Half of "th*rd-positionists" have views that differ from your average neocon (or at best SocDem) by one or two points, and the other half are edgy teens that have never read any kind of materialist theory ever and just regurgitate either spiritualist bullshit or propaganda about the USSR.
Peterson vs truth
Jaxson Green
Matthew Davis
Could say the same to you
Henry Baker
>Natalya Reshetovskaya, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's first wife, wrote in her memoirs that The Gulag Archipelago was based on "campfire folklore" as opposed to objective facts. She wrote that she was "perplexed" that the Western media had accepted The Gulag Archipelago as "the solemn, ultimate truth", saying that its significance had been "overestimated and wrongly appraised". She said that her husband did not regard the work as "historical research, or scientific research", and added that The Gulag Archipelago was a collection of "camp folklore", containing "raw material" which her husband was planning to use in his future productions.[16] A controversial work, authored by a historian suspected of working with British intelligence, claims that her memoirs were part of a KGB campaign, orchestrated by Yuri Andropov in 1974, to discredit Solzhenitsyn.[17] Historian and archival researcher Stephen G. Wheatcroft asserts that it is essentially a "literary and political work", and "never claimed to place the camps in a historical or social-scientific quantitative perspective".[18] Revisionist historian, J. Arch Getty writes of Solzhenitsyn's methodology that "Such documentation is methodically unacceptable in other fields of history."[19] Gabor Rittersporn shares Getty's criticism saying "he is inclined to give priority to vague reminiscences and hearsay……inevitably [leads] towards selective bias.[20] Communist Party member, Roy Medvedev has referred to the book as "extremely contradictory".
Nicholas Allen
It's the perfect ideology, a blend of social conservatism and socialist/developmentalists economics with a nationalist cherry on top. It works best for everyone.
Stalin was one of the ultimate shabbos goys, an Asiatic mutt puppet who took the blame from the kikes who physically enslaved and slaughtered millions of Europeans. Kikes were the ones that carried out these despicable acts, with their good goy Stalin getting all the credit. Capitalism and Communism teamed up in WW2 to defeat the good guys, because Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same jewish coin.
Jaxon Foster
You don't understand nationalism if you think socialist economics and nationalism can coexist.
Lincoln Turner
lol
Daniel Flores
this, the whole reason the west gave so many concessions to hitler up until the last minute was that people like churchill wanted hitler to attack the soviet union
Caleb Jenkins
To be fair, Churchill in the late 30s was openly criticizing Chamberlain's attitude toward the USSR, since Churchill realized that trying to "appease" Hitler and hoping he'll march eastward was going to backfire on the UK.
Ethan Sanders
Not that the Zig Forumsyp has any points, but I don't think "nationalism" is bad as long it's not bourgeois. To quote Mao
"Can a Communist, who is an internationalist, at the same time be a patriot? We hold that he not only can be but also must be. The specific content of patriotism is determined by historical conditions. There is the "patriotism" of the Japanese aggressors and of Hitler, and there is our patriotism. Communists must resolutely oppose the "patriotism" of the Japanese aggressors and of Hitler. The Communists of Japan and Germany are defeatists with regard to the wars being waged by their countries. To bring about the defeat of the Japanese aggressors and of Hitler by every possible means is in the interests of the Japanese and the German people, and the more complete the defeat the better…. For the wars launched by the Japanese aggressors and Hitler are harming the people at home as well as the people of the world. China's case, however, is different, because she is the victim of aggression. Chinese Communists must therefore combine patriotism with internationalism. We are at once internationalists and patriots, and our slogan is, "Fight to defend the motherland against the aggressors." For us defeatism is a crime and to strive for victory in the War of Resistance is an inescapable duty."
But of course the nationalism/patriotism of the Zig Forumsyp is something that should be eradicated.
Ethan Barnes
I wish he had debated Wolff instead of Zizek.