Criticize anons state structure thesis!!!

I support communistic dual structuralist statism(doesnt seem to be a thing user makes another term"unless shown otherwise please do")! When I say that its merely a suggestion for state structure Im throwing out there. thats within the framework of communism. I believe there should be 2 bodies of mass social organization! Those 2 bodies are the production collective and the state! Both these bodies play roles as I will explain below

1.The production collective

(Thou its a massive organisations there are local branchs for each and evey trade service etc…)

2.the state

(Lets say were putting in a cross continent 400km speed train the state would over see it. by the way the train engineering union(a subsection of the broader production collective oversees it you controlled it not a corporation)
Want to leave the country?lol want to sell a car?want to take some tabs? want to distribute cigs on the corner?what a libertarian paradise

Anons this is no where near complete I just want to bounce it of people.

Remember all im throwing out there is that there should be 2 international organizations!(both having for planing… regional areas)1. the production collective (the worldwide workers union is in control of production)
2.(the state basically its helper agent!)

If you think my proposel deserves no consideration point it out!

Attached: 45bf9314e5827356f52c0f3c517894ac2c2b1ed97255afaa6d87d5a3e7c1d4fd.jpeg (425x620, 67.89K)

I support dual structuralist statism!!! Doesn't seem to be a thing user makes another term,correct me if wrong! When I say that its merely a suggestion for state structure Im throwing out there.Thats within the framework of communism. I believe there should be 2 bodies of mass social organization! Those 2 bodies are the production collective and the state! Both these bodies play roles as I will explain below

1.The production collective

(Thou its a massive organisations there are local branchs for each and every trade service etc…)


2.the state

Lets say were putting in a cross continent 400km speed train the state would over see it. How well by the train engineering union a subsection of the broader production collective they will oversees it you controlled it not a corporation.

Want to leave the country?lol want to sell a car?want to take some tabs? want to distribute cigs on the corner?what a libertarian paradise!


Remember all im throwing out there is that there should be 2 international organizations!(both being for planing… in regional areas)1. the production collective (the worldwide workers union is in control of production)
2.(the state basically its helper agent!)
Does the statistics or setting a universal high living standard!

Better gammar post forgive a user he will self edit harder in the future!!!

Honestly I just want something that provides the benefits of capitalism but doesn't destroy the environment, leave the rest to the engineers

I think thats this!!! Well did you read it what you think? (2nd one for better self edit)

Is it possible that these can truely never be seperate entities?

Who works for the second state? What prevents competition between regions? How is the commodity abolished?

As far as this is thought out it is a syndacalist new world order. Cockshott provides a better ideal, but ultimately the revolutionary state is going to be messy and imperfect. The important part is whether it's will can be imposed on the world.

"Who works for the second state"? Experts decided by the production collective! "What prevents competition between regions"? The proper planning to eliminate all scarcity and mutual agreement to be brief! No threat of scarcity no treat of resource based region conflict! How is the commodity abolished? A needs based needs provided based economy! Society is mathematically run on the satistics of a needs(A metric decided by the collective for it) in the 21st century's plus all wants!

Ultimately there are no such thing as the statistics of needs. The fact is there is no easy answer (like yours) to pull society into the socialist order. Scarcity is an eternal problem, especially with the fact that modern society rests on non-sustainable methods. Scarcity in some form will be here for the next one hundred years, hopefully guiding us to a sustainable world. But until then, it's shit. "How do we get to where you envision us?" is the call against the left which we must answer. And it is not written is ideals.

Stages this i end game

is*