How come the wealthy families in china are the same ones that existed before the revolution?

just post the sauces. it will be easier for everyone.

the archive takes a fucking minute to open fuck you nigger i have things to do

酱

Attached: 5375-63116-original.jpeg (1600x900, 88.17K)

My dad works at nintendo (wealthy chinese company) and can confirm OP's story.

Can you provide the thread, then… or not?

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1280x720, 199.93K)

Tbh I remember the thread too. But yeah there's no way I'm going to find it now.

thats not true

This is probably what OP is referring to:
qz.com/314720/heres-the-surprising-social-trait-that-the-english-and-chinese-have-in-common/

Attached: chinese-politicians.jpg (1100x618, 86.45K)

Nope, there were pictures taken out of a book or article.

Y'all are the ones misremembering. There was a whole discussion about it but the origin of it was a Zig Forumsyo who trying to argue that wealth inequality is somehow tied to genetics and race, hence why he brought up the claim that even after a communist revolution the same people end up in power because they are genetically superior. The conclusion of that thread was that the Zig Forumsyp was stupid, didn't know what he was talking about, and got disproved by the fact that all Soviet leaders had working-class background, so did all East German leaders, etc.

Well considering the national bourgeoisie was never as 100% expropriated like in Russia, this isn't very surprising. It just confirms that the Cultural Revolution seems to have been completely idealistic. As for socialist politicians, I don't care if they are nobleman or whatever. That just makes them class traitors.

The cultural revolution was literally just Mao trying to prove he was the most "revolutionary"

Wow excellent analysis

Attached: received_632140260556995.jpeg (2448x3264, 413.31K)

It was mostly disastrous for China and the CPC itself has repudiated it.

Retarded posts

The Cultural Revolution was a success that should not only be praised, but replicated.

You must be thinking of a different thread or subargument. He was explicitly talking about the national bourgeoisie, with servants and whatnot, and how that continued though the Mao era into the present.

My fellow nigga you may be thinking of another thread, this isn't it.

It was a failure but only because it didn't go far enough since Mao cucked out.

agree

Based. Russia is prime example of that.

What did they mean by this?

I know right? When the CPSU ended up supporting capitalism more than the working class you know things went well.