Comrades, my friends are fucking anti-feminists and want to convert dem to anarcho-communism. Any tips n tricks for dis?

Comrades, my friends are fucking anti-feminists and want to convert dem to anarcho-communism. Any tips n tricks for dis?

Attached: 1522168186278.png (260x279, 51.82K)

empirical LTVpill, followed by theoretical LTVpill, followed by classpill, followed by whatever snowflake left-sectarian pills you want them to take

Just tell them basically "women don't matter, the decentralization of power does".

tell them feminism has nothing with communism. Get them to read Mutual Aid or just tell them how anarcho communism is human nature, and that early anarchists like Bakunin and Proudhon weren't feminists.

i don't get it, why would you want to go to the lengths of making them anarcho fucking communists when they not only not support feminism but are actively against it? it's like telling me you have a race realist friend and asking me how to turn him into a radical communist.

Bakunin was a feminist, though.

Feminism is a part of socialism through its rejection of reactionary adherence to maintaining a status quo in practice regardless of what "social.ly conservative" socialists like to think.

socialist feminism has basically no relation to feminism as practised in the west in 2019 though.


Idk, maybe try give them this argument in reverse I guess? "If you're anti-feminist, you must be anti-capitalist, and remove the power of corporations to push manufactured identity wars on you"

Attached: anti racist must be anti capitalist.jpg (480x402, 46.89K)

Because western feminism is bourgeois politics.

Feminism is anti-communist. Marx himself kicked out a prominent feminist (and later investment banker, really maeks u think…) out of a socialist party.

Attached: lenin_womens_question.png (797x610, 97.7K)

Liberalism is anti-communist. Liberals have the Midas touch, except every cause they touch turns to shit.

who dis

Because she was a wrecker

Correct

Victoria Woodhull

There is no need for repetition, I already said she was a feminist.

Attached: thot_patrol.jpg (923x785, 119.83K)

This thread sucks now.

Good christ, read your own picture.

It, is, as it is not a contradiction with capitalism - unlike proletarian revolution.

Attached: feminist_imperialism_drone_strikes.jpg (609x586, 65.06K)

Fucking read this: printage.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/friedrich-engels-theory-of-the-origins-of-patriarchy

A communist has to be a feminist.

Smoothbrain.

To summarise: patriarchy arose when private property arose, so with the abolishing of private property, patriarchy has to be abolished too.

You do sound like a trot: that because Engels said in Principles of Communism that a revolution has to be global, so it HAS to be global. But people like you don't want to investigate into what conditions Marx and Engels had in mind when they made the statement, and what conditions do we find ourselves in.

feminism arose when capitalism arose, so with the abolishing of capitalism, feminism has to be abolished too.

Shut up, revisionist.

Attached: TERF.jpg (750x1334, 119.63K)

Feminism was convenient for capitalists because women in the workplace benefited them.

There still are patriarchal sentiments, but are there actually any Patriarchs left ? As in head of a powerful church, or family clan, that actually perform the role in functional way. Not just symbolic stuff. Honest question

Feminism began with the Enlightenment you fucking fag

That's vulgar materialism lmao. Private property is what gave rise up patriarchal relations, but simply abolishing private property in and of itself won't get rid of patriarchal relations.

IIRC Angela Nagle argues that the answer to your question is "no" and therefore modern liberal democratic countries can't be described as patriarchies in any meaningful sense.

so what do current day feminists mean with overthrowing the patriarchy,is this an expression of an organisation in need of a foe for self-justification or is this misandry.