sorry, but no. Your clinging on this one word is just insane.
Former fascist here
hey you know you still havent provided a source for "tens of millions" killed under communism
She said it wasn't historical research, it wasn't even his own anecdotal experience, it was folklore and she doesn't understand why people in the west take it for granted or as authoritative. You're exactly the sort of person she's talking about.
I know you want to believe santa is real but you eventually have to grow up and realise he isn't. But i see you've completely given up on arguments and are frantically deflecting and trying to disengage because you've realised how hopelessly out of your depth you are and you want to leave with your dignity intact.
Why is it the faggots who come in crowing about good faith that always descend into non-arguments fastest?
We really appreciate you coming along to learn and open your mind to stuff. I hope my post (>>2852461) put some stuff into perspective. Just don't let the LARPers scare you away.
you also said the USSR was built on slave labour and didn't provide a source.
here is one for capitalism and fascism though telegraph.co.uk
If you truly love your country you have to be anti-capitalist. And yes fascism is still capitalist.
Antizionism ≠ Antisemitism
Steve wants to build a house.
For that, Steve needs a plethora of resources, most importantly; wood.
So, seeing that he needs wood, he goes to John, a lumberjack.
At John's place, he buys X amount of wooden logs, agreeing to John's terms and paying him accordingly.
Now that he has the materials needed to build a house, Steve asks Bob and Jim to help him build his house.
Of course, Bob and Jim won't work for free, thus they agree that for a certain price they will help build his house.
Steve is content with the terms and agrees on them. So they start building the house.
During the building of the house, Steve pays Bob and Jim the amount of money written down in the terms of their job contract in regular, agreed upon periods.
Once the house has finished building, Bob and Jim's contract is fulfilled and they bid Steve farewell.
Steve, now with his new house, decides that it is a good idea to rent it out, due to being cut from his job for lacking qualification; thus he offers up his house in exchange for regular payment.
Mary and Bob, one of the former workers see that his house is up for rent and go to Steve to rent it out.
Steve then decides to rent out the house to the couple, in exchange for their monthly contribution via rent.
As both parties agree on the terms, Bob later starts thinking about all things socialist.
Now, the question is, does Bob have any claim on living in the house for a reduced price, since he worked on it himself?
muh mudpies
In the left we haven't conspiracy theories or clickbait bull shit calling for attention, the left is a science, so at least the scientific socialism is very hard to undestand if you dosen't read a book about Marxist theories.>>2852448