Extirpating the Unfit: Socialism and Eugenics

The revolution does not end with the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Concurrently with and as part of the construction of socialism is the revolution within the realms of cultural and ideological realms for the building of the socialist man and woman. The transition to socialism does not remove all of the more unpleasant remnants of the past. As part of the (re)moulding of the society man and woman there will have to be steps taken in the biological realm as well – eugenics. What policies must be pursued?
With sterilization the individual has no consent over the procedure. It is mandatory by law. Those targeted by sterilization will be numerous. Here is a list of some potential groups to be sterilized by the DoTP: (1) schizophrenics; (2) hereditary blindness; (3) hereditary deafness; (3) Huntingtons's disease; (4) severe alcoholism; (5) severe hereditary deformities. In short, anyone with disorders of diseases that are capable of being passed on into another generation will be sterilized. This is without doubt an area where collective well-being trumps the rights of the individual.
Euthanasia will be split between mandatory and voluntary euthanasia depending on the nature of the situatiom. Involuntary euthanasia will be used against many of the deformed, autistic, paralyzed, etc. The reasons for this are several. For one, these people are socially superfluous and amount to a waste of resources. From a humane perspective they live a life unworthy of living. Again here parental (i.e. propertarian bourgeois) feelings towards children are of no concern. If I had a child with some horrible congenital problem I would only wish that they could be euthanized. It amounts to mercy killing. Watch the video below and tell me that this is life is "valuable": youtube.com/watch?v=j4PTf7LgsIE&t=2s
Voluntary euthanasia is an option with terminal and extreme painful illnesses. If one becomes braindead and have family, the life of the incapicitated individual falls under the discretion of the family. If I had a family member in such a situation I would have them killed and can only hope that my family would show me the same mercy.
Abortion will be legal. Abortion will mandatory in cases of rape, incest and any and all detected deformities or developmental disorders. Eugenics in action has born fruit in Iceland with the almost complete eridication of Down syndrome in Iceland. The time for dysgenic policies concerning pregnancy is over. I live in a Burger state where it is quite literally a felony to abort a baby if it is found to have Down syndrome or similar issues.
cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (237x378, 181.45K)

This is retarded and unnecessary.
Natural order is instated by socialism and people become more fit to live naturally, through dominant genes that just making looking more desirable and smart a more common occurance and everybody has at least one good thing about them.
Pictured is how dominant genes work

Attached: download.png (258x195, 5K)

To expand on my previous post op has downs and doesn't live in iceland, lmao

It is not unnecessary. Retards and the deformed will continue to exist under socialism and any mode of production. Not all people are inherently valuable and worth keeping around. It goes beyond feelings, it is the pragmatic and humane solution.

yeah okay, thanks liquid you twat

Attached: liquid snake recessive dominant genes.png (593x392, 42.01K)

Disabilities are recessive, but ok.

Very few compared to capitalism, where boojy bastards buy girls even though they look too like a frog.

Only one mutated copy of the gene will be necessary for a person to be affected by an autosomal dominant disorder. Each affected person usually has one affected parent.[8] The chance a child will inherit the mutated gene is 50%. Autosomal dominant conditions sometimes have reduced penetrance, which means although only one mutated copy is needed, not all individuals who inherit that mutation go on to develop the disease. Examples of this type of disorder are Huntington's disease,[9] neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, Marfan syndrome, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, hereditary multiple exostoses (a highly penetrant autosomal dominant disorder), Tuberous sclerosis, Von Willebrand disease, and acute intermittent porphyria. Birth defects are also called congenital anomalies.

X-linked dominant disorders are caused by mutations in genes on the X chromosome. Only a few disorders have this inheritance pattern, with a prime example being X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Males and females are both affected in these disorders, with males typically being more severely affected than females. Some X-linked dominant conditions, such as Rett syndrome, incontinentia pigmenti type 2, and Aicardi syndrome, are usually fatal in males either in utero or shortly after birth, and are therefore predominantly seen in females. Exceptions to this finding are extremely rare cases in which boys with Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) also inherit an X-linked dominant condition and exhibit symptoms more similar to those of a female in terms of disease severity. The chance of passing on an X-linked dominant disorder differs between men and women. The sons of a man with an X-linked dominant disorder will all be unaffected (since they receive their father's Y chromosome), and his daughters will all inherit the condition. A woman with an X-linked dominant disorder has a 50% chance of having an affected fetus with each pregnancy, although in cases such as incontinentia pigmenti, only female offspring are generally viable.

This type of inheritance, also known as maternal inheritance, applies to genes encoded by mitochondrial DNA. Because only egg cells contribute mitochondria to the developing embryo, only mothers can pass on mitochondrial DNA conditions to their children. An example of this type of disorder is Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy.

Genetic disorders may also be complex, multifactorial, or polygenic, meaning they are likely associated with the effects of multiple genes in combination with lifestyles and environmental factors. Multifactorial disorders include heart disease and diabetes. Although complex disorders often cluster in families, they do not have a clear-cut pattern of inheritance. This makes it difficult to determine a person’s risk of inheriting or passing on these disorders. Complex disorders are also difficult to study and treat, because the specific factors that cause most of these disorders have not yet been identified. Studies which aim to identify the cause of complex disorders can use several methodological approaches to determine genotype-phenotype associations. One method, the genotype-first approach, starts by identifying genetic variants within patients and then determining the associated clinical manifestations. This is opposed to the more traditional phenotype-first approach, and may identify causal factors that have previously been obscured by clinical heterogeneity, penetrance, and expressivity.

On a pedigree, polygenic diseases do tend to "run in families", but the inheritance does not fit simple patterns as with Mendelian diseases. But this does not mean that the genes cannot eventually be located and studied. There is also a strong environmental component to many of them (e.g., blood pressure).

asthma
autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis
cancers
ciliopathies
cleft palate
diabetes
heart disease
hypertension
inflammatory bowel disease
intellectual disability
mood disorder
obesity
refractive error
infertility

To add on for legit this time, most people with serious genetic conditions will just die out (hard to fuck when blind and a downie) and people can just choose to adopt if diagnosed with non active serious confitions

Nobody needs to be sterilized because of that, lmao

I think the OP is retarded and we should just apply mild social pressure to eliminate this kind of thing (like in the Nordic states) but that doesn't mean you're any more correct.

If it's heritable, it's a perfectly good reason for sterilization. If anyone has the potential to pass on heritable illnesses / disorders to their children they should be sterilized. It goes beyond the wishes and feelings of the individuals. Think of anti-vaxxers: should we really allow them to forgo vaccination over pseudo-science when not doing so has caused measles outbreaks in some areas of the US? Of course they vaccination should be mandatory because its effects go beyond the individual, just like sterilization in the cases described ITT