Corbyn: An exception to first world electoralism

Why would anyone support a literal theocracy? It seems like this board is more dedicated to cheering on literal dictators than any revolutionary praxis

The board of Goldman Sachs supports LGBT issues and I would hardly call them revolutionary.

Also you have not addressed western imperialist involvement in Syria. I agree that the SAA are responsible for horrible things however I would argue that this point is based on emotion and not conducive with the theory on ‘the United front’.

We don't "support" Syria and Iran, we *critically* support them in the face of imperialism.
I'll support a revolution in Iran as soon as the empire has fallen, but right now Iran is one of the only countries in the world standing up against imperialism.

You do realise that the Iranian Revolutionary Government actively supports National Liberation movements in the Global South such as Hezbollah, Houthi rebels and the fight against Imperialist back Wahhabi Jihadists in Syria and Iraq. This alone had done more to support global proletarian liberation than any so-called ‘leftist’ group or person in any first world country in the last 50 years.

lol he's an imperialist, if you were actually MLM you'd understand this