twitter.com
FALC China arrives from the future. You can thank us later.
Nick Land Confirmed For Secret Commie
Matthew Myers
Other urls found in this thread:
thedarkenlightenment.com
archive.is
twitter.com
Landon Sanders
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧They🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 have shut it down.
David Gray
Nick Land sees the future as being a post-human capitalism.
Hunter Hernandez
you realize he used to be a commie before he was NRX right?
Jacob Anderson
What's a NRX?
Cameron Cook
The Dark Enlightenment, also known as the neoreactionary movement, neoreaction and abbreviated NRx by its proponents, is an anti-democratic, anti-liberal, and reactionary movement that considers itself to be the antithesis to the Enlightenment. It broadly rejects egalitarianism and the view that history shows inevitable progression towards greater liberty and enlightenment, thus it is in part a reaction against "Whig historiography".[1][2] The movement favors a return to older societal constructs and forms of government, including support for monarchism and other forms of leadership such as a "neocameralist CEO"[3] of a joint-stock republic,[4] coupled with a conservative or economic nationalist approach to economics.[5] Proponents generally also espouse socially conservative views including traditionalist opinions on gender roles, race relations, and immigration.
Leo Sullivan
stands for neoreactionary
thedarkenlightenment.com
Isaac Price
would be interesting to see this realized
Austin Powell
It is literally the end goal of neoliberalism. The dude loved China because of it.
John Price
And its inclusion free market economics is the reason NRX will never be anything more than a mere curiosity.
Historically, all successful fascist movements and organizations had to adopt elements of socialist rhetoric and goals in their platform in order to gain mass appeal. Even Trump, who is not a proper fascist, made appeals to protectionism and some social welfare programs (notably social security) on the campaign trail.
Oliver Bailey
*inclusion of
Robert Bennett
the end goal of neo liberalism is the opposite.
Super organisms like the EU creating "world cities" with nothing unique
Ryder King
NRx was never meant to be a popular movement. Politicians have to give welfare rhetoric for mass appeal. CEOs and theorists don't
Charles Martinez
Then it will never leave the confines of the internet.
Large-scale industrial production requires the illusion of popular consent. The only way to gain this is through mass appeal.
Michael King
Curtis Yarvin has actually opened a backchannel advisory connection to the White House.
Chase Nguyen
The White House operates within the deceptive "liberal-democratic" institutional framework.
To my understanding, NRx people want to actually create a new form of government and social order which, again, requires mass appeal.
Camden Foster
This is also incorrect. NRx does need to be a popular movement to be realized, in fact it could easily come about through CEOs getting more power and influence in the future.
why
Connor Johnson
This is incorrect. CEO's can't single-handedly create a new social structure. This is idealist nonsense.
Because large-scale industrial production requires the effort of hundreds of millions of people to function, the vast majority of whom are not CEOs. The second these people realize the system is not in their self-interest they will revolt and production stops.
Ryder Miller
Brandon Jenkins
Please tell me you're meming
Jason Reed
Ask yourself why the moment I suggest Elon Musk as grand CEO with a mandate and aegis to implement interstellar fully automated luxury space communisms all other options for CEO go out the window
Jaxson Gray
Add me on facebook
Lucas Jackson
source? theory? anything?
There is no reason to think this is impossible.
Plenty of people realize this in the real world and don't revolt.
Also companies selling consumer products don't need to spout the same rhetoric as politicians so what is expected from a CEO is much different than from a politician today
Christopher Cox
Zuckerberg just appropriated a technological development that was already occurring. All he did is put together a bloated microblogging service. The emergence of a dominant service like Facebook was bound to happen regardless.
Nathan Lewis
Sauce? Is it on his pseudonym blog?
Jayden Ward
they already have, it’s called consumerism.
Jose James
Nathan Reyes
Read Gramsci
Angel Watson
revisionists please go
Kevin Wright
No thank you. Its not even worth listening to anything the NRx have to say. Its just social democracy with coat of edginess.
Joshua Perez
its the rejection of social democracy
Landon Price
only if you count """""bio-Leninism"""" as communism
James Reed
Jackson Hughes
Age is not friendly