Alright leftypol...
...
really, that's the rebuttal you're going with?
Just pointing out how shit your logic is.
What does the phrase "To each according to his need" mean to you?
The problem with private property is that the number of people on Earth is always increasing. And also that the wealth concentration keeps getting higher meanwhile the ammount of avalaible primary resources stay for the most part static. . So the majority get fcked in both ways, they have a thinner share of the pie and the world gets even more competitive. This imply two possibilities, the first, everyone is using their share more efficiently as the process goes on, or resources stay in the same hands, and a greater ammount of individual are left behind, which imply more crime and mental illnesses. The later being more probable for obvious reasons, this is why private property can be considered as bad and communism good.
How about you just say what you wanna say instead of this mealy mouthed shit?
I just did. Personal property is a meaningless term in a communist society where we consume based on need, not based on ownership.
That's your argument? LOL
You don't have to retreat into this theoretical speak. People want to own their personal items. Maybe we should be a bit more lax with that kind of thing but this line of argument is just silly.
The population on earth is projected to stabilize, and there is no indication we will end up short of primary resources