Why does Zig Forums hate the nuclear family, tradition, the white race and the nation?

Is this a rhetorical question? Imperialism is what makes first world countries so much better to live in than third world shitholes.

We unironically need diverse types of family structures. Read up about this.

Attached: 17borderlines-map-blog427[1].jpg (427x400, 48.7K)

what do those even mean?

anglo bullshit, the "family" as precieved by americans and anglos is unironically d*generate.
literally non-existant 100% pure fucking spooks.
le milk man
a backwards and idiotic way to organise communities. A thing that shold have been destroyed hundreds of years ago.

Because it sucks and you know it.

It's normal to develop hate and resentment for what you will never have or be a part of.

Because they’re gay.

It's funny because capitalism is destroying all of this things (even the nation-state) in the US.

We don't. Capitalism destroyed the community and then the family by pushing these groups off their land. Capitalism hates the family

(also the nuclear family is kike shit that only existed for a brief period post ww2, the extended family, situated in a community of extended families, is the real shit)

exactly why i'm marrying a cute jewish gf

no honest socialist worth their salt cares about you being white or not.

socialism will protect the family more than capitalism.

some traditions can be kept, retarded ones will not.

the nation will have supremacy over 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧private interests🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 because the nation will represent the will of the people (not the will of the bourgeoisie).

...

Why is no one mentioning the fact that the "nuclear family" is a individualist concept.
What true socialist want is not to destroy family and every one do orgies in the street, rather have a primary focus on ones community rather than hide away and treat your neighbor as a stranger.

Why are some of you defending this social structure that has only served to create the boomer generation. The most hostile generation that has no tolerance what so ever for a sway from conformity, look at their fear of communism. And their is no way in my opinion that people who focus first on their family will not hinder communism.

what you mean with cultural Marxism is actually just culture war, that has existed long before Marx. Also capitalism does try to commodify it and that inflames the culture war drastically.

there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with a nuclear family,as a social form,as long as it's not used for building dynastic wealth by combining real estate via arranged marriages.

Socialists will probably pursue more communal forms because collective child care is less stressful for parents because some parental duties can be shared , and as result it would probably result in higher levels of care per child for a given level of care-effort. Lets face it many kids today are raised by the entertainment industry rather than interactions with human beings, so the particular opinions on details about how kids should be raised seem a bit remote. There is the hope that parental choices with regards to high investment in care for children is at least partially learned behaviour, that would be perpetuated.

your family home counts as personal property, it only becomes private property when you rent it out.

Nuclear family is not traditional, it's fairly new phenomenon, traditional in most places was multi-generational/extended family households, Nuclear families also coincides with reduction in religiosity, although that might be coincidental.

national sentiment is eroded by neo-liberalism, that seeks out to atomize the individual. Also neo-liberal capitalism is opposed to Christianity, because popular free-market economists in some aspects behave like priests of a competing religion. Christianity has the Transubstantiation where the piece of bread is spiritually transformed into the body of Christ. This stands in sectarian opposition to the transformation in market exchanges where money is transformed into a good or service. Basically they behave like religions competing about whose transformation is more important to people.

The decay in society is a by-product of capitalism: family, religion, private property and the nation aren't an antidote to this decay. You have to actually fix causes.

It's even more ridiculous that you faggots defend this.
How to right wingers reconcile being for "traditional family values" while at the still time supporting something that broke the same away as the nuclear family.
At one hand you cry about muh tribe, but at the other are happy about it being broken into these small family units.

Reminder that left nationalism is real and makes more sense that right nationalism

who the hell wants an explosive family?

You would if you knew it meant the bed

id like to splode inna girl without the worry of having annoying rugrats pop out of her.

People are stupid as fuck

Attached: marx magic.png (357x615, 104.37K)

nuclear family has roots all the way back to the 16th century western Europe, especially amongst the Dutch and the english

no wonder you all hate the nuclear family so much, you're all degenerate inbred cousin fuckers who marry their sisters and live in degenerate clan families of 100 people under one roof

we want nuclear families not extended Arabian clan families bye bye extended families

aren't most states with legal incest red states? i'm sure most actual incest families believe they represent the nuclear family and western tradition etc

Nuclear family is a over rated. The ideal is a joint family where the father, mother, children, cousins, uncles, grand parents, etc… who lived in a single household and shared resources. It was the ideal before the creation of 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧liberalism🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧.
Define tradition. Anyways if by tradition you meant biblical and Christian values, then socialism is more Christianity compatible than capitalism will ever be.
Race doesn't exist. Ethnic differences vary from region to region(more as a spectrum rather than as a definite racial changes) but all of them belong to the same human race.
Nations as a concept are a modern creation and had no place in the traditional order. In the past nations were as malleable as an amoebae. The idea of definite region that people of a particular artificial grouping should stay in is pretty dumb.

Attached: ZbItTkx_d.jpg (600x539, 31.51K)

This

Attached: Nehru.jpg (800x667, 56.82K)

Too high Autism Level post. Not that polacks would understand that.

Attached: 1532192612338.png (1665x1049, 2.92M)

We need joint family instead of nuclear family
We need paganism/pantheism/deism/dharmism instead of christianity or other dogmatic faiths for that matter
We need ethnic identities instead of racial identities
We need freedom of movement for individuals instead of definite regions for all individuals to live in