is that the richest donors always win elections
Jackson Taylor
I honestly have no clue what we're arguing about at this point, I'm not advocating for capitalists
Kevin Ramirez
state capitalism with a socialist party will never be socialist
Xavier Gonzalez
That's traditionally been the case, yes. but we live in a timeline where what's traditionally the case is collapsing fast.
There are countless examples of trends and norms being bucked in the political/electoral sphere in current time. I think it's premature to discount him, for now at least.
Jack Cox
Learn basic economics, the simple principle of economy of scale teaches you a million times more than any bullshit about competition.
Not a thing.