Which is hilarious because of how they talk about HOW THE STRONG WILL DEFEAT THE WEAK
Why one should'nt be a nazi/fascist
Fun thing about Japanese homogeneity is that they achieved that by forced assimilation of all ethnicities that lived on the islands, outlawing local languages and customs and shit.
So it's a bunch of distinct ethnic groups with their own local tradition but on paper they're all "pure Japanese"
Hotler was a man who was always loyal. So loyal. He would kill to prove himself. He would do other things, too. He loved… many people. Many men. And he proved his love in the ways that couldn’t be faked. He was such a loving man, and such a proud man. Such a rare confluence of attributes. What could ever be fake coming from such a proud, loving man?
He proved his love to his best friends so many times.
Anyone who spoke of Hotler’s love in terms other than his pure love of his homeland died. That’s how everyone knew his love was only for his homeland, his volk. Everyone knew. He was such a loving man.
Hitler was a literal screaming retard. The Nazi leadership, in general, were also screaming retards. Screaming retards tend to get along with other screaming retards, it's kind of like gaydar.
The Weimar Republic enabled Hotler. He was so loyal, so pure, to those who knew him in private. So loving. Prison changed him for the better. His love grew only purer. He would prove himself again and again in the vast purity of his love. Nothing would ever turn him. Everyone knew.
The Jews swore after that there would never be another Hotler. Never again would there be another man that pure and loving in power.
Golly user, I’m just shitposting. This is such a fibrous board, you know?
I kind of figured.
I'm back.
Germans were not masturbating to the semi-pornographic stories disseminated as propaganda. lol
Your argument is completely invalid.
Berlin was a sex capital where any perversion could be bought and sold.
Drunks, degenerates… It was a cesspool.
What you're suggesting is that Hitler was a puppet which is something Q has mentioned, a puppet at the start.
In that case, Nazism never existed organically, and just like these fellas,
today's Nazi's could simply be shit posting!
Look how triggered most of you are, respecting it as something legitimate, going so far as to suggest that Nazism is hedonistic. I find that incredibly hard to believe, but I guess I'll have to read some Goebbels.
Based on how you've corrupted some ideas like equating Jewish Berlin and the infinity realm of prostitution with some propaganda pamphlets produced for war morale, I can only assume you've misinterpreted Goebbels words.
That or…
youtu.be
Watch from about 1:45 and look when Cobain shifts to what he's supposed to say. You can see him struggle to remember the script he was given.
Drummer is smoking a cig out of stress, and bassist is squirming trying to help Cobain remember his lines.
I just put German Dream in quotes to infer that it's something like the American Dream, a concept that may not have even existed as a meme but still stood as an ideal, prosperous society. To insist that Germans were wanting a perverted, degenerate, society because of Goebbels use of the term hedonist and pleasure is a bit obtuse.
A healthy ecosystem is all I would surmise.
I think we're getting a bit lost here.
Monopoly of violence is the world we live in today. Suggesting that that's the tool we're going to use to usher in a utopia, is like saying you have to cut your wounds every day so they can heal. We're already using it. Are you suggesting we use it for establishing a different economic system?
So then your beef is not with people that squabble but with the people that are behind the monopoly of violence?
Would neighbor conflicts ceasing by force be the means to an end?
To me squabbles are symptoms of a source problem, a desired distraction maintained pitifully.
Often times it's fueled by the ruling class anyway.
I would love to see your list of countries that succeeded under socialism and what your definition of success is.
Japan is an amazing place.
I spent a month there.
Every country is dealing with some sort of problem(s). Australia's most common death for men is suicide. MANY men are committing suicide due to going through divorces, presumably prompted by women or at least due to the court's fairness.
I met some Japanese that recognize their tendency for reserved behavior, but I don't think it's something nearly as destructive as tendencies of any other country. To me they've coped the best out of any developed country, that I've been to at least.
Reals>feels, indeed. However, how do you deliver the reals to everyone? Until you can, you can't just interject with violence to solve anything.
The elite know this, that's why they use propaganda to divide and conquer by demographic so any demographic is always at some point in conflict with another, a scapegoat.
Private property has been the marker of success since existence. I suppose it's a noble consideration, a transformational process for the world, but I think your bigger concern is the monopoly of land ownership, the loopholes people use to maintain it, the abuse of corporate wealth to consolidate land, the loopholes to avoid property tax which was meant to limit the growth of individuals (circumnavigated by corporations often), and the poor training involved in maintaining land.
There's just too much corruption that needs to be cleaned up to suggest, in my mind, that ending land ownership is the solution.
If you're suggesting land ownership as a thing is the cause for the corruption, then perhaps you have an argument there.