So can we all agree that this is caused by capitalism at least?
Sex and leftism
No I'm saying personality is a pretty innate part of a person that isn't changed by economic downturns. I find people that say that it does to be the type that have poor empathy skills, and therefore can't judge a person's personality well to begin with.
Yes stop it with this "babe in the woods''' excuse feminists always trot out to rationalize reactionary behavior from women.
STOP ABUSING EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
Well I've seen them. And they regularly linger at the top of the board when mods allowed them so I think you're lying about this to be frank.
Yeah, but if you're intellectually honest you will refute it with arguments. Dogpiling is essentially an tantrum.
No you're just torturing spooks, prescribing all these motivations without a wit of evidence.
It's very simple, people react badly to incel sympathy because it undermines the liberal meritocratic myth.
It's literately in their name, incel, involuntary, as this is not my fault. And liberals like clockwork get triggered by the undermining of this, because if more men starting thinking the system isn't working for them, then their own interest would be threatened.
HA HA HA HA HA HA
Seems a likely scenario. Still better than the nuclear family. There are a lot of soft harems going on right now but women are pretty resentful about it. They want to be the high status man's only woman. Does anyone remember that Jodi Arias case from a few years ago?
Yeah why don't you jump off a bridge and see if a lack of political belief in gravity will stop you from dying.
Well how the fuck are you going to fall in love if you cannot start from a basis of trust? Nobody is going to start a relationship (which costs disposeable income) when they are broke, live with their parents (so they have nowhere that is not precarious to fuck), stressed from work. People are perfectly alienated there is no free social places, suburban sprawl ensures that.
"Love" is completely corrupted by capital. Get the fuck out of here with your idealized bullshit. People who are actually "successful" in "love" always come from a financially secure background. To be clear I am not talking about just people fucking like a one night stand.
The friends that I have that are married of course all have decently paying jobs and can afford houses.
dude this is why you need materialism
These threads are always cancer
That's why /pol keeps starting them.
Since this is caused by capitalism the solution is pretty simple: become a communist and overthrow capitalism. No idea why MRAs and incels don't want to do this.
Easy, no pre-martial sex is in the best intrests of any man or woman no in the top 20% of most sexually attractive.
Otherwise we get what we have now. Women that get sex but no commitment through out their 20's and wind up a single mother or cat lady. And men that get neither sex nor commitment when they are young, and wind up wholly unwilling to commit latter on with women.
Easier divorces for men. If neither men nor women could exploit each other via divorce then only men and women that wanted to be together for love would be wed.
It's stops haremization. The only reason why women and feminist white knights like you, are going along with sexual liberation is because women think it can be used for upward mobility. They aren't "stuck" with some poor schlub. What they are slowly realizing is that they are going to be left off alot worse then they were under more traditional ways of pairing people.
because they dream of women being their property