You can not be a marxist and believe in bullshit like intersectionalism

Lol yeah my man, that's why Marx and Engels wrote about dismantling traditional, patriarchal families based on property relations and unpaid female domestic labor. That's why people like Fanon used the materialist method in the anti-colonial struggle. Clearly diamat is for oppressed gamers though.

out of honest interest, have you a good book or article about that women were hunters?

Nah. Mods just let these masked nazi threads run wild. There ste plenty of them active.

Also said belief is a porky propaganda move that all the fucking liberals fell for, and many 'marxists' as well :(

"The Jewish NIGGER Lassalle who, I'm glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a 'friend', even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. In this he bases himself on the view that he ought to live the life of a Jewish baron, or Jew created a baron (no doubt by the countess). Just imagine! This fellow, knowing about the American affair, etc., and hence about the state of crisis I'm in, had the insolence to ask me whether I would be willing to hand over one of my daughters to la Hatzfeldt as a 'companion', and whether he himself should secure Gersten-berg's (!) patronage for me! The fellow has wasted my time and, what is more, the dolt opined that, since I was not engaged upon any 'business' just now, but merely upon a 'theoretical work', I might just as well kill time with him! In order to keep up certain dehors vis-à-vis the fellow, my wife had to put in pawn everything that wasn't actually nailed or bolted down!

…

It is now quite plain to me—as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify—that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses' flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a NIGGER). NOW, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow's importunity is also niggerlike. "

–Marx To Engels in Manchester [London,] 30 July 1862

Name a place I history where this has happened faggot.

Thing about intersectionailty if you actually read krenshaw is that she points to class as the largest intersection. Even talks about how, for example, middle class white women in America often did “feminism” that had a negative impact on working class black men, for example.

It’s just tumblrinas don’t actually read the shit they just learn from dumb memes

(Same with half the “Marxists” here and the fascists on Zig Forums they like to get opinionated about stuff they really don’t know much about)

I don't see what's so wrong with this

None of this is intersectionalism

It should hurt to be retarded.

It literally is though. You are conflating socialist feminism and emancipatory politics with idpol and liberal white feminism. Marxism is frankly more intersectional than any liberal variant because liberalism disregards fundamental economic contradictions in capitalism and labor alienation.

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-ted-kaczynski-letter-to-an-anonymous-german

You write: “Let us not deceive ourselves about the real role of women.” If you mean that motherhood is the only suitable role for women, then I disagree. Quite apart from child-rearing, women have always done very important, even indispensable work, and work that was often very hard physically or required great skill. To mention only a few examples: Among the Mbuti pygmies of Africa and exclusive of child-rearing, the women worked far more than the men, they provided the greater part of the food, they built the huts, and their work was often very hard. Among other things, they carried huge stacks of firewood into camp on their backs.[4] The women of hunting-and-gathering societies of warm climates usually provided the greater part of the food, whereas in cold countries the men provided the greater part through hunting.[5] But in cold countries the women produced the clothing,[6] which in such climates was indispensable, and in doing so the women of certain hunting-and-gathering societies showed extraordinary skill.[7]
———————————————————————
theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists

wideopenspaces.com/huntresses-throughout-history/

No. Intersectionalism specifically rejects class as the basis of all oppression and exploitation, opting instead for a more interlaced approach in which many different fields and areas of oppression come together to form an interdependent set of structures. It does not hold class in particular as the basis. A materialist analysis of social issues does not equal intersectionalism, which has its own theory behind it completely and which cannot be jammed into or compared to Marxism retroactively post-inception.

Also, why the hell was this thread locked? Out of all the threads up, this one showed no signs of not being tame.

The intersectional theory claims that these issues are not separate from each other, not necessarily that one is not more relevant than the other. There is definitely a hierarchization of the levels of oppression and a lot of the times, yes it is actually the material conditions that are taken most into consideration. What do you make of the gender wage gap, gentrification and lack of medical access without the dialectical method? Marxism and true intersectionality are one and the same.

mods are peices of shit

That's one of the issues though, Marxism by itself already states that one is more relevant than the others.
And I'm saying they are not because "true intersectionality" is still a completely different theory from Marxism and materialism itself. You cannot retroactively declare Marxism intersectional after the delvelopment of intersectional theory.

anchoring isn't thread locking you dumb fuck