Its not meaningful to define "white" without the context of settler-colonialism
The irish and italians weren't "white" up until a few decades back
Against the academic left
The fuck is an anarcho-bolshevik?
It sounds like what a reactionary would call any ideology that isn't fascism
Would the IWW be considered the "white left"?
Irrelevant to the point he made, the Red Army was white by a vaaaaaast margin, and Russia didn't gobble up all that territory by being nice either.
Don't get me wrong, I've massive respect for BPP, but what did they accomplish other than being utterly crushed the moment they became even remotely a threat? "Becoming a threat" is not an achievement in itself if you don't have the numbers, the organizing ability or the strategy to actually capitalize on that threat. To say that some "black" groups were more succesfull than some "white" groups means nothing in Burgersville, because looking at it from even a corrupt SucDem country, they achieved fuck all. And they will continue to achieve fuck all because of your racial bickering.
Siberia.png
So the eight hour work day, female suffrage, suffrage for non-landowners, abolition of slavery, and free land to all those wiling to work it is nothing.
What lasting impact have the Black Panthers had? They were a group that lasted about a decade and have fuck all affect on the present. Name one, just one social reform that was passed as a result of the black panthers.
academic left/marxists are almost all revisionists and reactionaries.
I've seen this posted twice as if it's somehow directed at left wing students or students in general. He specifically says "reactionary students".