Sociologically, has transsexualism and transgenderism risen in recent years, or is it simply more socially acceptable to be openly trans? How much of it is based in dysphoria and how much of it is sexual?
Sociologically, has transsexualism and transgenderism risen in recent years, or...
Other urls found in this thread:
Like most of the LBGT community they do form part of a very small demographic, compared to the rest of the world population. They only stand out in social media because idpol.
Anecdotally though, they appear to be increasingly common. "egg" communities seem to attract and influence a lot of youth.
Please don't associate traps with transsexuals. They're two different things. Traps are males who wear girls' clothes, transsexuals are males who undergo hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery to become girls. One's mental, the other isn't. Sage because there's a containment thread for gender issues.
That could definitely be true
Please don't associate traps with tanssexuals
I don't. Some trans people are doing that to themselves.
Felix isn't gay, he's just a crossdresser.
I don't think neither the japanese, neither trans, neither anyone really knows what the fuck a trap is. Their name in japanese isn't even trap, is some other word that doesn't have anything to do with them "trapping" guys into thinking they are girls.
And yet the general trans communities associate with them, but consider trap a slur
It's not exclusively a slur, but it can be used as one when it is used to imply trickery and justify trans panic violence.
No they're just both autogynohiles just some are more delusional than others
It's sissy porn addicts dressing up as women because it turns them on to be thought of as, what is in their mind, the submissive sex
When you look into it, the AGP/feminine homosexual typology is so obvious
Notice how this agp male associates womanhood with what he sees in pornography.
Oh wow the fact an idea is contentious means fucking nothing
Israeli pharmaceutical firms are making a killing selling you your estrogens while Jewish owned media normalizing trannies
really polarized those protons doesn't? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
capitalist marketing is responsible for getting people to buy shit they don't need EXCEPT for mutilation your penis and taking lady hormones
lmfao at you're lives you trannies
I'm not sure how cherry-picking screenies means anything either.
Anyway take this to the gender crit thread pls
A couple with a young boy walks into a doctor's clinic. They say that they found their child wearing one of his sister's dresses in his room one day.
The doctor says, "Oh, it must be a latent desire to be a girl" - and so, hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery is performed. The parents worry that the boy may not actually want to be a girl, but the doctor reassures them - "What else would explain him wanting to wear dresses?". "Perhaps he's just gay and wants to look pretty?" says the mother.
The doctor accuses the parents of transphobia, but not before ruining their child's life, of course :^)
You don't want to be a transphobe, do you? Homosexuals are just transsexuals who haven't been sold tittyskittles yet, and anyone who thinks homosexuality is okay is a disgusting transphobe.
We Saudi Arabia nao.
This just validates the idea of gender being garbage because not only does it not have any material basis, but the idea causes people to essentialize gender roles based on what they like to wear or the aesthetic they enjoy (i.e. I like wearing "girly" clothing and having an "feminine" aesthetic, therefore I must be a girl on the inside).
Sex exists, but gender does not.
Exactly. Transgender ideology reifies gender and says it is something innate in people's minds. That someone can be "born in the wrong body" and other idealist nonsense. In reality there is only sex and sexist stereotypes and as feminists we seek to abolish those stereotypes, not reifie them.
It's all such a pain in the ass when the two terms get conflated. I hate that gender and sex are being semantically redefined and muddied because people can't distinguish the two without hysterics. That being said, can sex have an influence on gender definitions or is that altogether just a furthering of misplaced reification of gender? Is gender a useless term, at least in its current form?
I believe gender is a useless term for the reasons explained here
However some people use the word gender to describe sex roles.
As marxists, we understand that sex roles are a result of the need to control reproductive labor and to enable the passage of private property from one generation to another. In this sense sex roles are influenced by sex. It is women's role in reproduction and the social relationships surrounding reproduction that are the source of their oppression
(i.e. I like wearing "girly" clothing and having an "feminine" aesthetic, therefore I must be a girl on the inside).
I mean to be fair it's not just an aesthetic appeal. A lot of them are genuinely distressed to the point of mutilation and suicide by their own bodies, and when provided with hormones and surgical intervention those feelings go away. That's not just liking to wear girly clothing.
Interesting. I suppose its possible that increased recognition of gender can be attributed to the desire for people to overcome the criticism that comes with overstepping the boundaries of stereotypically defined characteristics of sex. If one can switch sexes instead of destroying the stereotypes in place, you end up with an endemic of sexually confused people who would rather conform to the sex based norms instead of realizing it doesn't matter. So tiring.
Fag thread anchored
Goooood niiiiiight homooosexuaaaaaallls!
Jesus christ, there's a containment thread for this BS.
Trannies deserve a shot to head. They're nothing but useless trouble and escapism.
cockshott should stick to numbers instead of moralizing other people
the goal of women’s liberation is achieved through the abolition of gender. Such an abolition results from resolving the dialectical contradiction between men and women as classes. As such, it must be achieved through class struggle. Wittig explains, “Our fight aims to suppress men as a class, not through a genocidal, but a political struggle. Once the class ‘men’ disappears, ‘women’ as a class will disappear as well…” Women’s liberation requires abolition of the conditions which produce womanhood in the first place.
what are you getting at with these underlines? it says right in the post this is normal and medically recognized?
The highlights are delusions. Women don't get turned on at the fact they have boobs or whatever
how much of it is sexual
everything is sexual
are you really getting your "science" from reddit?
Nothing is sexual. Sex is the biggest bullshit ever sold to humanity.
<being this woke
y'know, there is truth to this. Ejaculation in mystic understandings is seen as a low form of magic, look at Jesus, he did not masturbate or have sex, he was holy, same in the way of buddha and yogis today.
mystic spiritual systems in their logical conclusion advocate for the death of humanity through abstinence. Okay, so we have sex and eventually we are here and the earth is being destroyed - sex is the creative gateway to further destruction of the universe.
In serious matters, I truly believe that much of sexual activity today is an ideological and economic construction, rather than an expression of true intention.
Trans Commune when
mystic spiritual systems in their logical conclusion advocate for the death of humanity through abstinence.
objectively speaking advocacy of abstinence only effects those that are suggestible by "mystic spiritual systems", so it's only stopping the procreation of that group.