Right wing accelerationist here. I am pretty blackpilled on the state of society. How can I help Bernie win?

Comrade, it does not matter which name you use.
They are all the same group and must be liquidated.

Euphemisms are okay around non-redpilled people. Killing them is more publicly acceptable when they are called "the 1%", "bourgeois revisionists" or "rich elites."
Embrace Stalin.

youtube.com/channel/UCzj_jBdoppML-t9DQIEMqrg/featured

The Jew is using 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 I S L A M 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 as muscle against you! The Muslim, like Christianity, is a Jewish Proxy. WHITE POWER!

This.

Do not bring identity politics into this. Our enemies are comprised of a specific class, and all groups of people fall into such categories.

The bourgeois revisionists must be killed, Stalin's soul wills this outcome.

what a larp

Ok. So that is why Stalin got so antisemitic towards the end. He got fucked in the ass by Jews!

Class has nothing to do with it because Zig Forums doesn't operate in economic terms. Do I even have to say this?

Oil-rich Islamic monarchs and Chinese oligarchs are not Jews.

OK. But I thought you were talking about the white/western world

If Jews controlled Islam then why do they have so many problems with the muslims in the occupied territories?

Nazis don't think when they come up with them

Attached: b90b2fb40ada6dab61f65e9790237e560631dfd0.png (499x625, 49.48K)

Translation; I don't want to go out of my intellectual comfort zone and talk to Nazis"

Hes literally the antidote for social unrest.

Translation: I'm a bootlicker

Even in the Western world, Jews are only disproportionately represented in the ruling class, and for concrete historical reasons that don't require inane essentialism. The majority are whites, because the white ruling class doesn't give a fuck about you.

Kalergi plan.
But anyway that doesn't matter, building true Socialism means eliminating Jews.
Everything economic, everything social, everything political all points toward Jewish control.

Makes no sense since far right wing politics in practice always ends in defeat.

Attached: stalin berlin3.jpg (1772x1974, 389.55K)

Humans are right wing by default.
Tell me : What happens when people stop believing in right wing worldviews, and consequently give up ingroup loyalty, shun religious morals, and stop treasuring human life?
These events occur.

1. : Collapsing birth rates.
2. : Allowing foreign invasion especially of migrants.
3. : Lack of stable families.
4. : Prevalent mental illness.
5. : Widespread nihilism and hopelessness.
6. : Social atomization.
7. : Civilizational collapse.

Right wing politics promote and protect life including civilizations.
Leftism destroys life.

You come off as a meme-fag, tbh. At least get your facts straight before you attempt to 'fit in' with us, for crying out loud.

Nope, we were primitive communists for two hundred thousand years as hunter/gathers living in tribal society. The "right" wing as you imagine today has basically just came out of property rights and Liberalism in the last few hundred years. It's basically the least natural thing which exists. There is nothing natural about 1950's conservative era thought and the American dream even the nuclear family unit is a entirely new way of organizing a family unit since Medieval serfs,industrial revolution families or hunter/gathers didn't live in a nuclear family.
Capitalism causes this, the birth rates in Socialist countries was far higher as workers had guaranteed Jobs and houses and access to education and healthcare.
Capitalism causes mass migration though wars and the division of wealth. Why do you think people in the country move to Cities ever since the Industrial revolution?
More Capitalistic problems as Capitalism kicks families from their homes causes them to have poor education and therefore violent abusive households and lack of job opportunities.
Capitalism is a great prevaricator of mental illness, stressed out wage laboures the unemployed,pay check to pay check and Aliened workers all suffer vastly under Capitalism and the late stage capitalistic culture. Emoji movie, internet connected salt shakers and the commodification of human relations. USSR had dance halls and easily accessible and free places for the public to hang out. America had the beginnings of an alienated society forming.
Capitalism again, even then it's the Right wing taking the "black pills" and the Left wing actually looking to fix climate change and the numerous wars and exploitation going on.
Capitalism once again turning human relation into commodities. Anything to make a profit.
Will occur thanks to Capitalism, World war III,Environmental collapse,Neo-liberal bourgeoisie controlled technocratic Black mirror tier hellholes

This may be the worst post I've ever seen on this board. Congrats.

Attached: 1aa175507fce8ae9bd528373aa8251a36b9ec92291fffa5c4642fa393fcd72dc.jpg (414x414, 29.88K)

Spooks

Epic spooks

Extreme mega master ghost house

...

kill yourself and the people around you

Tribal societies are pretty reactionary though

the right existed long before that.

agreed

none of this contradicts what was that original point

Not really, the share of the tribes workload was divided between members as well as food and shelter. Men and women received equal burial grounds/burial items. In-fact many tribes were actually Matriarchal and everyone in the tribe was a equal family member of course elders were shown respect for their knowledge but that's not a class distinction nor class rule. This went on for two hundred thousand years before the first permanent agricultural settlements. The conservative "Right wing" on the other hand has barely been a thing for two hundred years and is an entirely unnatural phenomenon spawned from modern capitalism and Liberalism.
Not the conservative idea of today you call the Right, Ancient society's would simply kill you for saying the King isn't ordained by God and the idea a peasant should own his own property be able to choose his own job and where he lives would be the most outrageous thing. Even if you consider literally everything pre 19th century to early agricultural right wing (not true as many other peasant republics and proto-Socialist lite society's existed) it's still vastly outweighed by the literal two hundred thousand years of primitive Communism compared to what 3000 years maybe of Classic Ancient Society's.

Attached: dialectical-materialism.jpg (720x705, 36.54K)

this might be true for some small parts of the world but everything Indo European in origin was very war like and patriarchal.

this is only true for the capitalist side of the Right which only came to being ~200 years ago.

yeah

this might be true for some small parts of the world but everything Indo European in origin was very war like and patriarchal.

can't be empirically proven

Kikes know they can defeat/subvert brown people because they are stupid and more easily manipulated.

wew

Attached: 1539673749056.png (578x705, 674.97K)

Then define Right wing politics. Because Nationalism for instance didn't develop until the idea of modern nation states. free movement of goods in a unrestricted trade society also didn't exist until the beginnings of Capitalism and ""Authoritarianism/anti-democratic"" practices is not inherently a Right wing belief. For example the Inca's despite being a monarchy ran a communally owned centrally planned economy with focus on public infrastructure and peasants got rations and goods from the central planners then from trading and bartering.
That's simply not historically true, Hunter/Gatherer society's were incredibly peaceful and conflict between groups was incredibly rare. You are referring to the conquests and migrations of Indo-Europeans on wheeled chariots wielding Bronze weaponry after the start of agricultural and domestication. Which doesn't change the other two hundred thousand years of peaceful proto-communism in hunter/gather society's.

hierarchy is natural and good for a cohesive society

Nope. While conflict was rare as they did not come into contact with different groups frequently when they did they were war like.

It was only recorded in the Bronze age but this was the way of the indo europeans since primordial times

That's not entirely right wing. For example some people are going to be more popular in a Socialist society and are going to be higher in a social hierarchy. Just not an economic one. Stalin for example held great power but was quite obviously Left wing.
That's literally not true, the indo European civilizations you're talking about didn't exist until agricultural and domestication was invented because it's hard to ride a chariot when you don't even have domesticated horses yet. Before the Indo-Europeans invaded and spread throughout Europe the hunter/gathers who existed before the Indo-Europeans who lived in Europe were very peaceful. Look up "Old Europe" it's a archaeological term to describe Europe before the arrival of warlike Indo-Europeans who brought patriarchal and violent society's which before them didn't exist within Europe or it's indigenous peoples.
There were Europeans living in proto-communist hunter/gatherer society for two hundred thousand years before the warlike and yes brought Patriarchal Indo-Europeans turned up.

Not only is all of what you said bullshit, as humans have for thousands of years lived in communal settings, but even those things you listed all happened in capitalist countries, while they never happened in socialist countries.

Ironic because Muslims ("brown people") are a lot more openly anti-zionist and anti-semitic than any whites.

It can be very easily. Every society's art, culture, law, politics, etc - directly reflected the mode of production and power relations in that society. You can't name a single example of this not being the case.

And your example isn't even of a society that achieved communism.
Also the left tends to want to abolish hierarchies.

The indo Europeans were first documented after civilization because you need writhing to document things but that doesn't meam they just appeared as soon as people became civilized.
Also they wiped out old Europe and people today have almost nothing in common with them when compared to the indo European

Most people are closer related to the indo Europeans than old europeans

except that can't be proven to be the case.
It can only be inferred

lol no
nature.com/articles/srep18634

yes

Please don't vote for Bernie. There are so many progressive candidates this time around. Warren is essentially a carbon copy of Sanders, but she isn't completely cucked over to the worst of the liberals. He may have been the better pick in 2016, but now that there are some realistic contenders, we should go for someone better.

Attached: boiniesandahsdotcom.jpg (700x467, 76.16K)