"anit-idpol" does not mean "against idpol"

yea now explain to me how supporting views in favor of progressing policies that are against these notions bad. (again if they are not supported by capitalism and so forth)

basically this, get rid of capitalism and one step closer to equality.

Lmfao, this isn't an "old mistake" bro, you completely reject the progressive character of nationalism of the oppressed, you're completely revising the line of Lenin and Stalin, 100%. You'd rather completely set aside the marxist principles on national liberation than just maybe say, "okay, let's address racism and sexism".

They are supported by capitalism. Remove the material basis and they lose their support structure. Going after the ideology instead of the material factors is what makes it idealism.

Stalin also lobbied for the creation of Israel. How did that turn out, and what did it reveal about the "progressive character" of nationalism of the oppressed?

when talking about women's and black people's liberation we should always insist that revolution and socialism is part and parcel of this, and they cannot be separated. However, we also DO need to combat the ideology, the base leads the super-structure yes, but not only economic changes by itself will be enough, the base and super-structure have a dialectical unity with each other, they reinforce each other, therefore it is extremely important to struggle with the population and to actively combat racism and sexism in culture and among cadres.

You're a fucking idiot. Also, that was a correct decision to make at the time you're taking that policy completely out of context, here educate yourself: theredphoenixapl.org/2011/06/30/the-soviet-jews-zionism-israel/

American blacks are spread out and now an integral part of capitalist american life.do you not know how to reply correctly?

That's not identity politics because it stems from class.

Hey newfag, if you click the number at the top of a post, you can link to that post.

Attached: newfag guide.png (536x113, 7.7K)

k

Is that ad-hominem supposed to be an "argument"?

How's Zimbabwe doing?