NatSocDem?

Why do people still call Hitler a socialist when what he did was clearly capitalism with a large welfare and military budget?
Would National Social Democrat be a more accurate label? (unironically)

Attached: YZwYHic.jpg (639x405, 30.22K)

Strasserists + NazBols have been calling him a NutSacDem since the beginning. It's their main critique of him.

MLs did it the other way round and relabeled socdems to social fascists.

Hurr durr durrrr

More like SucDemNuts amirite?

Because Marxists and NationaI SociaIist have different definitions of Socialism

NationaI SociaIism gives the means of production to the volk of the nation where as Marxism gives it to the proletariat

Also the USSR had a large welfare and military budget

Because western liberals have a vested interest in absolving western capitalism of its past sins (i.e. the fact that all of them supported Hitler) and make socialism seem evil in the eyes of the proles.

How can you expect to be taken seriously when what you define as socialism is indistinguishable from capitalism?

except its not

In what ways was Germany under the NSDAP not capitalist? Was the majority of the economy not organised in capitalist enterprises? Were capitalists not key players in the German government?

German industry was taken from foreign financiers, industry was under heavy state supervision, the entire economy was ran for the betterment of Germany not for profits.

No NationaI SociaIists were

read a fucking book you dumbass ignorant cracker

Imagine believing this shit.

but you have no counter to that

Ah yes, the noted socialist, international financier banker Hjalmar Schacht lol

It's subjective since Nazis define "slaughtering innocent Russians" as being something that is "for the betterment of Germany." You can't reason with fascists. You can only marginalize and eventually eliminate them. Personally I see Hitler as a shittier version of FDR (a capitalist.)

There were classes, workers didn't own the means of production, Nazi "socialism" was openly antagonistic to Marxism and any other conception of socialism. In practice their "socialist" pretensions were demagogy meant to draw voters away from the SPD and KPD.

wew

We have no real issues with your economic policies and intragroup egalitarianism, it's that you're led by, owned by, and enslaved to kykes.

– Zig Forums

By privatizing the economy, purging all the "left-leaning" elements of the NSDAP, persecuting socialists, invading and attempting to destroy the Soviet Union and "Jewish Bolshevism"? what kind of "socialism" is that? only in name, nothing the Nazis did was socialist in nature. and don't give me that "socialism but not marxism" bullshit, you can't just steal the term socialism, get rid of everything that makes it socialist, then claim that it's yours (or that you're the "real socialists" like i see a lot of Not Socialists do).

Choose only one. You mean the president with a Communist Jew vice president warmonger? I don't know any "capitalist" that would have a Communist Jew vice president warmonger. Even the kike puppet GW Bush didn't have someone as bad as FDR's Communist Jew VP, Henry Wallace.

He was German


Well they were at war so,,,

/thread

nope

Because a large welfare budget basically entails socialism?

Marxism IS socialism you stupid faggot, "class collaboration for the betterment of random country" is arguably the worst thing Nazis brought into left discussion.