"Some criminologists argue that the appearance of a lower recidivism rate in male sex offenders who take chemical castration treatment than in those who do not can be explained by factors other than biological effects of the medication. One hypothesis is that men who accept the negative effects of hormonal treatment in exchange for shorter prison sentence are distinct in that they value freedom from incarceration higher than men who rather stay in prison for a longer time than face the side effects of chemical castration. These criminologists explain apparently lower recidivism as an artifact of men who accept chemical castration being more engaged in hiding the evidence for reoffending, and that paroling such offenders constitute a risk of releasing criminals who commit as many new crimes as others but are better at hiding it. These criminologists also argue that police investigators treating castrated men as less likely to reoffend than non-castrated men may cause an investigation bias and self-fulfilling prophecy, and that men who sell some of their prescribed medicines on the black market for drugs get a hidden income that improve their ability to afford measures to hide recidivism that is not available to men without such prescriptions.
Some neurologists acknowledge that testosterone plays a role in sexual arousal but that reducing sex drive will likely not reduce inappropriate sex behaviour. These researchers argue that since a weaker internal signal in the brain means a higher requirement for external stimulation to create a feedback loop that tires the brain circuits out as in orgasm and lead to satisfaction, a reduction of the internal stimulation from hormones would make the required external stimulation stronger and also more specific, as weaker signals involve narrower ranges of other brain functions in their loops. These scientists therefore argue that the biological (as opposed to sociological) effect of reduced testosterone is to make it more difficult and not easier to use masturbation without pornography or other socially acceptable substitutes to manage remaining sex drive in a former offender, and that many community persons (both male and female) find that a lower initial arousal makes it more difficult to orgasm by masturbation without pornography or with non-preferred stimulation"
Castrate Marxists and the sex offenses will plummet by 300% immediately.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
in the US it's estimated 2% to 6% are wrongful convictions. that's why even some conservatives/libertarians who aren't completely ignorant about the justice system are against the death penalty and favor life imprisonment, same logic should apply to castration, a wrongful conviction can be reversed
Trots especially. The Khmer Rouge was redpilled on sexuality. Strict monogamy, marriages had to be OK’d by the commune, adultery often punished by death. Only liberals want a sex-orgy utopia à la Kollontai
okay this is epc. put me in th screencap
If the goal is to prevent reoffending by rewiring the libido wouldn’t it work better to provide aphrodisiacs and new focus material than anaphrodisiacs and punishment?
This but with Catholics
user thats anti semitic
Chemical castration is stupid, just fucking shoot them
this but with reactionaries
Waste of tax payers money. What the prison system does inside to sex offenders should be good enough. I mean white, black, Hispanic all come together like a commune to eradicate the subhuman.
Okay.. And what does this have to do with liberalism and, in particular, rehabilitative justice? Also funny you claim the early bolsheviks were influenced by these "liberals", and then post a position that Lenin clearly disagrees with.
He was not some some sole dictator and the fact that he even considered that position so seriously shows how much standing it had. you cant be serious They are related and commonly referred to as socially liberal, the vast majority of those who believe in one of the two believe in the other as well. Rehabilitive justice is retarded, breivik is not going to become a person worth having just because we let him play playstation. It's waste to even keep people with cluster B perosnalities like him alive, more than that it is actually harmful to innocents.
No, but he clearly is an authority on communism for MLs. Sorry you're right. Liberalism is when you do things that trigger conservatives. Marx and Engels were liberals too for their crusade against the family, right? You take the most extreme case here. Rehabilitative justice has proven to be more effective than punitive justice in preventing repeat offenders.
Sexual liberation coincided with the rise of neoliberlism in the imperial core, it is liberlism materialised.
Wrong. Killing them is 100% effective.
fuck off Tory bastard
No to chemical castration, sex-drive doesn't cause sex-offenders.
However the subtextual proposition of converting a crime to medical problem, is in principle valid, with the caveat, that you actually know what you are doing, which you clearly aren't if you are proposing sledgehammer methods, like fucking up somebodies bio-chemical signalling systems.
Consider that prisons have two functions, first protection of the rest of society, second rehabilitation. The purpose of a prison is not retribution. It is abundantly clear what castration is about.
There is ideology there, it is currently existing feminism. Estrogen is irrelevant to sex drive. It causes the growth secondary sex characteristics and regulates other things unreleated to the sex drive.
Testosterone is the sex drive.
Pedophilia runs on sex drive, end it and it lacks fuel. Then the cause can be addressed. Chemical castration is not effective. Physical castration with T-blockers or prison.
As someone who is on chemical castration hormones circa 1950s (HRT), they don't do shit.
quite spouting nonsense
Tolerance for shit like chemical castration is a great example of how men are shit on as men because of sexism (not denying women's issues here). Most child abuse is at the hands of women due to how much more time kids spend with women. There are lots of adult women raping boys. Do you think anybody would get away with passing a law that punished those women similarly? Hell no. Why the discrepancy? Men are seen as disposable. "Bad people" are seen as disposable (but especially if they're men). Nobody really gives a fuck about men's bodies - look at the focus on women's body image issues but ignoring men's, look at the circumcision rate, look at how castration is seen as a joke. With that as the cultural background, it's easy to see how people would justify chemically mutilating men who were convicted of a sex crime.
castrations for all
Get them to do hard labour building things fixing fences planting trees. Having castrated prisoners sit inside all day is just pointless.
congratulations this thread has regressed to another gender war / incel debate
Incels are the biggest cancer of chan leftism. Absolutely degenerate.