Are sports bourgeois?

Its really terrible how socialist countries were obsessed in the useless endevour of sports.


Exercise and healthy lifestyle can be encouraged without having to pour in billions in organized sports teams filled by millionaires that dont contribute anything to the working class's wellbeing.

Attached: bread.jpg (636x960, 138.71K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jTnOmruhRLc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

t. Zig Forumsyp trying to start useless discussion

Pol is obsessed with sports though

exactly

Pol supports sports as they believe its an effort to show the superior physique of the aryan man and because they associate it with masculinity.

t. butthurt liberal

i love sports and they can be done without big ass stadiums and teaching people to not be angry when their team loses end of the discussion

Stadiums are only one aspect. An ideal socialist state would pay olympic athletes poorly and not invest much in expensive sports equipment because these athletes don't contribute to the economy.Also sports schools should get minimal funding too.

Watching sports? Nah. That's a past-time for all classes. But sponsoring them and owning sports teams is certainly bourgeois.

Seems reasonable considering how overly glorified sports are as a means of bread and circuses. Don't remove them, but tone down their importance.